Activists critical of federal policy designed to curb antibiotics in meat

The White House just released a new policy that outlines a strong effort on the part of federal agencies to promote “antibiotic stewardship — the development, promotion, and implementation of activities to ensure the responsible use of antibiotics” for livestock.

Federal agencies will now be required to sign a memorandum promising that they will “create a preference” for meat and poultry purchases that have been raised in a responsible and humane environment. The Presidential Food Service is even stricter and will “commit to serving meats that have not been treated with antibiotics or hormones.”

Although the new policy makes it sound like the government wants to cut back on antibiotic and hormone usage in farming, the news release is vague on the specifics, as the International Business Times points out. The White House also stipulated that the new policies will take five years to go into full effect.  

The National Resource Defense Council has immediately expressed concern that the new policy could actually create a loophole for “irresponsible antibiotics usage.”

“To truly eliminate the routine use of antibiotics in animals that are not sick, the federal government should do more to ensure that antibiotics are used to only treat sick animals and control disease outbreaks,” Mae Wu, health attorney at the Natural Resources Defense Council, said in a statement.

“The federal policy should halt all routine use of medically important antibiotics, not just one category of routine use.”

But are antibiotics really that big of a deal? Read the full story.

More from The Daily Meal

FDA: 70 Percent of Antibiotics Sold in US are Used in Livestock, and That Number Continues to Rise

Tyson Foods to Eliminate Human Antibiotics in Chicken Production by 2017

McDonald’s USA Moving Toward Antibiotic-Free Chicken, Hormone-Free Milk

9 Out of 10 Doctors Concerned about Antibiotic Use on Farms