Lindsey Graham 'stunned' at SCOTUS decision on Dreamers: I didn't think Trump admin could lose

Sen. Lindsey Graham said Friday that he was "stunned" by the Supreme Court's ruling against the Trump administration's effort to end the Obama-era Deferred Action on Childhood Arrivals (DACA) program,­ which offers legal protections to young immigrants brought to the country illegally as children.

Appearing on "Fox News @ Night" with host Shannon Bream, Graham, R-S.C., pointed out that while the court did not side with the president, the administration can "fix this pretty quickly by writing another memo."

READ THE OPINION

"But, I was stunned. I told the president Tuesday night, you know, 'I don't think you can lose this one.' Well, what did I know?" asked Graham.

In a 5-4 decision, with Chief Justice John Roberts joining his liberal counterparts to author the opinion, the Supreme Court said that the administration's decision to rescind DACA violated the Administrative Procedure Act (APA), which sets out rulemaking procedures for federal agencies.

"We do not decide whether DACA or its rescission are sound policies. 'The wisdom' of those decisions 'is none of our concern,'" Roberts wrote in his opinion. "We address only whether the agency complied with the procedural requirement that it provide a reasoned explanation for its action."

Supporters of the Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals program rally on Olivera Street in Los Angeles, Calif., Sept. 5, 2017. (REUTERS/ Kyle Grillot )

Supporters of the Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals program rally on Olivera Street in Los Angeles, Calif., Sept. 5, 2017. (REUTERS/ Kyle Grillot )

The Trump administration has argued that DACA, an executive order, was established through improper means to begin with, claiming it should have been done via legislation from Congress. They also believed that the decision to eliminate DACA does not fall under the purview of the APA because DACA itself was merely a decision not to enforce existing law against a certain group of people.

The Supreme Court disagreed, noting that "DACA is not simply a non-enforcement policy" because it is an actual program where people apply to receive a benefit.

Justice Clarence Thomas wrote in a dissenting opinion that the decision to repeal DACA was correct and that the majority is holding the Trump administration's decision to a higher standard than the order that initially established DACA.

SUPREME COURT RULES AGAINST TRUMP ADMINISTRATION BID TO END DACA PROGRAM

"These cases could –­ and should –­ have ended with a determination that his legal conclusion was correct," he wrote. "Instead, the majority today concludes that [the Department of Homeland Security (DHS)] was required to do far more."

He continued: "Without grounding its position in either the APA or precedent, the majority declares that DHS was required to overlook DACA’s obvious legal deficiencies and provide additional policy reasons and justifications before restoring the rule of law. This holding is incorrect, and it will hamstring all future agency attempts to undo actions that exceed statutory authority. I would, therefore, reverse the judgments below and remand with instructions to dissolve the nationwide injunctions.”

Conservative justices Justice Samuel Alito, Justice Neil Gorsuch and Justice Brett Kavanaugh all filed opinions that concurred with parts of the majority as well as with parts of the dissent — with several emphasizing that the majority ruling simply punted the issue back to the administration.

"So, I think Clarence Thomas had it right," Graham remarked. "I think the DACA program created by President Obama is illegal on its face. No president can say 700,000 people here illegally all of sudden have legal status no matter how sympathetic the cause may be."

Graham also agreed with Justice Kavanaugh's partial dissent.

"Assuming that DACA was legal, the memo by [DHS Sec. Kirstjen] Nielsen explaining why the administration wanted to rescind the policy was more than adequate. Certainly not capricious and arbitrary," he stated further.

CLICK HERE FOR THE FOX NEWS APP

"So, I disagree with the court. I respect the court. I like John Roberts. He's a smart guy. But, the politics of immigration have changed dramatically," he told Bream.

"I think the court was arbitrary and capricious in deciding whether or not the Trump administration was arbitrary and capricious."

Fox News' Ronn Blitzer and Bill Mears contributed to this report.