Zuckerberg’s $45M for Georgia elections boosted Dem turnout, watchdog report says
Mark Zuckerberg's 2020 election spending was heavily weighted toward increasing turnout in blue counties versus red counties
The election outcomes in Georgia, one of the most pivotal states in November — and again in the state's two U.S. Senate runoffs in January — may have been significantly affected by a total of $45 million from Facebook founder Mark Zuckerberg and wife Priscilla Chan.
That's the finding of a government watchdog that has tracked the money used to finance election administration across the country.
Zuckerberg and Chan gave $350 million to the Center for Tech and Civic Life (CTCL), which distributed the grants to 48 states and Washington, D.C., for election administration in the lead-up to November 2020. Of that, $31 million went to Georgia for the general election, where Joe Biden narrowly won the state's 16 electoral votes, beating then-President Trump by fewer than 12,000 votes.
The center also gave $14.5 million to Georgia counties for the state's two January runoff elections, where Democrats won both to flip the U.S. Senate majority to Democrats.
The Foundation for Government Accountability contends the grant money in Georgia and across the country was heavily weighted toward Democratic-leaning counties. While billed as election safety grants during the coronavirus pandemic, only a small portion in any of the states the foundation examined was used for personal protective equipment.
The CTCL gave about four times more in the Zuckerberg-financed grants to blue counties in Georgia as it gave to red counties, according to the FGA analysis.
For the 2020 election, the CTCL gave about $29 million in grants to Georgia counties that Biden won, with a rate of $7.13 per registered voter. By contrast, the center gave $2.3 million in grants — averaging $1.91 per registered voter — to counties that Trump won. The counties getting the most in the lead-up to the presidential election were Fulton, Cobb and DeKalb.
ZUCKERBERG'S FUNDING OF ELECTION OPERATIONS PROMPTS LITIGATION, CONCERN FROM CONSERVATIVES
"The Zuckerberg funding is an unprecedented example of using government employees and government resources to put your finger on the scale, to affect the election outcome," Tarren Bragdon, CEO of the Foundation for Government Accountability, told Fox News. "It would be like giving private money to police departments to have officers do more stop and frisk in certain neighborhoods compared to other neighborhoods. It would be like giving money to the tax department to do increased audits in certain zip codes or neighborhoods versus other neighborhoods."
About half of the counties that Biden carried received Zuckerberg money, while just 20 percent of counties Trump carried received any. The CTCL gave more than $1 million to only six counties in the lead up to 2020—all of which Democratic candidate Hillary Clinton carried in 2016. While the share of the Democratic vote increased in most Georgia counties from 2016 to 2020 by about one percentage point, counties that didn’t get Zuckerberg-funded grants "barely budged at all," according to the FGA analysis.
The CTCL did not respond for to inquiries for comment, but has previously defended the grants to Fox News.
"Last year, with generous private funding, CTCL announced the COVID-19 Response grant program," the organization told Fox News in a statement in April. "All local election offices responsible for administering election activities covered by the CTCL COVID-19 Response grant program were eligible to apply for grant funds. … Over half of all grants nationwide went to election departments that serve fewer than 25,000 registered voters."
It’s important to look at the numbers and the facts, countered Bragdon.
"They will talk about most of the counties that got money had fewer than 25,000 people or that X percent of counties were Republican counties," Bragdon said. "But the key here is to follow the money. And the money went disproportionately to Democratic counties. In Georgia, more than 90 percent of the money went to those Democrat counties. And you could see from the spending per registered voter that it was not proportionate at all."
Late Saturday, June 5, a spokesperson for Zuckerberg and Chan issued the following statement to Fox News regarding the couple's donations:
"When our nation’s election infrastructure faced unprecedented challenges last year due to the pandemic, Mark and Priscilla stepped up to close a funding gap and granted $350 million to the Center for Tech and Civic Life, a non-partisan, 501 (c)(3) organization, which issued an open call to local jurisdictions across the country and provided funding for all jurisdictions that were determined to be legitimate.
"Nearly 2,500 election jurisdictions from 49 states applied for and received funds, including urban, suburban, rural, and exurban counties. While Mark and Priscilla provided an overall grant to CTCL to ensure funding was available, they did not participate in the process to determine which jurisdictions received funds, and as a (c)(3) CTCL is prohibited from engaging in partisan activities."
The spokesperson also the following background information:
- Smaller jurisdictions outnumbered the larger ones that applied, and in Texas alone for example nearly half of the counties applied for and received funds.
- No matter whether they traditionally voted Republican, Democrat, or were swing districts, all qualified jurisdictions that applied received funds, and a list was made public here.
- If you read through that county list, it will show that more counties nationwide that received grants from CTCL voted for President Trump than President Biden.
$6.3M FOR ELECTIONS FROM ZUCKERBERG, BIG TECH POUR INTO WISCONSIN DESPITE CONSERVATIVE PUSHBACK
Although the justification for the grants was safety for voters and election workers during the COVID-19 pandemic, the watchdog group’s analysis says some counties didn’t spend any money on personal protective equipment. While Fulton, Cobb and Dekalb spent on average 1.3 percent of the Zuckerberg-funded grants on PPE, the bulk of the money was spent on mail-in voting, according to the report.
"This had nothing to do with COVID and had everything to do with using government resources and government employees to play politics," Bragdon added.
The $14.5 million in grants for the special Senate election was similarly spent, in which more than 60 percent of the Zuckerberg-funded grants went to heavily Democratic Fulton and DeKalb counties.
Seven states — Arizona, Arkansas, Florida, Georgia, Idaho, Kansas and Tennessee — have enacted laws to prevent private dollars from funding election administration.
CLICK HERE TO GET THE FOX NEWS APP
With regard to states restricting election jurisdictions from accepting private dollars, CTCL Executive Director Tiana Epps-Johnson said private money is regularly used to supplement local government shortfalls such as libraries.
"We hope that as states consider the issue of private funding, they solve the real long-standing problem, which is making sure that election departments are fully funded so they are able to deliver a professional, inclusive, secure voting process for all of their voters," Epps-Johnson told Fox News in April.