The First Amendment is a key to American liberty in glorious ways, but it is not an excuse for bad manners.

Back when Ed Koch was riding roughshod over New York politics, writer Jack Newfield mused that there were 10,000 people waiting to be the second person to punch Koch in the nose. Sure enough, when the mayor faltered, his opponents gleefully piled on.

Or will his drift left to vanquish challenger Cynthia Nixon harm his chances?

Here's why I am hoping that The New York Times will temper its war against Trump and adopt a more balanced coverage in its news pages. Cue the laughter, but there are sound reasons for the paper to change course.

A better option has yet to emerge for 2020, New York Post columnist and Fox News contributor Michael Goodwin says.

Clinton, despite her enormous flaws and two presidential defeats, can’t be ruled out as the party’s best hope. God knows she wants it more than anybody else.

The left-wing media's extraordinarily venomous and personal attacks on West reminded me of the left’s unhinged smears of Brett Kavanaugh and Trump.

Hillary Clinton knows we are already in the danger zone when it comes to the political temperature. Her comments are as reckless as bringing a can of gasoline to a bonfire.

Willing to destroy any part of government they cannot corrupt with partisanship, members of the self-declared resistance are tearing America apart because the election didn’t go their way.

Reader Jamie Gelfand asks the right question about the Brett Kavanaugh disgrace, writing: “If Christine Blasey Ford held a news conference tomorrow and said she made everything up and apologized for dragging Kavanagh through the mud, would even one Democrat change his vote?”