Kudlow: Supreme Court EPA ruling 'affects all of the Green New Deal'
FOX Business anchor Larry Kudlow breaks down the implications of the Supreme Court's ruling limiting EPA powers.
Last week, the Supreme Court ruled that the Environmental Protection Agency lacks the authority to force the American power industry to adopt its green-energy ideology by regulation.
This decision not only scores a victory for the rule of law by restoring lawmaking authority to the people’s representatives in Congress, rather than unelected Washington bureaucrats, but provides the American people desperately needed relief from one of the Biden’s administration’s costly green fantasies.
For the past year and a half, President Joe Biden has pursued a radical theology of green energy without any regard for the real consequences for American workers and families. Biden recently contended: "[When] it comes to the gas prices, we’re going through an incredible transition that is taking place that, God willing, when it’s over, we’ll be stronger and the world will be stronger and less reliant on fossil fuels when this is over."
Biden is finally saying out loud what many in his orbit have been whispering for some time: He wants to use high gas prices to force America to accept the left’s top priority, a transition to green energy.
But the unfortunate reality is that the green payoff they promise is just a mirage because it is impossible to power American cars, homes, and businesses using only green energy.
The technology simply isn’t there. Sources like wind and solar are inefficient, unreliable, and built with materials that aren’t abundant enough to satisfy current energy demand.
As much attention and government funding as modern green energy receives, because of its inefficiency, it comprises just 9% of U.S. power consumption. To replace hydrocarbons, global green energy production would need to increase by 9,000 percent.
I support energy innovation and efficiency, and I believe the American people do, too. But markets, not radical theology, must dictate this transition. American consumers and businesses should not be sacrificed on the altar of green energy.
For wind and solar to be useful when the wind isn’t blowing and the sun isn’t shining, their power must be stored. Yet the world’s largest battery manufacturing facility can only produce enough storage each year to power the United States for three minutes. That is, it would take that factory 1,000 years to make enough batteries to power the United States for two days.
More generally, this green fantasy would require more turbines, batteries, and panels than the world has raw materials to make. All the mines that exist in the world today for critical minerals like graphite, cobalt, vanadium, and nickel produce only one-third of what is required to achieve the green transition, according to the International Monetary Fund.
FILE -- A man rids his bike against the win as giant wind turbines are powered by strong winds at sunset on March 27, 2013 in Palm Springs, California. (2013 Getty Images)
Germany, a country that rushed toward abandoning traditional energy sources, has already proven this thesis. It has suddenly been forced to start burning coal again as a consequence of poor planning resulting from its blind adherence to this green theology.
GERMANY STEPS UP MEASURES TO CONSERVE GAS AS RUSSIA SLOWS SUPPLY TO EUROPE
In addition to being unfeasible, the premature rush to "green" our energy sources has destabilized the world and benefited our enemies, economically and politically.
FILE – President Joe Biden ((AP Photo/Susan Walsh))
Take China, the world’s largest producer of solar panels, batteries, and electric vehicles. Their effective monopoly on green energy manufacturing (using coal power, of course) has forced Biden to bow to Chinese pressure on tariffs.
These green energy policies are also bankrolling Russian President Vladimir Putin’s war in Ukraine.
CLICK HERE TO GET THE OPINION NEWSLETTER
In spite of all of the saber-rattling, Europe still depends on Russia for oil and gas. And the record-high prices Putin is reaping for these commodities account for more than half of Russia’s annual budget. Europe now sends over $1 billion each day to Russia for energy. To quote Sergey Lavrov, "this year [Russia] will significantly increase the profits from the export of our energy resources."
Russian Foreign Minister Sergei Lavrov speaks at a ceremony, Friday, May 6, 2022. (Russian Foreign Ministry)
To put these numbers in context, Russia’s military budget last year was $66 billion. So as a result of this dependence, the West is funding Russia’s entire annual war budget roughly every two months.
The true green zealots seem unable to accept these facts, and America is paying the price.
CLICK HERE TO GET THE FOX NEWS APP
To be clear, I support energy innovation and efficiency, and I believe the American people do, too. But markets, not radical theology, must dictate this transition. American consumers and businesses should not be sacrificed on the altar of green energy.
What Biden has called an "incredible transition" weakens our country while strengthening our enemies, and we should reject it. Instead, let’s restore the all-of-the-above approach that was working in January, 2021, when America was energy independent and exporting freedom all over the world.
Get the recap of top opinion commentary and original content throughout the week.