House committee advances DC statehood bill along party-line vote
The new state would be called 'Washington, Douglass Commonwealth'
A panel of House Democrats advanced legislation Wednesday to make Washington, D.C., the 51st state in the union after hourslong debate over the constitutionality of the plan and the political ramifications of a newly minted blue state.
The House Oversight Committee voted 25-19 in a party-line vote to support statehood and to send the bill to a full vote of the House next week. No Republican backed the measure.
Backed by D.C. residents, Mayor Muriel Bowser and D.C. Delegate Eleanor Holmes Norton, supporters of statehood argued it's long overdue to end the taxation of Washingtonians without federal government representation.
"Congress can no longer exclude D.C. residents from the democratic process, forcing residents to watch from the sidelines as Congress votes on laws that affect the nation or votes even on the laws of the duly elected D.C. government," Norton said Wednesday.
HOUSE TO VOTE ON DC STATEHOOD BILL DURING WEEK OF APRIL 19
"Democracy requires much more. D.C. residents demand much more. D.C. residents deserve full voting representation in the Senate and the House and complete control over their local affairs. They deserve statehood."
The Democrat-led House passed D.C. statehood once before, but the legislation died in the GOP-controlled Senate last year. Norton expressed optimism that her legislation would pass the full House again despite the very slim Democratic majority now in the House.
D.C. has a population of more than 700,000 residents -- greater than Wyoming and Vermont -- but the residents don't have voting members in Congress or full control over local affairs. However, the District of Columbia pays more in federal taxes than 21 states and more per capita than any state, according to the 2019 IRS data book.
Under the plan, the 51st state would be called "Washington, Douglass Commonwealth," named for Frederick Douglass. The state would consist of 66 of the 68 square miles of the present-day federal district.
D.C. would have full control over local affairs and full representation in Congress, which would amount to two senators and one representative in the House based on the current population.
The two square miles around the White House, Capitol, Supreme Court and National Mall would be carved out into a reduced federal district controlled by Congress and named the "Capital."
22 STATE REPUBLICAN AGS SEND LETTER ARGUING DC STATEHOOD IS ‘UNCONSTITUTIONAL'
Republicans have been firmly against D.C. statehood, calling it a Democratic power grab designed to shift control in the Senate in favor of Democrats by adding two senators from a liberal stronghold.
"It's very obvious that the reason that D.C. wants statehood is the extra two senators that would go with it, which would then tip the balance of the Senate on behalf of the Democrats," said Rep. Andrew Clyde, R-Ga.
Republicans claimed the statehood plan is unconstitutional since the federal enclave's establishment is constitutionally based, so any change to the district must come in the form of a constitutional amendment — not legislation from Congress. The four-hour hearing involved several debates over the 23rd Amendment which gave the District three electoral votes in the presidential Electoral College and whether statehood could be granted before its repeal.
Republicans also charged the new state would have too much power over the federal government in terms of controlling the surrounding infrastructure, with Rep. Pete Sessions, R-Texas, alleging D.C. would condone a culture of lawlessness and riots.
"It's very disturbing it makes the Capitol totally beholden to one small microstate," said Rep. Jody Hice, R-Ga. "...If somehow this manages to bypass the constitution, we are going to have a world of problems that opens a Pandora's box in so many different ways. So this is a bad idea, it's a bad bill [and] it's unconstitutional."
Republicans unsuccessfully sought to offer an amendment to allow DC residents to vote in Maryland congressional and Senate elections. Democrats quickly panned the effort as an unfair request for Washingtonians to give up their identity in order to gain the right to vote in another state.
"DC residents don't want to vote in Maryland, they're not asking for that, and Maryland residents don't want DC residents to vote in Maryland," said Rep. Carolyn Maloney, D-N.Y., chair of the House Oversight Committee. "...Statehood is not only about voting and congressional representation, it's also about giving D.C. residents full, local self-government [and] political equality. "
A vote on statehood is scheduled for next week in the full House, House Majority Leader Steny Hoyer, D-Md., said Wednesday.
The statehood legislation, H.R. 51, has 215 cosponsors, which all but shores up Democratic support. The Senate version of the bill, S. 51, sponsored by Delaware Sen. Tom Carper, has 44 of the 50 Democrats in the Senate as co-sponsors, including Majority Leader Chuck Schumer, D-N.Y.
DEMOCRATS RENEW DC STATEHOOD PUSH THAT WOULD REMAKE NATIONAL POLITICS
However, the legislation needs 60 votes to advance and therefore will die again in the Senate without GOP support.
Rep. Jamie Raskin, D-Md., acknowledged the historic political concerns about admitting a new state to the union and offered a comprise suggestion to Republicans to pair D.C.'s statehood with admitting Puerto Rico into the union which has been backed by the GOP in past, including former President Ronald Reagan.
"Let's make a deal," Raskin told his GOP colleagues at the committee hearing. "... Let's make democracy grow. Let's admit both Washington D.C., as the Democrats have asked for and Puerto Rico as the Republicans have asked for."
CLICK HERE TO GET THE FOX NEWS APP
No Republicans jumped at Raskin's offer.