This is a rush transcript from "Hannity," June 8, 2009. This copy may not be in its final form and may be updated.

SEAN HANNITY, HOST: And it has been almost four months since the stimulus was signed into law, unemployment is up, and the amount spent on bailouts rivals the GDP of most countries. Now even though the president's economic team is reportedly fighting with each other, the president still promised today to save or create 600,000 jobs by the end of the summer, whatever that means.

All of this is adding up to one thing, and that is our headline tonight: "I Told Ya So." But those aren't the words of little old Sean Hannity, that is the opinion of former vice presidential nominee Governor Sarah Palin, and with every day that goes by, it looks more and more like Senator McCain and Governor Palin were right about where President Obama is taking this country.

And that was just one of the topics that we covered when I spoke exclusively to the governor this past weekend.


HANNITY: Governor, welcome to New York.

GOVERNOR SARAH PALIN (R-ALA.): Thank you so much. It's so good to be here in your stomping grounds.

HANNITY: Yes, literally very close to my home. So I know you came here just to let me, let's see, I'm running for governor, I'm running for president.

PALIN: Yeah right, right, right. Yeah, no. No.

Web Exclusive: Watch the complete uncut interview

HANNITY: For all of us in New York, where you are now, where we pay 10 percent income tax, you actually give every citizen in Alaska a check.

PALIN: We are the only state with the negative tax rate, where we don't have an income sales or property tax statewide, and yes, we have a share of our oil resource revenue goes back to the people who own the resources. Imagine that.

HANNITY: You're in the middle of a big debate now in Alaska over the stimulus, and it's you and a couple of other governors, but you in particular have pointed out that this stimulus money from Washington comes with a lot of strings attached?

PALIN: It sure does.


PALIN: The whole stimulus package, you know, I'm looking at it now thinking what the heck happened with that thing? When it was first crafted, Congress was asked to vote on it without even knowing what was in it.

Many of the Republicans voted against it and encouraged states to really have a heads-up regarding what was in it and the strings attached to it. So those governors like me, we paid attention to that. We said, you know, we'll dig into there, and we will make sure that we know what those strings are.

So we saw the fat strings attached to these dollars, the least of which is the contribution to the federal government's dizzying debt that we're handing to our kids.


PALIN: But many other specific strings tied to buckets of money. So a lot of us governors said we didn't want all of the dollars. Infrastructure dollars, good, let's go build roads and water system and sewer systems, appropriate tools the government should provide for the private sector.

But just growing government, we didn't want to accept all those funds. So lawmakers around the nation, many bodies, legislatures, decided to resolve to take the money anyway going around the governors, so we saw a lot of that.

HANNITY: But now you're in a little bit of a battle, too, even within the state over the acceptance of the stimulus dollars, and that you've actually made a point last week as saying, those strings that I told you about are real.

PALIN: They're real. They're real. Yes.

HANNITY: Yes, and so how — what's the status of that? And...

PALIN: Right. Well, I vetoed a bucket of the money, not a whole lot, we did accept education dollars and infrastructure dollars, but dollars that were tied to universal energy building codes for Alaska, kind of a one-size-fits-all building code that isn't going to work up there in Alaska and really prohibits opportunity to build and to develop, and just wasn't going to work up there in Alaska, so I vetoed a bucket of that money.

Our lawmakers now are considering they override of the veto which is cool, that's checks and balances. You know they can explore that.

HANNITY: You don't want them to, though?

PALIN: I don't think that it would be a healthy thing for our state to adopt because it would be a federal mandate, fixed, centralized government, telling Alaskan communities that have opted out of building codes for the most part.

Them telling us what's best for our businesses and residences, how to build them, and we're all for energy conservation. We have hundreds of millions of dollars, in fact, budgeted for programs there but we don't want those fat strings attached where centralized, big government is going to tell us what is best.

HANNITY: What do you make of — look at the state of the economy now. I mean just last week when unemployment went from 8.9 percent to 9.4, we've quadrupled the deficit in a year. We — CBO says we're going to have literally $10 trillion in debt at the end of 10 years where we're paying almost $1 trillion on interest on the debt.

You're a governor. You have to balance budgets. What does that mean in terms of the overall economy? What are your thoughts on it?

PALIN: Well, when you — you consider this, the federal government is about $11 trillion in debt, and we're borrowing more to spend more, it defies any sensible economic policy that any of us ever learned going through college, defies economy practices and principles that tell you you've got to quit digging that hole when you are in that financial hole.


PALIN: America is digging a deeper hole, and how are we paying for this government largesse? We're borrowing from China, and when you consider that now we own 60 percent of General Motors or the U.S. government does, consider, but who is the U.S. government becoming more and more indebted to?

It's China. So that leaves you to have to ask who really is going to own our car industry in America?

HANNITY: You know, but it goes back — it does harken back a little to the campaign. I mean spread the wealth, patriotic duty.

PALIN: Kind of a we told you so?

HANNITY: Well, is that how you feel?

PALIN: That's how I feel. I feel like — and I think that more and more constituents are going to kind of open their eyes now and open their ears to hear what's really going on and realize OK, maybe we didn't have a good way of expressing or articulating that message of, here is what America could potentially become if we grow government to such a degree that we cannot pay for it and we have to borrow money from other countries, some countries that don't necessarily like America.

HANNITY: Tim Geithner got laughed at in China last week. Is this even more than you thought was going to be in terms of where the president would take the economy?

PALIN: What's more than I thought would be is we're hearing a lot of good rhetoric. A lot of this is wrapped in good rhetoric, but we're not seeing those actions, and this many months into the new administration, quite disappointed, quite frustrated with not seeing those actions to rein in spending, slow down the growth of government.

Instead, China's the complete opposite. It's expanding at such a large degree that if Americans are paying attention, unfortunately, our country could evolve into something that we do not even recognize, certainly that is so far from what the founders of our countries had in mind for us.

HANNITY: Socialism?

PALIN: Well, that is where we are headed, and we have to be blunt enough and candid and honest enough with Americans to let them know that if we keep going down these roads, nationalizing many of our services, our projects, our businesses, yes, that is where we would head, and that's why Americans have to be paying attention, and we have to have our voices heard and ultimately it needs to be our will, the American people's will, imposed on Washington instead of the other way around.

HANNITY: Do you think that maybe people are changing their minds, maybe waking up to a little bit to the fact, and you spent some time with President Obama. What did you think of it?

PALIN: Very nice man. Very nice man. I do think, though, that as more and more Americans are tuning in to the discussion on the value added tax, for instance, they're going to start saying yes, you know, you're right, the only way that we're going to pay for those.

HANNITY: Which is the national sales tax.

PALIN: National sales tax is going to affect every single one of us and take away more opportunities and freedoms to grow, to progress, especially with our small businesses, as more people pay attention to that discussion on the only way to pay for this government largesse is a value added tax, borrowing more money, not drilling for our own domestic supplies of resources, but being even more reliant on foreign sources as we're headed if we say no to off shore drilling, if we keep ANWR locked up, if we're not aggressive about getting Alaska's natural gas pipeline.

HANNITY: Let me talk about the pipeline.


HANNITY: ... because you're — the natural gas pipeline in Alaska right now is a little bit of a controversy, and what's the status on that, and do you think we — look, the price of oil is going up again.

PALIN: The price of a barrel of oil is going up. There is greater demand for natural gas, it is increasing. We have to tap those north slope reserves, and we're on target to do that, and in about a week we have some really good exciting news that we great to give the rest of America on how it is that we're going to build that infrastructure. The private sector will build the infrastructure, we'll flow very rich resources of natural gas into the lower 48 states.

HANNITY: Do you miss the spotlight as much — as hot as it got during the campaign? And I had an opportunity to be out there with you on some of the busier days in your life, some of the probably more stressful days of your life, and now obviously things have quieted down. Do you prefer your time now in Alaska?

PALIN: I love my time in Alaska. At the same time, though, I crave, if not my voice, but other voices out there, being bold, being strong, letting Americans know that those who are concerned about the growth of government and about national security issues, they're not alone.

There are others who are empathizing and more than empathizing, we're wanting to take action to make sure that economically and physically that our home land is safe and secure.

HANNITY: Well, listen, I know we're going to be at some hearing from you in the future about your political future. You're not ready to announce anything today?

PALIN: Heck no.

HANNITY: But you're here to help a really good cause.

PALIN: A really good cause. We got to participate in Autism Speaks Walk, and that was a pleasure to be able to have our voices known in terms of recognizing the research needs with autism. Of course near and dear to our hearts is the issue, and anything we can do there to help, Todd and I are going to do it.

HANNITY: Did you like the Yankee game with Rudy?

PALIN: That was a blast.

HANNITY: I've been to a game with Rudy. It's fun to go to a game with Rudy.

PALIN: It was. It was fun. Everybody loved Rudy. And...

HANNITY: I heard you were pretty popular in New York.

PALIN: It was really cool. It was this once in a lifetime thing for us, spectacular facility, and all those happy faces in New York. We couldn't have asked for more.

HANNITY: They were all drinking beer.


HANNITY: I think I know them pretty well.

Governor, thank you so much for taking a few minutes.

PALIN: Thank you so much, Sean.


Watch "Hannity" weeknights at 9 p.m. ET!

Content and Programming Copyright 2009 FOX News Network, LLC. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED. Transcription Copyright 2009 CQ Transcriptions, LLC, which takes sole responsibility for the accuracy of the transcription. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED. No license is granted to the user of this material except for the user's personal or internal use and, in such case, only one copy may be printed, nor shall user use any material for commercial purposes or in any fashion that may infringe upon FOX News Network, LLC'S and CQ Transcriptions, LLC's copyrights or other proprietary rights or interests in the material. This is not a legal transcript for purposes of litigation.