In the past year we've learned a lot from our liberal femmes.
From Janeane Garofalo, we learned that if you're a female Republican, you're mentally ill.
We've learned from Sandra Bernhard that if you're Sarah Palin, you'd be raped in New York.
And about Miss California, the pointless E News anchor Giuliana Rancic tweets, "I know I'm a journalist... but she is an ignorant disgrace and she makes me sick to my stomach."
I got news for you Rancic: You may be the only one who knows you're a journalist.
What do all these targets of derision have in common? Well, they aren't liberal and they're women — that's obvious. But more important: The people attacking them are women.
So why are female libs often the most spiteful when it comes to female non-libs? I'm no shrink, but I think it has something to do with regret. The fact is, women buying into the hard leftist, feminist ideal can't stand it when they see women who haven't.
And the fact is, when chicks like Garofalo are miserable they start thinking their enemies might be onto something.
She's right. Her female foes don't buy into notions that acting like a man makes you a better woman. Which is why most men gravitate toward those girls for the long haul — mainly because the quick roll ain't happening.
Finally, while I disagree with Miss California on gay marriage, I can tell she's a decent person, which is more than I can say for Perez Hilton. Fact is, I don't give a damn about his sexual orientation. You can paint a turd pink, but it's still a turd.
And if you disagree with me, then you sir are worse than Hitler.