When you obstruct justice, the idea is you are obstructing getting at the truth.
That's why the problem for Martha wasn't that she might have sold stock in a company based on inside information — that stock sale never came up — only that she might have tried to cover her tracks long after the sale was made.
It's the same thing that brought down Richard Nixon (search) — not a break-in into Democratic National Committee headquarters, but the administration's efforts subsequently to cover up all activity "since" that break-in.
For Libby, the issue is whether he lied about what he did "after" the fact. Again, it's not so much whether he did or did not reveal a CIA operative's name, but if he obstructed justice by impeding the investigation into whether he did.
I know it's confusing. But here's what is not: The crime isn't the act that gets you. It's what you did, or didn't do, after it.
Click here to order your signed copy of Neil's new book, "Your Money or Your Life."
Watch Neil Cavuto weekdays at 4 p.m. ET on "Your World with Cavuto" and send your comments to email@example.com