Ex-Obama adviser Jason Furman rips Biden's student loan handout as ‘inflationary,’ ‘reckless’ overreach

close

Video

Fox News Flash top headlines for August 24

Fox News Flash top headlines are here. Check out what's clicking on Foxnews.com.

Former Barack Obama economic adviser Jason Furman went on a lengthy Twitter rant on Wednesday afternoon ripping President Biden’s student loan handout as "inflationary," "reckless," and government overreach.

"Pouring roughly half trillion dollars of gasoline on the inflationary fire that is already burning is reckless," tweeted Furman, who served as chairman of the president’s Council of Economic Advisers during the Obama-Biden administration. "Doing it while going well beyond one campaign promise ($10K of student loan relief) and breaking another (all proposals paid for) is even worse."

Furman made his comments shortly after Biden announced Wednesday an executive order to cancel $10,000 for each student loan borrower, $20,000 for borrowers who received Pell Grants, and extend a repayment pause through Dec. 31.

The handout only applies to borrowers earning less than $125,000 a year — $250,000 for married couples — and undergraduate loan borrowers can cap repayment at 5% of their monthly income, Biden said.

President Biden's student loan handout is "reckless," a former top Obama adviser is warning. (SAUL LOEB/AFP via Getty Images)

BIDEN ANNOUNCES STUDENT LOAN HANDOUT AS NATIONAL DEBT SOARS

The White House released a fact sheet explaining how the program will benefit lower- and middle-income graduates. Furman pointed out, however, that married couples earning $249,000 are also eligible for the handout. 

"The White House fact sheet has sympathetic examples about a construction worker making $38K and a married nurse making $77,000 a year," he wrote. "But then why design a policy that would provide up to $40,000 to a married couple making $249,000? Why include law and business school students?

"BTW, those examples also contradict the baseline some have concocted to claim that this won't raise inflation," Furman continued. "The claim it won't raise inflation is based on the construction worker going from permanently paying $0 interest to paying $31 a month at an annual cost of $372.

"You can't use one baseline (interest payments suspended) to argue this will constrain demand & then a different baseline (interest payments restored) to describe the benefits," he added. "That is incoherent, inconsistent & indefensible cherry picking – I hope the White House doesn't do it."

Former top Obama economic adviser Jason Furman is sounding the alarm about President Biden's student loan handout. Furman is warning that Biden will make inflation even worse. (Screenshot/MSNBC)

Furman then echoed what many experts have been saying — that the handout will incentivize colleges to raise tuition prices and cause students to overborrow.

"Also need to be careful with all of the distributional numbers because the beneficiaries will tend to have higher lifetime incomes than current incomes," he tweeted. "A 24 year-old making $75,000 is likely to be at a relatively high percentile on a lifetime basis.

"There are a number of other highly problematic impacts including encouraging higher tuition in the future, encouraging more borrowing, creating expectations of future debt forgiveness, and more," Furman said. "Most importantly, everyone else will pay for this either in the form of higher inflation or in higher taxes or lower benefits in the future."

President Biden ignored inflation concerns in announcing his student loan handout. (AP Photo/Susan Walsh)

Furman added that he’s troubled by the unilateral power Biden is wielding with his order, and that it would be more appropriate for Congress to pass legislation.

CLICK HERE TO GET THE FOX NEWS APP

"Finally, it's not obvious to me that this is reasonable for a President to do unilaterally," he said. "A number of lawyers (and political leaders) have argued inconsistent with the law. Even if technically legal I don't like this amount of unilateral Presidential power.

"P.S. I like the reforms to income-driven repayment," Furman concluded. "But I would much rather have seen them passed by Congress as part of a law that fully paid for them rather than done unilaterally and unpaid for in the context of an already extremely expensive package."