Updated October 26, 2009
Afghanistan Matters Because of Pakistan
, FOXNews.com
It’s become a mantra in some quarters that we have to "win" in Afghanistan before we tackle Pakistan. It’s really the other way around -- we need to help Zardari defeat the Taliban in Pakistan or our efforts in Afghanistan -- no matter how significant or successful -- will be for naught.
President Obama is taking his time deciding what to do next in Afghanistan. Never mind that he’s rethinking a war he declared a "war of necessity" just a few short months ago. Never mind that the longer he dithers the less chance we have of turning around a war we’re losing. Never mind that politically, Afghanistan is a damned if you do, damned if you don’t sort of war.
Obama needs to face it -- there are no good options left with Afghanistan. But he also needs to focus on the main event -- it’s not just Afghanistan anymore, it’s Pakistan. An unstable Afghanistan could once again become a safe haven for terrorists. But so could Somalia or Algeria or Yemen. But an unstable Pakistan carries the added risk that nuclear weapons could fall into the hands of anti-American Islamic extremists. And that’s the greater national security threat to the United States.
That doesn’t mean we should invade Pakistan -- it would be counter-productive. But we finally have a partner in Pakistan’s President Zardari who is willing to take the fight to the Taliban and has begun rooting them out of the tribal areas along the Afghan border. We should support Zardari -- with both military assistance to help their fight, and with economic assistance to build their economy.
Pakistan’s main problem is its failed economy. As such it has become a recruitment center for Islamic extremists, suicide bombers and terrorists. There are lots of reasons for this, but none of them irreversible. And, never in the history of the world has there been a poor country on the border of a rich country that hasn’t benefited from the crumbs that fall from its table. India's economic miracle wasn't replicated in Pakistan. But it should be.
President Obama needs to confer now with Britain and India to decide how we can work together to spur Pakistan’s economy and build their middle class. Britain has a long history in the region and it's main internal threat comes from Pakistani-affiliated sleeper cells. India realizes now that an unstable Pakistan is a greater threat to its security than a strong Pakistan ever was.
Increased foreign assistance budgets aren’t enough. We need a Marshall Plan for Pakistan, with other countries helping to foot the bill.
It’s become a mantra in some quarters that we have to "win" in Afghanistan before we tackle Pakistan. It’s really the other way around -- we need to help Zardari defeat the Taliban in Pakistan or our efforts in Afghanistan -- no matter how significant or successful -- will be for naught.
Kathleen Troia "K.T." McFarland served in national security posts in the Nixon, Ford and Reagan administrations. She is frequent contributor to the FOX Forum and Foxnews.com's "Strategy Room." She also appears weekly in the Foxnews.com video blog "DefCon3."
Fox Nation
-
Rev. Wright Re-emerges: 'Don't Call Me the Controversial Rev. Wright ...'
November 21, 2009 52 comments
-
McCain Risks Losing Senate Seat
November 20, 2009 369 comments
-
Candidate Enters Race for Fake NH-00 Congressional District
November 20, 2009 34 comments
-
Pelosi: Bin Laden Could Be Read Miranda Rights
November 20, 2009 247 comments
-
Hoffman Considering Recount Claim
November 20, 2009 29 comments
-
9/11 Trial Could Cost Taxpayers Over $100M
November 20, 2009 131 comments
-
Gore Plugs Florescent Lightbulbs On NBC's "30 Rock"
November 20, 2009 72 comments
-
Colbert, Letterman Amazed How "Cool" Obama Is
November 20, 2009 111 comments
-
Waxman on Health Care Bill: 'We Can Build on It Later'
November 20, 2009 92 comments
-
Ben Nelson Threatens Filibuster
November 20, 2009 49 comments
Most Commented
-
Why is the White House Still Attacking Fox News?
October 19, 2009 2,226 comments
-
Did 'Curb' and HBO Cross the Line?
October 28, 2009 1,430 comments
-
Should Justice Investigate ACORN?
September 10, 2009 1,396 comments
-
Do You Agree With Decision to Release Lockerbie Bomber?
August 20, 2009 1,275 comments
-
Did Carter Cross the Line?
September 16, 2009 1,208 comments
-
Interview with Meb Keflezighi: Running Man
November 20, 2009
-
Matthew Kaminski: Selling Meg Whitman in California
November 20, 2009
-
The End of HSAs
November 20, 2009
-
Why We're Not 'Post-Racial'
November 20, 2009
-
Obama Union Rules
November 20, 2009
-
Peter Mandelson bets on two sure-fire losers
November 21, 2009
-
Sadly, most people with a learning disability should not have children
November 21, 2009
-
Wind of deceit drives Labour’s green energy plan
November 21, 2009
-
A game of two halves: cheating and whining
November 21, 2009
-
Belle lays bare the myth that every hooker is a victim
November 21, 2009
-
Religion and Capitalism
November 21, 2009 10 comments
-
New York Times Gets One Right
November 20, 2009 7 comments
-
The True Cost of the Health Care Bills
November 20, 2009 6 comments
-
Legal Theft
November 20, 2009 6 comments
-
Rewarding Incompetence
November 19, 2009 25 comments



recommend

Subscribe to Comments
