• Video
  • Radio
  • Mobile
  • U-Report
  • iMag
FOX News.com
            
  • What's Hot
  • Iceberg Spotted Off Australia
  • Girl Sneezes 12,000 Times a Day
  • H1N1 Vaccine Map

  • Watch Live
  • STRATEGY ROOM
  • Bloomberg Wash. Summit
  • State Department Briefing
Breaking News CDC: 22 Million H1N1 Cases in U.S. From April to October

Politics

  • Politics Home
    • FOX Polls
    • America's Election HQ
    • Supreme Court
    • Special Report
    • Fox News Sunday
    • Executive Branch
    • U.S. Senate
    • House of Representatives
    • State & Local Government
    • U.S. Military
    • NEWS ARCHIVE
    • HOT TOPICS
      • H1N1
      • Small Business
      • Health Care
    • SECTION MAP
FOXNEWS.COM HOME > POLITICS

Mass. Gay Nups Change Rejected

Wednesday, September 14, 2005

  • E-Mail
  • Print
  • Share:
    • Digg
    • Facebook
    • StumbleUpon
    • MySpace

BOSTON —  The Massachusetts Legislature on Wednesday rejected a proposed constitutional amendment that sought to ban gay marriage (search) but legalize civil unions, a year after the state performed the nation's first government-sanctioned same-sex weddings.

It was the second time the Legislature had confronted the measure, which was intended to be put before voters on a statewide ballot in 2006. Under state law, lawmakers were required to approve it in two consecutive sessions before it could move forward.

After less than two hours of debate Wednesday, a joint session of the House and Senate voted 157-39 against the measure.

It was a striking departure from a year earlier, when hundreds of protesters converged on Beacon Hill (search) and sharply divided legislators spent long hours debating the issue. In that session, in March 2004, lawmakers voted 105-92 in favor of the amendment.

This year, the crowds were tamer and some legislators who had initially supported the proposed change to the state constitution said they no longer felt right about denying the right of marriage to thousands of same-sex couples.

"Gay marriage has begun, and life has not changed for the citizens of the commonwealth, with the exception of those who can now marry," said state Sen. Brian Lees (search), a Republican who had been a co-sponsor of the amendment. "This amendment which was an appropriate measure or compromise a year ago, is no longer, I feel, a compromise today."

Related

  • Stories

    • Schwarzenegger's Promised Gay Marriage Veto Gets Lukewarm Response
    • Schwarzenegger to Veto Calif. Gay Nups Bill
    • Stage Set for Mass. Anti-Gay Nups Petition
    • California Legislature Approves Gay Marriage
    • Lutherans Rebuff Gay Clergy, Marriage Proposals
    • Straight Path to Gay Marriage
    • Canada Legalizes Gay Marriage
    • Protestant Church Endorses Gay Marriage
    • Spain's Parliament Legalizes Gay Marriage
    • Hundreds of Thousands Protest Gay Marriage Bill in Madrid
    • N.Y. Mayor To Go On Trial For Gay Marriages
    • Poll: 50 Percent Disapprove of Gay Marriage
    • Texas House OKs Gay Marriage Ban
    • Ore. Court Nullifies Gay Marriage Licenses

The proposal also was opposed by critics of gay marriage, who want to push for a more restrictive measure.

"The union of two women and two men can never consummate a marriage. It's physically impossible," said state Rep. Phil Travis, a Democrat. "The other 49 states are right and we are wrong."

Lawmakers already are preparing for a battle over another proposed amendment that would ban both gay marriage and civil unions. The earliest that initiative could end up on the ballot is 2008.

The state's highest court ruled in November 2003 that same-sex couples had a right under the state constitution to marry. The first weddings took place on May 17, 2004 — two months after lawmakers began the process of trying to change the constitution to reverse the court's ruling.

Since then, more than 6,100 couples have married.

Within a year of the first Massachusetts marriages, 11 states pushed through constitutional amendments banning gay marriage, joining six others that had done so earlier.

The Connecticut Legislature approved civil unions in April, joining Vermont in creating the designation that creates the same legal rights as marriage without calling it such. Earlier this month, California lawmakers passed legislation legalizing same-sex marriage, though Gov. Arnold Schwarzenegger has promised to veto it.

Although more than 6,100 same-sex couples were married in Massachusetts, the state barred out-of-state couples from getting married here, citing a 1913 law that prohibits couples from marrying in Massachusetts if their union would be illegal in their home states. A lawsuit challenging the legality of that law is pending before the SJC.

  • See Next Story in Politics
  • E-Mail
  • Print
  • Share:
    • Digg
    • Facebook
    • StumbleUpon
    • MySpace

FOX NEWS VIDEOS



TOP VIDEOS

Afghan ambassador pushing back on Obama

Mistakes in counting of stimulus jobs

Shortfalls leave states in fiscal crisis

Politics

  • Can Bill Clinton help health care push?
  • Obama makes remarks on economy
  • Tea Party Express finishes 20-day tour
  • Malkin: Numerous red flags overlooked
ADVERTISEMENT

most active

Articles

  • Most Read
  • Most Emailed
  • More News
  • 1

    Maclaren Recalls One Million Strollers After Kids Lose Fingertips in Hinges

    »

  • 2

    Framed for Child Porn by a PC Virus

    »

  • 3

    Cord Blood Reverses Cerebral Palsy in Colorado Girl

    »

  • 4

    Tequila: 5 Things You Didn't Know

    »

  • 5

    Legendary Lost Persian Army Found in Sahara

    »

  • 6

    Fort Hood Suspect Warned of Muslim Threat Within Military

    »

  • 7

    Massachusetts Man Says He Was Fired for Telling Colleague Her Gay Marriage Is Wrong

    »

  • 8

    Muggers Return Wallet After Seeing Army ID

    »

  • 9

    New York-Based Radical Muslim Hails Fort Hood Massacre

    »

  • 10

    Vatican Seeks Signs of Alien Life

    »

  • More News

ADVERTISEMENT

ONLY ON FOX

  • Supreme Court Scorecard

    A summary of the high court's decisions on 70 cases presented during the 2007-2008 term
  • 2008 Primary Schedule

    A handy list of who voted when
  • Leaving Congress: The Changing Face of the 110th

    Click here to see the updated list of lawmakers not returning to their seats after the 2008 elections

Marketplace

  • Autos
  • Mortgages
Find a Car
Find a Mortgage
Get Voicemail
See Your Score $0
Fox News Shop
Celebrity News
Lifestyle Magazine
Nationwide Insurance Save up to $500
iPhone FOX Business Download the App

  • Home
  • U.S.
  • World
  • Politics
  • Health
  • Business
  • SciTech
  • Entertainment
  • Video
  • Opinion
  • Sports
  • Leisure
  • Careers
  • Internships - FNCU
  • Fox Around the World
  • RSS Feeds

  • Advertise With Us
  • Terms of Use
  • Privacy Policy
  • Contact Us
  • Email FOXNews.com Newsroom

This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed. © 2009 FOX News Network, LLC. All rights reserved. All market data delayed 20 minutes.