Updated October 27, 2009
Eco-Nuts Out to Destroy Life As We Know It
, FOXNews.com
While Al Qaeda and eco-nuts use different tactics, they share a similar enemy: civilization.
Around the globe on Saturday environmental protesters tried “a synchronized burst of more than 4,300 demonstrations, from the Himalayas to the Great Barrier Reef,” according to The New York Times.
The sweeping October 24 protest was to bully developed nations like the United States into a climate change agreement when they meet in Copenhagen this December.
The 350.org protesters, who want to drop CO2 in the atmosphere to that level, were especially critical of the United States:
“You have destroyed nature with your industrial waste and gases more than any other nation in history. Despite this, you refuse to sign the Kyoto agreement so that you can secure the profit of your greedy companies and industries.”
Oops, that’s wasn’t the eco-nuts, that’s a direct quote from Usama bin Laden in 2002. --While Al Qaeda and eco-nuts use different tactics, they share a similar enemy: civilization.
At least Al Qaeda is clear about what it wants -- an end to Western civilization and establishment of global Shariah law -- the Islamic version of cave men times with better architecture.
The eco-nuts have a patchwork of things they hate and want banned or destroyed. The week of the 350 protests, The Times wrote glowingly about the Swedes are now including carbon footprint labeling on all food. The Times’ Elisabeth Rosenthal was quick to point out “changing one’s diet can be as effective in reducing emissions of climate-changing gases as changing the car one drives or doing away with the clothes dryer, scientific experts say.” I love it when people who have a huge subway system at their disposal bemoan the automobile.
The new labeling guidelines were a predictable attempt to manipulate what people eat. “[T]hey are advised to substitute beans or chicken for red meat,” the October 22 article proclaimed. The left hasn’t bestowed human rights on beans…yet.
Two days later, London’s Daily Express complained that Fido was a global threat as well. “A medium-sized dog has the same carbon impact as a Toyota Land Cruiser driven 6,000 miles a year, a new book claims,” wrote the paper. It went on to blast pets -- from cats to hamsters -- because they use energy. Now I guess lefties can blame previous warming cycles on buffalo (or their SUVs).
We should be used to this theme. The left is on a global campaign to wipe out the trappings of civilization and the media pretend it’s for our good. In a headlong rush to stop something many scientists dispute, the left wants to ban human invention, accomplishment and enjoyment. The media, which reluctantly admit Al Qaeda is somehow bad, can’t muster the same honesty about the eco-movement.
Enviro-wackos in the nuclear-free zone of Takoma Park, Maryland., are trying to ban leaf blowers. Styrofoam and plastic bags are doomed to a similar end under the all-seeing, lidless eye of the morals police. California is on the verge of banning big screen TVs because they also use too much energy. (Take that sports bars.) The Golden state is also banning a ship used in the movie “Pirates of the Caribbean” because it has a diesel engine.
The European Union has already begun its ban on traditional light bulbs and the U.S. Congress has passed that little bit of environmental insanity as well. Forget actual light, the world is being forced to rely on mercury-laden bulbs that will, in turn, become a future eco-disaster. The film “No Impact Man” highlighted lefties who tried to live as backward as possible to save Mother Nature. The news media have celebrated that and even dwelled on the no-diaper movement. (Ewwwww!)
Of course it doesn’t stop there. It’s one thing to limit our packaging, our technology and underwear. Goveg.com, a pro-vegetarian Web site, enlisted rock stars Paul McCartney and Chrissie Hynde to go after the meat industry -- “one of the leading sources of the greenhouse gases that lead to global warming.”
Why ban food when you can get rid of people? A researcher from the World Health Organization had the audacity to come out and complain about the “lack of access to family planning.” The left wants to limit human population via birth control.
That’s reminiscent of Paul Watson, founder and president of the Sea Shepherd Conservation Society, who wants to “re-wild the planet.” In the process, this star of Animal Planet’s “Whale Wars” prefers to see humans die off and wants the human population to drop below 1 billion. That’s 5.5 billion folks who will become expendable, though I doubt they’d agree.
That is the natural culmination the left is working toward. Just like communist China, they will move to limit births. When that isn’t enough, who knows how far they will go in their orthodoxy?
To hear Al Gore tell it, the battle against global warming is reminiscent of World War II. In July, he told an English audience, “Winston Churchill aroused this nation in heroic fashion to save civilization in World War II.”
Yes, but Britain was on the side of civilization. The eco-nuts are not.
Dan Gainor is The Boone Pickens Fellow and the Media Research Center’s Vice President for Business and Culture. He writes frequently for the Fox Forum and can be seen as a guest on Foxnews.com’s “Strategy Room.” He can also be contacted on FaceBook and Twitter as dangainor.
Fox Nation
-
Rev. Wright Re-emerges: 'Don't Call Me the Controversial Rev. Wright ...'
November 21, 2009 51 comments
-
McCain Risks Losing Senate Seat
November 20, 2009 368 comments
-
Candidate Enters Race for Fake NH-00 Congressional District
November 20, 2009 34 comments
-
Pelosi: Bin Laden Could Be Read Miranda Rights
November 20, 2009 246 comments
-
Hoffman Considering Recount Claim
November 20, 2009 29 comments
-
9/11 Trial Could Cost Taxpayers Over $100M
November 20, 2009 131 comments
-
Gore Plugs Florescent Lightbulbs On NBC's "30 Rock"
November 20, 2009 69 comments
-
Colbert, Letterman Amazed How "Cool" Obama Is
November 20, 2009 111 comments
-
Waxman on Health Care Bill: 'We Can Build on It Later'
November 20, 2009 92 comments
-
Ben Nelson Threatens Filibuster
November 20, 2009 49 comments
Most Commented
-
Why is the White House Still Attacking Fox News?
October 19, 2009 2,226 comments
-
Did 'Curb' and HBO Cross the Line?
October 28, 2009 1,430 comments
-
Should Justice Investigate ACORN?
September 10, 2009 1,396 comments
-
Do You Agree With Decision to Release Lockerbie Bomber?
August 20, 2009 1,275 comments
-
Did Carter Cross the Line?
September 16, 2009 1,208 comments
-
Interview with Meb Keflezighi: Running Man
November 20, 2009
-
Matthew Kaminski: Selling Meg Whitman in California
November 20, 2009
-
The End of HSAs
November 20, 2009
-
Why We're Not 'Post-Racial'
November 20, 2009
-
Obama Union Rules
November 20, 2009
-
Peter Mandelson bets on two sure-fire losers
November 21, 2009
-
Sadly, most people with a learning disability should not have children
November 21, 2009
-
Wind of deceit drives Labour’s green energy plan
November 21, 2009
-
A game of two halves: cheating and whining
November 21, 2009
-
Belle lays bare the myth that every hooker is a victim
November 21, 2009
-
Religion and Capitalism
November 21, 2009 10 comments
-
New York Times Gets One Right
November 20, 2009 7 comments
-
The True Cost of the Health Care Bills
November 20, 2009 6 comments
-
Legal Theft
November 20, 2009 6 comments
-
Rewarding Incompetence
November 19, 2009 25 comments



recommend

Subscribe to Comments
