Updated July 15, 2009
The Eye-Popping Cost of Obamacare
, FOXNews.com
Guess what? Everything we've ever heard about the Democrats plan for health care reform is true. And it's not a pretty picture.
The House Democrats released their long-awaited draft health care reform bill today, and every rumor about what tax hikes would be included was true--and then some. My friend Ryan Ellis over at Americans for Tax Reform posted the details.
The big shocker is that the surtax on high-income earners, including small businesses, is much steeper than the rumored 3 percent that I talked about in my podcast yesterday. Instead it's 5.4 percent. Not of taxable income, mind you, but of adjusted gross income. That means the tax applies to income that was spent on home mortgage interest, medical expenses, property taxes, charitable contributions, and nearly everything else currently deducted from taxable income.
Combined with President Obama's plan to repeal the Bush tax cuts on schedule in 2011, this would mean hiking the top marginal capital gains tax rate from 15 percent to 25.4 percent--much higher than Obama promised on the campaign trail, and near the 28 percent rate from before the 1997 Bill Clinton tax cuts. Such a tax hike would slam the brakes on capital formation and wallop capital markets with another gut punch just as they are finally beginning to recover from the financial crisis. It would also dramatically inhibit badly needed business investment.
The tax hit on capital gains, however, would pale compared to the new top rate on ordinary income, already scheduled to go from 35% to 39.6 percent in 2011, but now pushed up to 45 percent with the new surtax, and actually substantially higher than that as a percentage of taxable income because the new 5.4 percent surtax is applied to AGI.
Such punitive income tax rates would be a huge impediment to business activity throughout the economy, especially for the small and medium-sized business that create nearly all of the new employment that we need to lead us out of the recession.
And it actually gets a lot worse. Employers would also be mandated to provide health insurance under the bill, and the cost of health insurance would likely skyrocket because of new regulations called guaranteed issue and community rating. The only alternative, which many companies would either be forced into by cost considerations or choose for simplicity, would be to pay a payroll tax of as much as 8 percent. That's on top of the existing 15.3 percent payroll tax for Social Security and Medicare, creating a new total payroll tax of 23.3 percent.
There would also be a new tax on individuals who don't have health insurance, flying in the face of President Obama's key primary campaign promise not to require people to be insured. That tax would be another 2.5 percent of AGI.
These eye-popping numbers, of course, don't include state and local taxes, which are also rising in most of the country.
The tax hikes in this bill represent the last piece of the puzzle--along with loose monetary policy and high government spending--to repeat the key economic blunders of the 1970s, with all the misery that came with them.
Phil Kerpen is director of policy for Americans for Prosperity, which runs the anti-stimulus Web site www.NoStimulus.com. He can be reached through www.philkerpen.com and his free daily podcast is available here.
Fox Nation
-
"SNL" Destroy Obama Over Spending
November 22, 2009 18 comments
-
NYT Op-ed: Conservatives Cause Ft. Hood
November 22, 2009 23 comments
-
Dowd Rips Obama, Says He Could Learn From Palin
November 22, 2009 38 comments
-
Is Obamacare A Ponzi Scheme?
November 22, 2009 50 comments
-
Bishop Bans Rep. Kennedy From Communion
November 22, 2009 99 comments
-
Glenn Beck Reveals "The Plan"
November 22, 2009 226 comments
-
9/11 Suspects Seek Show Trial
November 22, 2009 132 comments
-
Rev. Wright Re-emerges: 'Don't Call Me the Controversial Rev. Wright ...'
November 21, 2009 56 comments
-
McCain Risks Losing Senate Seat
November 20, 2009 364 comments
-
Candidate Enters Race for Fake NH-00 Congressional District
November 20, 2009 37 comments
Most Commented
-
Why is the White House Still Attacking Fox News?
October 19, 2009 2,226 comments
-
Did 'Curb' and HBO Cross the Line?
October 28, 2009 1,430 comments
-
Should Justice Investigate ACORN?
September 10, 2009 1,397 comments
-
Do You Agree With Decision to Release Lockerbie Bomber?
August 20, 2009 1,275 comments
-
Did Carter Cross the Line?
September 16, 2009 1,208 comments
-
Reuel Marc Gerecht: Major Hasan and Holy War
November 22, 2009
-
No Bondholder Left Behind
November 23, 2009
-
O'Grady: The End of Bolivian Democracy
November 22, 2009
-
The Senate's Health-Care Act
November 22, 2009
-
Cyclones and Global Warming
November 22, 2009
-
Alas, it’s the end of the road for petrolheads
November 22, 2009
-
A gross insult to the people of Europe
November 22, 2009
-
Rule the waves? Not any more we don’t
November 22, 2009
-
They’re still wriggling to avoid the flak on Iraq
November 22, 2009
-
Copenhagen will fail – and quite right too
November 22, 2009
-
Religion and Capitalism
November 21, 2009 10 comments
-
New York Times Gets One Right
November 20, 2009 7 comments
-
The True Cost of the Health Care Bills
November 20, 2009 6 comments
-
Legal Theft
November 20, 2009 6 comments
-
Rewarding Incompetence
November 19, 2009 25 comments



recommend


Subscribe to Comments
