You asked Neil Cavuto and Maria Bartiromo what evidence there is to suggest that Obama wants to "take away our guns?" They responded, essentially, that there is no real such evidence. Really?!? The president's -- and Hillary's -- open praise of the system forced on the Australian people by its government is evidence enough!
Donald Trump and the media are doing America a "huge" favor by discussing Sen. Cruz's birth eligibility during the primary phase. This is the proverbial "elephant in the room" question that Cruz and GOP bigwigs have tried to ignore. Forcing resolution of the birth issue now can prevent post-primary pandemonium for the GOP if Cruz is nominated -- and if he's elected it can avoid a "huge" post-election crisis that makes Bush-Gore of 2000 seem minor....
So breaking "journalism's" alleged cardinal rules of honesty deserves a second chance? What exactly does Williams have to do to get booted - disagree or expose progressives? Foolish acts again lead to credibility problems for the "media" and another excuse for regular people to lie, cheat, and steal (Hello, Bill Clinton?).
I record and watch your show regularly. However, today I fast forwarded the entire show. I will continue to do this to every Fox program that wastes my time with babble of Trump. The only reason his poll numbers is because we hear almost nothing about what and where the other candidates are.
Did you ever notice that in the media nobody ever asks, when the parrots of the political talking points say we need common sense gun laws, that the moderators never ask them to say exactly and very specifically what are these common sense gun laws they want besides the so-called gun show loophole, as sane people have already figured out that's a back door to stop law abiding citizens from selling or trading any gun with anyone?
Media can be a "conduit of propaganda" as mentioned on your show. It may be about awareness and proportion: Awareness that at times the press should temper news coverage without excessive repetition or unchecked content. How much does the public really "need to know" at a given time? If media merely fills airtime with endless repetition of extreme violent events in the guise of news reporting, the press magnifies the celebrity of perpetrators... and serves as their propaganda vehicle.
Why didn't you say the high negative rating for @RealBenCarson last week was due to a "high tech lynching" by @CNN, @politico?
When there is an obvious damaging error in reporting by the "mainstream liberal media" we conservatists (sic) blindly blame it simply on "the media", soon to be forgotten. The media is made up of persons, and some author wrote that erroneous article and is personally responsible. When calling the error to the public's attention, why do we not routinely expose that author by name, not just the nameless media?