It is the job of the media in general, and news organizations specifically to report the facts. We, the public, do not need your interpretation of anything. We can decide for ourselves what these things mean.
Headline writers are the bottom feeders of journalism. All many people look at are the headlines. Responsible journalists can write a balanced story but the whole thing can be sabotaged by a bad headline. Aren’t there any journalistic ethical principles for headlines?
There is no question there is a difference in how the media covers Trump and the protected way they cover Hillary, even when she ignores them. It’s ironic that Trump will attempt to answer any question thrown at him, while Hillary gives the media few opportunities, other than under friendly and controlled situations, to ask real questions. Most seem to be softballs.
Does The Donald's nomination conclusively demonstrate that the media will do ANYTHING for ratings?
You didn't deal today with the real reasons for the backlash with Megyn regarding Donald Trump. The blowback is, as you must know, the hypocrisy and lack of balance at the network. It’s moving away from its core audience to pursue audience growth from center left. Not sure it will work.
If you don't think FOX went on a 24/7 pro Trump tirade, you've been absent for months
There’s something terribly missing in the media from all sources about the Trump Rally’s. They all have a way of blaming or insinuating that Donald J Trump is responsible for all the demonstrations at his rallies, when actually, they should be looking at the ROOT CAUSE of these demonstrations. Someone, some groups, or groups outside the Trump organizations are definitely responsible for these disruptions...
Where were all these people now outraged about the rules when Ron Paul was getting screwed over at the convention? There was only passing media coverage on that. Four years late on the outrage, guys.