The United States finds itself on both sides of the Sunni-Shiite conflict in the Middle East. In Yemen, helping the Saudi-led effort against the Iranian-backed Houthi rebels. And in Iraq, fighting on the same side as Iran in the effort to take Tikrit from the terror group ISIS. The chaos threatens ongoing nuclear talks with Iran, as well as the White House’s terror strategy as a whole. We’ll discuss the possibility of regional war in the Middle East, and the Obama administration’s handling of it all, exclusively with retired U.S. Army Lt. Gen. Michael Flynn, former Director of the Defense Intelligence Agency.
Benjamin Netanyahu on Alleged Rift With President Obama, Mideast Peace Process
Written by Chris Wallace / Published July 11, 2010 / Fox News Sunday
Special Guests: Benjamin Netanyahu
The following is a rush transcript of the July 11, 2010, edition of "Fox News Sunday With Chris Wallace." This copy may not be in its final form and may be updated.
CHRIS WALLACE, ANCHOR: Israeli Prime Minister Netanyahu was in the U.S. this week to repair relations with President Obama and to make the case he wants peace more than anyone. We sat down with him to discuss reports of a rift with the White House, Iran's nuclear program, and what's holding up the peace process.
WALLACE: Prime Minister Netanyahu, welcome back to "Fox News Sunday."
ISRAELI PRIME MINISTER BENJAMIN NETANYAHU: Thank you. Very good to be with you, Chris.
WALLACE: There's been a lot of chatter this week about direct talks with the Palestinians, but I want to start with what there is to negotiate. Do you really believe that you can make peace with the Palestinians when Hamas controls Gaza, has a lot of support in the West Bank and won't recognize Israel's right to exist?
NETANYAHU: I don't think we can make peace with an organization that seeks our destruction. That's Hamas. But I think we can make peace with the Palestinian Authority. It requires a lot of courage from our side, from me. And it also requires courage from President Mahmoud Abbas, the president of the Palestinian Authority.
It's going to be a very tough negotiation, but one that I think our peoples are ripe for. Is Hamas going to be a part of it? No. As long as it wants to destroy Israel, it's not going to be a part of it.
Now, at this point, I could tell you we'll never negotiate with the Palestinian Authority as long as Hamas is in Gaza. That's not my position. I think we should get on with it and seek to negotiate peace between Israel and the Palestinian Authority. We'll have to deal with Hamas later.
WALLACE: But your foreign minister, Avigdor Lieberman, says he sees, quote, "no chance" -- no chance -- of a Palestinian state by 2012.
NETANYAHU: Well, you know, there are different views. There are people who have different ideas. We're a democracy. We're a parliamentary democracy. So people are entitled to have different views. They express them.
But I think that there is no substitute for getting into direct talks right now and seeking to break this logger jam, to actually go ahead and try to negotiate a final peace settlement.
WALLACE: Do you believe there can be a Palestinian state by 2012?
NETANYAHU: I think there can be a solution. It may be implemented over time, because time is an important factor of getting the solution, both in terms of security arrangements and other things that would be difficult if they're not allowed to take place over time.
So I think the -- can we have a negotiated peace? Yes. Can it be implemented by 2012? I think it's going to take longer than that.
WALLACE: You say it will take courage on your part. Are you willing to put East Jerusalem as a possible capital of the Palestinian state on the table?
NETANYAHU: Well, we have differences of views with the Palestinians. We want a united city. They have their own views. We can -- this is one of the issues that will have to be negotiated. But I think the main point is to get on with it.
You know, somebody asked me today, "Why don't you negotiate with President Abbas?" I said I've been calling for a year and a quarter, ever since we formed the government, to have this negotiation. And the question I raise is what are we waiting for. What are we wasting more time for? Let's just get on with it.
WALLACE: President Obama and you this week were full of nice words about U.S.-Israeli relations, but I think the real question is did you resolve some of the deep differences that exist between the United States and Israel when it comes to some of these issues.
So let's get into specifics. Did the president explain why the U.S. signed a U.N. statement in May which singled out Israel's nuclear program and failed to mention Iran?
NETANYAHU: He said U.S. policy has not changed. He recognizes Israel's unique circumstances of size, vulnerability, the history of the attacks that we've had. And he reiterated in our private session and in the public statement some of the key understandings that we've had on this strategic area.
So I think if anyone thought that there was a change of U.S. policy or daylight between Israel and the United States on these questions, I think - - I think he did a lot to lay that to rest.
WALLACE: Did he explicitly say to you that he accepts Israel's right to nuclear weapons for self-defense?
NETANYAHU: Well, we didn't -- we didn't get into that kind of a discussion and I'm not going to get into our confidential discussions.
WALLACE: What about the call, which the U.S. endorsed at the U.N., for an international conference, a summit, on making the Mideast a nuclear- free zone?
NETANYAHU: He said that he would not see Israel joining if it didn't feel comfortable with such a conference, and I think that was an important statement.
As far as a nuclear weapons-free zone, you know, when the lion lies down with the lamb, and you don't need a new lamb every day to satisfy the lion, then we might have this kind of transformation in the Middle East.
But so far, you know who's been violating the nuclear nonproliferation pact day and night? Those who signed it. Iran, Iraq, Libya and Iran violates it while calling for Israel's destruction and racing to develop atomic weapons to that end.
So I think we should stay focused on the real problem in the Middle East. It's not Israel. It's these dictatorships that are developing nuclear weapons with the specific goal of wiping Israel away.
WALLACE: Have you and the president resolved the issue of whether you are willing to extend the moratorium on construction of settlements as part of the Palestinians engaging in direct talks?
NETANYAHU: The settlements are an issue that have to be engaged in the final status peace negotiations. That's always been agreed on, along with other issues.
I made the exceptional, really extraordinary, move of making a freeze on new construction for 10 months -- I did that seven months ago -- in order to help the Palestinians get in the talks. They haven't gotten into the talks right now.
Now we're asked to make an extension of this. Look, I think this is - - this is the wrong approach. I think we should eliminate all these preconditions and all these excuses and all those demands for entering into direct talks. We should just get into them.
WALLACE: During your meeting with President Obama, you praised the recent round of sanctions, not just the U.N., but also the additional sanctions that President Obama signed, that the U.S. Congress passed, on Iran.
But recently, the CIA director, Leon Panetta, said this, "Will it deter them" -- speaking of the Iranians -- "from their ambitions with regards to a nuclear capability? Probably not." Is Panetta right?
NETANYAHU: Probably. He's probably right. I can tell you one thing, Iran is closer to developing nuclear weapons today than it was a week ago, or a month ago or a year ago. It's just moving on with its efforts. And I think there is a great danger to the world, not only to my country but to the United States, to the Middle East, to peace, to all of humanity, from the prospect that such a regime that brutalizes its own people, that sponsors terrorism more than any other regime in the world -- that this regime acquires atomic bombs is very, very dangerous.
WALLACE: U.S. officials estimate that Iran perhaps within two years will have a nuclear warhead it can put on a ballistic missile that can strike Israel, Europe, much of the world. Do you have a deadline in your own mind for how long you're willing to let diplomacy play out?
NETANYAHU: There's only been one time that Iran actually stopped the program, and that was when it feared U.S. military action. So the -- when the president says that he's determined to prevent Iran from developing nuclear weapons and that all options are on the table, I think that's the right statement of policy.
You ask what is our policy. Our policy is very simple. The Jewish state was set up to defend Jewish lives, and we always reserve the right to defend ourselves.
WALLACE: Do you have a deadline in your mind for how long you're willing to let diplomacy play out?
NETANYAHU: Well, I think that we always reserve the right to defend ourselves.
WALLACE: Do you believe a nuclear Iran -- a nuclear Iran -- can be contained?
NETANYAHU: No. No, I don't. I think that's a mistake, and I think people fall into a misconception.
WALLACE: So it must be -- so it must be stopped?
NETANYAHU: You can't rely on the fact that they'll obey the calculations of cost and benefit that have governed all nuclear power since the rise of the nuclear age. After Hiroshima and Nagasaki, we've had effective nuclear peace for more than half a century because everybody understood the rules.
I don't think you can rely on Iran. I don't think you can rely on other radicals like the Taliban. They dispatched Al Qaida to bomb New York and Washington. What were they thinking? Were they that stupid? They weren't stupid. There is an irrationality there, and there is madness in this method.
And we should not allow irrational regimes like Iran to have nuclear weapons. It's the ultimate terrorist threat today.
WALLACE: But I want to follow your argument. You say that Panetta is probably right that sanctions won't work. You say flatly that containing a nuclear Iran is impossible. Have you and the president ever discussed the possibility of a military strike?
NETANYAHU: I'm not going to get into the confidential discussions, and I'm not confirming anything of the sort. But I am saying that the president's position that all options are on the table might actually have the only real effect on Iran if they -- if they think it's true.
WALLACE: This week, you relaxed restrictions on the goods that you're allowing to go into Gaza. But do you believe that Israel did anything wrong while it was intercepting that ship on May 31st and nine people were killed? Do you believe that there was an excessive use of force?
NETANYAHU: Oh, first of all, I think we regret the loss of lives. But I talked to the soldiers. I visited the wounded soldiers. I visited them in the hospital. One of them was shot. These activists, these Turkish radicals, clubbed them, knifed them, took one of their weapons, fired at them. They were shot.
And unfortunately, people were killed, but they acted in self-defense. Your Coast Guard would do the same. Would you feel that they did a terrible thing if they defended their lives?
WALLACE: So no excessive force?
NETANYAHU: Certainly, force that was used to defend their lives. They acted in self-defense, as I heard it directly from them.
But I think we have a credible investigation. In Israel's case, it's a real investigation, a real impartial, professional investigation, and it will come out. All the facts will come out.
WALLACE: And will you enforce the blockade against any other ships that try to test it?
NETANYAHU: We are enforcing a security blockade in order to prevent weapons and war material from getting into Gaza. I've lifted all the civilian -- any civilian goods can enter. I've lifted the civilian blockade.
NETANYAHU: So anything can come in -- food, medicine, toys. You name it, it's all -- it can all go freely into Gaza. My policy is simple. Weapons out, everything else in.
WALLACE: Finally, you have been dealing with American presidents for the better part of 30 years, almost. How do you compare Barack Obama to the others?
NETANYAHU: I don't compare people. This is something you leave for biographies. But I can tell you there is a consistent line. And all U.S. presidents, from everyone that I met including President Obama, share what the president called the basic bedrock of this unbreakable bond between Israel and the United States.
Israeli prime ministers are also different. Each one of us is different. But we all value the relationship with the United States enormously. Enormously. I think America has no better friend and ally than Israel in the world, and I'm sure that Israel has no better friend and ally than the United States.
WALLACE: Can you honestly say that Barack Obama supports Israel and understands the threats you face the same way that Reagan, and Clinton and the two Bushes did?
NETANYAHU: I can tell you that we had a conversation in this meeting in Washington the other day, and a good chunk of it -- I'd say about half of it -- was devoted to a detailed discussion of Israel's security problems, the problem that when we vacate territory, Iran and its proxy terrorists walk in with rockets.
And I explained it in great detail, and I found the president was understanding. I found him -- he considered this problem. He understands that we need to have a solution for it. And I intend to work with him and, I hope, with President Abbas to find a solution so that we can couple security with peace, because that's the only peace that will endure, a peace based on security.
I'm prepared to go down this route. I know the president is willing to assist us in this. But I need a partner on the other side. You know, you can't be a trapeze artist that wants to connect with the other guy and there's no one there. I need a Palestinian partner. And President Abbas - - I don't know if you can go from trapeze artist to step up to the plate. He's got to step up to the plate.
WALLACE: Prime Minister Netanyahu, thank you so much for talking with us.
NETANYAHU: Thank you, Chris. My pleasure.
WALLACE: Always a pleasure, sir.
NETANYAHU: Thank you.
On the Show
As the race for the White House heats up, candidates on both sides of the political aisle are crisscrossing the country in the hopes of gaining momentum for a potential presidential bid. One of these possible contenders vying for support is former Hewlett Packard CEO Carly Fiorina, who is making a name for herself as one of Democratic front-runner Hillary Clinton’s biggest critics. We’ll ask Carly Fiorina how she plans to stand-out in a crowded GOP field— exclusively this Fox News Sunday.