Ohio

Federal appeals court weighs Ohio law shielding lethal drugs source

FILE - These undated file combination photo provided by the Ohio Department of Rehabilitation and Corrections shows death row inmates Ronald Phillips and Raymond Tibbetts.

FILE - These undated file combination photo provided by the Ohio Department of Rehabilitation and Corrections shows death row inmates Ronald Phillips and Raymond Tibbetts.  (AP)

A federal appeals court is weighing a challenge by death row inmates of an Ohio law that shields the names of companies that provide lethal injection drugs.

The pending decision by the 6th Circuit Court of Appeals will help determine whether Ohio will proceed with its first executions in three years beginning in February.

Ohio plans to execute Ronald Phillips on Feb. 15 for raping and killing his girlfriend's 3-year-old daughter in 1993. Another execution is scheduled for April.

At issue is a 2015 law approved by lawmakers in hopes of jumpstarting executions in Ohio, which have been on hold since January 2014. That's when it took condemned inmate Dennis McGuire 26 minutes to die from a never-before-used two-drug method while he repeatedly gasped and snorted.

More on this...

The secrecy law blocks anyone from getting information about individuals or entities participating in executions, including companies that make or mix drugs.

Federal Magistrate Judge Michael Merz in Dayton cited the 6th Circuit case earlier this month when he put executions on hold. He said the hold could be lifted after the court rules.

Attorneys for death row inmates argue they can't meaningfully challenge the use of the drugs without the information. They also said the secrecy protections are unnecessary given the history of lawsuits over lethal injection in Ohio.

"Ohio's own history of 53 lethal injection executions over a period of 16 years never required the adoption of a privilege to shield absolutely those who participate in its administration — not even for the executioner himself and the actual members of the execution team," Allen Bohnert, a federal public defender, said in a May court filing.

The state cites defense attorneys' "wildly exaggerated and misplaced arguments" to say that the secrecy provisions should be upheld.

"In response to the increasing unavailability of execution drugs, due to the hesitation of potential suppliers to sell the drugs for fear of threats or harassment, the legislatures of Ohio and other states have enacted laws rendering 'drugs source' information confidential," Charles Wille, an assistant Ohio attorney general, said in a July court filing.

The state's interest in keeping that information confidential far outweighs death row inmates' right to the release of that information, Wille said.

Death penalty defense attorneys say there's no evidence that suppliers would be harassed.

The Department of Rehabilitation and Correction in October announced plans to use a new three-drug combination — midazolam, rocuronium bromide and potassium chloride — for at least three executions.

Phillips and other inmates want to block the new procedure, arguing that it will result in a painful and barbaric death.

Gov. John Kasich has rejected Phillips' request for clemency.