Steve Hayes Breaks Down The House Surveillance Hearings

Women in Combat?

Military plans would put women in most combat jobs including SEALS, Army Rangers

 

Published June 18, 2013

| Associated Press

 

WASHINGTON –  Military leaders are ready to begin tearing down the remaining walls that have prevented women from holding thousands of combat and special operations jobs near the front lines.

 

Under details of the plans obtained by The Associated Press, women could start training as Army Rangers by mid-2015 and as Navy SEALs a year later.

 

The military services have mapped out a schedule that also will include reviewing and possibly changing the physical and mental standards that men and women will have to meet in order to quality for certain infantry, armor, commando and other front-line positions across the Army, Navy, Air Force and Marines. Under the plans to be introduced Tuesday, there would be one common standard for men and women for each job.

 

Defense Secretary Chuck Hagel reviewed the plans and has ordered the services to move ahead.

 

The move follows revelations of a startling number of sexual assaults in the armed forces. Earlier this year, Joint Chiefs of Staff Chairman Gen. Martin Dempsey said the sexual assaults might be linked to the longstanding ban on women serving in combat because the disparity between the roles of men and women creates separate classes of personnel -- male "warriors" versus the rest of the force.

 

While the sexual assault problem is more complicated than that, he said, the disparity has created a psychology that lends itself to disrespect for women.

Under the schedules military leaders delivered to Hagel, the Army will develop standards by July 2015 to allow women to train and potentially serve as Rangers, and qualified women could begin training as Navy SEALs by March 2016 if senior leaders agree. Military leaders have suggested bringing senior women from the officer and enlisted ranks into special forces units first to ensure that younger, lower-ranking women have a support system to help them get through the transition.

 

The Navy intends to open up its Riverine force and begin training women next month, with the goal of assigning women to the units by October. While not part of the special operations forces, the coastal Riverine squadrons do close combat and security operations in small boats. The Navy plans to have studies finished by July 2014 on allowing women to serve as SEALs, and has set October 2015 as the date when women could begin Navy boot camp with the expressed intention of becoming SEALs eventually.

U.S. Special Operations Command is coordinating the matter of what commando jobs could be opened to women, what exceptions might be requested and when the transition would take place.

 

The proposals leave the door open for continued exclusion of women from some jobs if research and testing find that women could not be successful in sufficient numbers. But the services would have to defend such decisions to top Pentagon leaders.

 

Army officials plan to complete gender-neutral standards for the Ranger course by July 2015. Army Rangers are one of the service's special operations units, but many soldiers who go through Ranger training and wear the coveted tab on their shoulders never actually serve in the 75th Ranger Regiment. To be considered a true Ranger, soldiers must serve in the regiment.

 

In January, then-Defense Secretary Leon Panetta and Dempsey signed an order that wiped away generations of limits on where and how women could fight for their country. At the time, they asked the services to develop plans to set the change in motion.

 

The decision reflects a reality driven home by the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan, where battle lines were blurred and women were propelled into jobs as medics, military police and intelligence officers who were sometimes attached, but not formally assigned, to battalions. So even though a woman could not serve officially as a battalion infantryman going out on patrol, she could fly a helicopter supporting the unit or be part of a team supplying medical aid if troops were injured.

 

Of the more than 6,700 U.S. service members who have been killed in Iraq and Afghanistan, about 150 have been women.

 

The order Panetta and Dempsey signed prohibits physical standards from being lowered simply to allow women to qualify for jobs closer to the battlefront. But the services are methodically reviewing and revising the standards for many jobs, including strength and stamina, in order to set minimum requirements for troops to meet regardless of their sex.

 

The military services are also working to determine the cost of opening certain jobs to women, particularly aboard a variety of Navy ships, including certain submarines, frigates, mine warfare and other smaller warships. Dozens of ships do not have adequate berthing or facilities for women to meet privacy needs, and would require design and construction changes.

 

Under a 1994 Pentagon policy, women were prohibited from being assigned to ground combat units below the brigade level. A brigade is roughly 3,500 troops split into several battalions of about 800 soldiers each. Historically, brigades were based farther from the front lines, and they often included top command and support staff.

 

Last year the military opened up about 14,500 combat positions to women, most of them in the Army, by allowing them to serve in many jobs at the battalion level. The January order lifted the last barrier to women serving in combat, but allows the services to argue to keep some jobs closed.

 

The bulk of the nearly 240,000 jobs currently closed to women are in the Army, including those in infantry, armor, combat engineer and artillery units that are often close to the battlefront. Similar jobs in the Marine Corps are also closed.

 

Army officials have laid out a rolling schedule of dates in 2015 to develop gender-neutral standards for specific jobs, beginning with July for engineers, followed by field artillery in March and the infantry and armor jobs no later than September.

 

Women make up about 14 percent of the 1.4 million active U.S. military personnel. More than 280,000 women have been sent to Iraq, Afghanistan or neighboring nations in support of the wars.



Read more: /us/2013/06/18/military-plans-would-put-women-in-most-combat-jobs-including-seals-army-rangers/print#ixzz2Wb5DHYvQ

Race For Every Child: Children's National Medical Center

(Paul and Bret with Dr. Bear at an event for Children's)

The Special Report team will be participating in the Race For Every Child 5k benefitting Children's National Medical Center this October. The hospital serves the Washington, DC area as well as the United States and the world. They see more than 270,000 patients annually and they provide more than $50 million dollars in uncompensated care each year. 

The hospital is very important to the Baier family. Their son, Paul, received life saving care due to a congenital heart defect and is doing well today thanks to the doctors and nurses at Children's National. Paul continues his care at Children's and you can read more about his condition here.

If you live in the DC area we encourage you to start a team! You can check out our fundraising page here. We are currently the #2 team-- and if you know us we are pretty competitive--so we are going to continue our efforts to raise money for the hospital because we all believe in this cause!

Thank you,

Special Report w/Bret Baier

Celebrities Taking A Stand On Health Issues

These days more celebrities are speaking out and sharing their own personal health battles—even if the problem is considered taboo. Magic Johnson shocked the nation in 1991 when he announced his retirement from the Los Angeles Lakers due to an HIV positive status.  In the 1980’s HIV/AIDS was associated with a high level of stigma and discrimination—linked mostly to gay men and IV drug users. Johnson emerged as a symbol of hope for millions of Americans battling HIV/AIDS and later started a foundation to fund HIV education and prevention programs.

Beautiful and brave--Angelina Jolie announced last month that she underwent a double mastectomy – a decision she made after learning she carried a genetic mutation of the BRCA-1 gene, increasing her odds of developing breast cancer by 87% and ovarian cancer by 50%. The actress and mom of six lost her own mother to ovarian cancer in 2007 and noted that the surgery did not make her feel like any less of a woman. The decision is a controversial one, but no doubt courageous and Jolie has brought much needed attention to women’s health and preventative medicine.  Her odds of developing breast cancer post surgery –less than 5 %. Good luck to her and her family—

Actor Michael Douglas was diagnosed with stage-four throat cancer in 2010 and has been cancer free for more than two years. The cause of Douglas’ cancer is still unknown. Original reports indicated it was years of heavy drinking and smoking that lead to the disease, but in a recent interview with The Guardian Douglas seemed to suggest his cancer was caused by HPV—the most common sexually transmitted disease in the United States. His publicist later stated, quote “that oral sex is a suspected cause of certain oral cancers …but he (Douglas) did not say it was the specific cause of his personal cancer.” Regardless of what caused Douglas’ cancer his comments have brought this important subject out in the open. The CDC estimates that in the U.S. HPV causes 12,000 cases of cervical cancer, 1,700 cases of oral cancers in women and 6,700 cases of oral cancers in men. There is currently a vaccine available to help protect against HPV infection –something that Douglas has spoken out about and encouraged.

So what do you think about these celebrities putting their own medical battles out in the open—regardless of what others might say? Brave or simply too much information? Share your thoughts with me via Twitter @KatyRicalde and I’ll see you next week on The Daily Bret!

 

When should emergency contraception be available?

 

The Obama administration announced Monday plans to comply with a judges order to allow emergency contraception to be available over-the-counter without a prescription to girls of any age.

 

Vote in our poll and share your thoughts-- and check out this foxnews.com article.

Behind the Scenes Photos: Bret at the NCTA Cable Show

Entertainment. Technology. Television. Internet. Iconic Brands. Start Ups. And much more.

The Cable Show is your entry point to the digital media, entertainment and Internet ecosystem - a world of invention, commerce and progress revolving around the most powerful communications platform. It's where leaders from every sector - from content to devices to applications to education - come together to spark ideas and create partnerships that keep cable ahead in today's digital media revolution.

A few photos of Bret at a meet and greet at the Fox News booth:

Special Edition of Special Report Online: Monday, June 10th

Please join us tonight at 7pmET for a special edition of Special Report Online! This is your chance to interact with Bret and the panel! We will not have SR Online this Wednesday, so please join us tonight-

foxnews.com/sronline

News Crew Attacked

Melissa Lawrence, mother of a shooting victim, is facing charges in Rhode Island for felony assault with a deadly weapon. Lawrence attacked a local reporter and her photographer (who were there to see if Lawrence would comment on the arrest of the shooter) with rocks, threatened them with a baseball bat and then proceeded to sic her pitbull's on the news team. The reporter, Abbey Niezgoda, was bitten by one of the dogs and later received a tetanus shot. The photographer was hit with a rock--

We want to know...what do you think? The grieving mother vs. the journalist. The woman does tell the reporter to leave, but it appears from the video (see above) that she throws rocks before they get the chance to.  Did she have the right to do that? Did the reporter cross the line? Should Lawrence be charged?

We should also note that when Animal Control went back to collect the dogs they were no longer in the home--more charges could follow. Lawrence's daughter is at home recovering and she has entered a not guilty plea.

 

 

Did you know?

Today marks the 69th anniversary of the 1944 D-Day landings in Normandy during World War II. A day of ceremonies to commemorate the anniversary is planned for Thursday across Normandy to honor the 150,000 troops who risked or gave their lives that day--

We remember them and thank them for their service--

 

 

D-Day's greatest lesson

http://www.foxnews.com/opinion/2013/06/06/d-day-greatest-lesson/

By Walter R. Borneman

Sixty-nine years ago today the combined forces of the United States and it allies waded ashore on the beaches of Normandy. Aside from the Japanese attack on Pearl Harbor, June 6, 1944 has become the defining memory marker of a generation that is rapidly disappearing.

Everyone of age to understand when they heard Franklin Roosevelt’s voice crackle out of their radios to announce the Allied invasion of France knew that three years of united effort were paving the way to inevitable victory.

On that day, the situation was tenuous for a time, but individual acts of heroism—parachuting into St. Lo, scaling the cliffs at Pointe du Hoc, or charging machine gun nests on Omaha Beach—ultimately determined the outcome. Beyond those acts of personal courage, D-Day showed the enormous outpouring of America’s industrial might that in three short years provided the ships, planes, and vehicles to undertake the greatest amphibious assault in history.

Those veterans of D-Day who remain are in their late eighties and nineties. They have many memories of long and fulfilling lives, but in the twilight of their years so many of their sharpest memories seem to be of that time long ago when as fresh-faced teenagers they gave their all to a common purpose. Much has been written about their leaders, but it was their individual efforts that made this difference.

The memories of those who fell sixty-nine years ago at Normandy are sacred, but no less so than the contributions of those who served on every front. Sixteen million American men and women served in the armed forces during World War II.

Today, only an estimated 1.2 million are still living and they are dying at a rate approaching 1,000 per day. Some of their memories have been preserved, but the tangible link of their presence is rapidly disappearing.

Perhaps the greatest lesson of D-Day is that nothing is impossible for the American people.

The most amazing transformation in American history may be the 1,366 days between December 7, 1941, and September 2, 1945—and the speed with which the Axis powers were reduced to ruin once the United States entered the Second World War.

During this time, the tremendous outpouring of America’s industrial strength in ships, planes, tanks, and other armaments was exceeded only by the bravery and determination of the nation’s men and women.

They were a “can-do” generation who did not take “no” for an answer. They did not put off until tomorrow what needed to be done today.

We should remember their resolve, honor their commitment, and seek to emulate their example from the factories of America’s heartland to the beaches of Normandy.

Walter R. Borneman is the author of The Admirals: Nimitz, Halsey, Leahy, and King—The Five-Star Admirals Who Won the War at Sea, just released in paperback from Little, Brown.

Resignations and Appointments

National Security Adviser Tom Donilon announced his resignation today-- Donilon has been with the administration since day 1, serving first as Deputy National Security Adviser. Senior officials tell Fox News that Donilon's wife recently took a new job that involves a lot of foreign travel and he has decided to make a change and spend more time with his family. 

President Obama announced shortly after that UN Ambassador Susan Rice will replace Donilon-- a note that the post does not require Senate confirmation.  Rice had been considered for Secretary of State following Hillary Clinton's departure, but withdrew from consideration amid fallout following the Benghazi attacks. 

Samantha Power, former aide to President Obama, will succeed Amb. Rice . Power was an aide on President Obama's '08 campaign, but stepped down following comments she made calling then Senator Hillary Clinton a "monster."

 

What do you think about the appointments of Susan Rice and Samantha Power? Share your thoughts with us here on The Daily Bret or via Twitter @BretBaier.

Advertisement

Browse

On The Show

NSA Director Keith Alexander testifies in a rare, open hearing about the secret government surveillance programs and the terror plots that were averted. Tune in to see what our panel has to say about the hearing.

All-Star Panel

  • Stephen Hayes @stephenfhayes
  • AB Stoddard @thehill
  • Charles Krauthammer @krauthammer

Premium Podcasts

Missed the All-Star Panel on Special Report with Bret Baier? You can now get a daily audio podcast of Fox News Channel's Special Report All-Star Panel.

Pay-Per-Podcast
Monthly Subscription
Yearly Subscription