HEALTH

Secretly Infected with Syphilis, Guatemalan Victims May Sue U.S.

  • GLASGOW, UNITED KINGDOM - SEPTEMBER 11: A young boy receives an immunization jab at a health centre on September 11, 2007 in Glasgow, Scotland. Medical experts still believe the MMR jab is safe and that the vaccine does not cause autism. (Photo by Jeff J Mitchell/Getty Images)

    GLASGOW, UNITED KINGDOM - SEPTEMBER 11: A young boy receives an immunization jab at a health centre on September 11, 2007 in Glasgow, Scotland. Medical experts still believe the MMR jab is safe and that the vaccine does not cause autism. (Photo by Jeff J Mitchell/Getty Images)  (2007 Getty Images)

  • GLASGOW, UNITED KINGDOM - SEPTEMBER 11: A young boy receives an immunization jab at a health centre on September 11, 2007 in Glasgow, Scotland. Medical experts still believe the MMR jab is safe and that the vaccine does not cause autism. (Photo by Jeff J Mitchell/Getty Images)

    GLASGOW, UNITED KINGDOM - SEPTEMBER 11: A young boy receives an immunization jab at a health centre on September 11, 2007 in Glasgow, Scotland. Medical experts still believe the MMR jab is safe and that the vaccine does not cause autism. (Photo by Jeff J Mitchell/Getty Images)  (2007 Getty Images)

Four decades after 700 Guatemalan prisoners, mental patients, soldiers and orphans were intentionally infected with syphilis by U.S. researchers, lawyers representing the Central Americans announced they plan to sue federal health officials.

The lawyers said they are hoping for an out-of-court settlement and are giving the Obama administration until Friday to respond to a settlement offer. But if the administration fails to respond by that day, the lawyers will file a class-action lawsuit by the victims or their survivors, they told Attorney General Eric Holder in a letter.

"We have decided to create one opportunity to see if we can settle the issues presented in this tragic situation without involving the judicial process," said the letter from attorneys Andres Alonso and Terrence Collingsworth.

The legal move comes after revelations last year that U.S. scientists studying the effects of penicillin in the 1940s deliberately infected about 700 Guatemalans — some as young as 6, according to the lawyers. None were informed or gave consent.

The American team convinced officials at orphanages and prisons to cooperate by giving them other supplies such as refrigerators and difficult-to-get medications for malaria and epilepsy. Sometimes, individual subjects were paid with cigarettes and, in the case of prisoners, infected prostitutes were used to expose them to the disease, according to court documents.

More On This...

A Justice Department spokesman declined to comment. Last October, Secretary of State Hillary Rodham Clinton and Health and Human Services Secretary Kathleen Sebelius called the experiments "reprehensible" and issued a public apology. Obama also apologized to Guatemalan President Alvaro Colom in a phone call and created a special bioethics panel to look into international medical studies, the White House said.

The administration's apologetic tone led the Guatemalans' attorneys to seek the unusual out-of-court settlement before a lawsuit is filed. They want the U.S. to waive any sovereign immunity defenses to block the Guatemalan claims or, as an alternative, they want a claims process similar to those set up in the Gulf of Mexico oil spill and the 9/11 terror attacks.

"This is to encourage the administration to take the next step," said Piper Hendricks, an attorney with Fort Lauderdale-based Conrad & Scherer LLP who is working on the case.

The Guatemalan experiments ran from 1946 to 1948 and were funded by the National Institutes of Health. Their existence was hidden for decades, until Wellesley College medical historian Susan Reverby uncovered the records in 2009.

The U.S. has been involved in numerous other infamous medical studies on human subjects. The most notorious was the Tuskegee syphilis research on 600 black men in Alabama who were studied without being offered any treatment. The physician involved in that study, Dr. John Cutler, was also involved in the Guatemalan research.

The attorneys said Guatemala was chosen because it would be easier to escape ethical scrutiny there.

"This decision to move to Guatemala was part of a deliberate plan to continue the Tuskegee testing offshore, where it would not be subject to the same level of oversight as in the United States," their draft lawsuit says.

It's unclear how many potential plaintiffs could be part of the class, which would include not only those directly involved in the research but also their relatives and survivors. The lawsuit, if filed, seeks an unspecified amount of damages for violations of people's rights including "cruel, inhuman and degrading treatment" and medical experimentation on humans without consent.

Based on reporting by The Associated Press.

Follow us on twitter.com/foxnewslatino
Like us at facebook.com/foxnewslatino