Updated October 27, 2009
Obama Cannot Accept Nobel Prize Without Congress' Consent, Three House Republicans Claim
FOXNews.com
In a letter penned to President Obama on Monday, Florida Rep. Ginny Brown-Waite claims Obama is obligated under the U.S. Constitution to obtain Congress' approval before he formally accepts the prize.
As critics continue to mull over whether President Obama deserved the Nobel Peace Prize, Rep. Ginny Brown-Waite says the U.S. Constitution does not allow him to accept the award without the consent of Congress.
In a letter to Obama delivered on Monday, Brown-Waite, R-Fla., along with Rep. Cliff Stearns, R-Fla., and Rep. Ron Paul, R-Texas, claim the president is obligated under the Constitution to obtain Congress' approval before he formally accepts the prize.
Article I, Section 9, of the Constitution, the emolument clause, states: "And no person holding any office of profit or trust under them, shall, without the consent of the Congress, accept of any present, emolument, office or title, of any kind whatever, from any king, prince or foreign state."
The five-member Nobel commission, which awarded Obama the prize earlier this month, is elected by the Norwegian Parliament -- the Storting. The award is therefore made by a group representing a foreign state, the writers argued.
"As the Nobel Peace Prize is awarded by a committee appointed by the Parliament of Norway, the Storting, the prize is clearly subject to the requirements set forth in Article 1, Section 9 of the Constitution. Obtaining permission from Congress should be straightforward," Brown-Waite wrote in the letter.
"I urge President Obama to affirm his devotion to our Constitution and seek the consent of Congress before accepting the award in Oslo, Norway, on December 10," she said.
Latest Politics Videos
-
-
Eventful Trip?
-
Nov 21, 2009
Did Obama make any news in Asia?
-
-
-
Bogus Numbers
-
Nov 21, 2009
Media cracks down on 'saved jobs' numbers
-
-
-
Behind the Breaks # 1
-
Nov 21, 2009
Fair and balanced fact checking?
-
-
-
Behind the Breaks # 2
-
Nov 21, 2009
Obama's bow: Much ado about nothing?
-
-
-
The Journal Editorial Report: 11/21
-
Nov 21, 2009
What role will Palin play in 2010?
-
-
-
Behind the Breaks # 3
-
Nov 21, 2009
What will make news in coming weeks?
-
Real Clear Politics Poll
| Job Approval | Approve | Disapprove | Spread |
| Obama | 50.6% | 43.4% | +7.2% |
| Congress | 27.0% | 64.3% | -37.3% |
| Direction of Country | Right Direction | Wrong Track | Spread |
| RCP Average | 38.0% | 57.2% | -19.2% |
Most Active In Politics
Most Read
Most Commented
-
House Passes Health Care Bill
November 08, 2009 1,132 comments
-
AP Turns Heads for Devoting 11 Reporters to Palin Book 'Fact Check'
November 18, 2009 855 comments
-
Obama: 'Dont' Jump to Conclusions' on Fort Hood Shooting
November 06, 2009 615 comments
-
Health Care Bill Moves Forward
November 21, 2009 734 comments
-
U.S. Likely to Seek Death Penalty for Sept. 11 Terror Suspects
November 13, 2009 728 comments
-
Strains in Party Threatens Democrats
November 20, 2009
-
U.S. Enlists Allies in New Surge
November 21, 2009
-
Obama Seeks to Boost U.S. Exports
November 21, 2009
-
California's Newsom Faces Headwinds
November 20, 2009
-
White House Seeks Broad Climate Plan
November 20, 2009
-
Peter Mandelson bets on two sure-fire losers
November 21, 2009
-
Sadly, most people with a learning disability should not have children
November 21, 2009
-
Wind of deceit drives Labour’s green energy plan
November 21, 2009
-
A game of two halves: cheating and whining
November 21, 2009
-
Belle lays bare the myth that every hooker is a victim
November 21, 2009



recommend

Subscribe to Comments






