Updated November 10, 2009
We Can't Sit Back and Allow the Loss of Our Freedoms
, FOXNews.com
We elect the government. It works for us. As we watch the Democrats' plans for health care take shape, we can only ask how did our government get so removed, so unbridled, so arrogant that it can tell us how to live our personal lives?
Last Saturday, at 11 o’clock in the evening, the House of Representatives voted by a five vote margin to have the federal government manage the health care of every American at a cost of $1 trillion dollars over the next ten years.
For the first time in American history, if this bill becomes law, the Feds will force you to buy insurance you might not want, or may not need, or cannot afford. If you don’t purchase what the government tells you to buy, if you don’t do so when they tell you to do it, and if you don’t buy just what they say is right for you, the government may fine you, prosecute you, and even put you in jail. Freedom of choice and control over your own body will be lost. The privacy of your communications and medical decision making with your physician will be gone. More of your hard earned dollars will be at the disposal of federal bureaucrats.
It was not supposed to be this way. We elect the government. It works for us. How did it get so removed, so unbridled, so arrogant that it can tell us how to live our personal lives? Evil rarely comes upon us all at once, and liberty is rarely lost in one stroke. It happens gradually, over the years and decades and even centuries. A little stretch here, a cave in there, powers are slowly taken from the states and the people and before you know it, we have one big monster government that recognizes no restraint on its ability to tell us how to live. It claims the power to regulate any activity, tax any behavior, and demand conformity to any standard it chooses.
The Founders did not give us a government like the one we have today. The government they gave us was strictly limited in its scope, guaranteed individual liberty, preserved the free market, and on matters that pertain to our private behavior was supposed to leave us alone.
In the Constitution, the Founders built in checks and balances. If the Congress got out of hand, the states would restrain it. If the states stole liberty or property, the Congress would cure it. If the President tried to become a king, the courts would prevent it.
In the next few weeks, I will be giving a public class on Constitutional Law here on the Fox News Channel, on the Fox Business Network, on Foxnews.com, and on Fox Nation. In anticipation of that, many of you have asked: What can we do now about the loss of freedom? For starters, we can vote the bums out of their cushy federal offices! We can persuade our state governments to defy the Feds in areas like health care -- where the Constitution gives the Feds zero authority. We can petition our state legislatures to threaten to amend the Constitution to abolish the income tax, return the selection of U.S. senators to state legislatures and nullify all the laws the Congress has written that are not based in the Constitution.
One thing we can’t do is just sit back and take it.
Judge Andrew Napolitano is Fox News' senior judicial analyst.
Fox Nation
-
Rev. Wright Re-emerges: 'Don't Call Me the Controversial Rev. Wright ...'
November 21, 2009 47 comments
-
McCain Risks Losing Senate Seat
November 20, 2009 364 comments
-
Candidate Enters Race for Fake NH-00 Congressional District
November 20, 2009 34 comments
-
Pelosi: Bin Laden Could Be Read Miranda Rights
November 20, 2009 240 comments
-
Hoffman Considering Recount Claim
November 20, 2009 27 comments
-
9/11 Trial Could Cost Taxpayers Over $100M
November 20, 2009 121 comments
-
Gore Plugs Florescent Lightbulbs On NBC's "30 Rock"
November 20, 2009 66 comments
-
Colbert, Letterman Amazed How "Cool" Obama Is
November 20, 2009 103 comments
-
Waxman on Health Care Bill: 'We Can Build on It Later'
November 20, 2009 82 comments
-
Ben Nelson Threatens Filibuster
November 20, 2009 44 comments
Most Commented
-
Why is the White House Still Attacking Fox News?
October 19, 2009 2,224 comments
-
Did 'Curb' and HBO Cross the Line?
October 28, 2009 1,430 comments
-
Should Justice Investigate ACORN?
September 10, 2009 1,396 comments
-
Do You Agree With Decision to Release Lockerbie Bomber?
August 20, 2009 1,275 comments
-
Did Carter Cross the Line?
September 16, 2009 1,208 comments
-
Interview with Meb Keflezighi: Running Man
November 20, 2009
-
Matthew Kaminski: Selling Meg Whitman in California
November 20, 2009
-
The End of HSAs
November 20, 2009
-
Why We're Not 'Post-Racial'
November 20, 2009
-
Obama Union Rules
November 20, 2009
-
Landrieu's Vote Came with a Price
November 22, 2009
-
The Kennedy Brothers: Rest in Peace
November 22, 2009
-
Catholic Bishops Look to Get Their House in Order
November 22, 2009
-
Obama's Approval Rating Falls in Iowa Where He Got His First Big Boost
November 21, 2009
-
Senate Votes to Bring Health Care Reform Bill to Floor
November 21, 2009
-
Peter Mandelson bets on two sure-fire losers
November 21, 2009
-
Sadly, most people with a learning disability should not have children
November 21, 2009
-
Wind of deceit drives Labour’s green energy plan
November 21, 2009
-
A game of two halves: cheating and whining
November 21, 2009
-
Belle lays bare the myth that every hooker is a victim
November 21, 2009
-
Religion and Capitalism
November 21, 2009
-
New York Times Gets One Right
November 20, 2009 6 comments
-
The True Cost of the Health Care Bills
November 20, 2009 4 comments
-
Legal Theft
November 20, 2009 4 comments
-
Rewarding Incompetence
November 19, 2009 25 comments



recommend

Subscribe to Comments
