Updated October 14, 2009
Targeting Fox News Is a Profound Political Mistake
, FOXNews.com
To believe that you can reach Democrats and some of the nation's independents through the rest of the mainstream media and write off an audience of between two and four million people is just plain illogical.
The White House is making a profound political mistake by targeting Fox News and deliberately deciding to exclude them from interviews and access to the administration. And not only that, they are making a mistake on both a practical and a political level.
Frankly, it just doesn’t make sense.
On a practical level, targeting a news organization only redounds to one’s detriment. I have no doubt that Fox News will not change its coverage, nor should it, in response to statements from White House Communications Director Anita Dunn. Nonetheless, indicating that five separate Fox News programs will not have access to White House personnel simply raises a red flag.
Richard Nixon tried to do this in the 1970’s with The New York Times, and it backfired. I have no doubt that with regards to how to practice communications and how to access the diversity of different media in America, this is not a salutary development for the Obama administration.
Moreover, it represents a profound political misjudgment. It is a misjudgment to believe that because a network has opinion programs that present a different view from the administration that the network itself and its viewers are unabashedly hostile.
Fox News’ news programs are straightforward. Most importantly, Fox News’ audience involves a substantial number of independents and moderate Republicans who should have access to, and might be persuaded by, some of the administration’s arguments. To simply believe that you can target Democrats and some of the independents through the rest of the mainstream media, and write off an audience of between two and four million people, is just plain illogical.
Even boycotting Fox News opinion programs, which consistently take positions that are of variance to the White House or Democratic Party stances, is a mistake. Getting a point of view across, even in a forum that is less hospitable and congenial than preferred, is an unabashed positive. Put another way, it simply is a mistake to cede all of the air time to people who present a different view.
On a personal note, I have been a Fox News contributor for over five years. Throughout this time, I have certainly disagreed with the political positions of many of the people who have interviewed me. But I have always found that I have been given a fair opportunity to get my point across, and to make an argument from a centrist-Democratic point of view that most Americans and many Fox viewers find agreeable.
It would be a bad judgment for America, and for the White House, if the administration sticks to its policy and maintains an effective boycott of Fox News.
Doug Schoen is a Democratic pollster, author and Fox News contributor.
Fox Nation
-
"SNL" Destroy Obama Over Spending
November 22, 2009 17 comments
-
NYT Op-ed: Conservatives Cause Ft. Hood
November 22, 2009 19 comments
-
Dowd Rips Obama, Says He Could Learn From Palin
November 22, 2009 37 comments
-
Is Obamacare A Ponzi Scheme?
November 22, 2009 48 comments
-
Bishop Bans Rep. Kennedy From Communion
November 22, 2009 94 comments
-
Glenn Beck Reveals "The Plan"
November 22, 2009 224 comments
-
9/11 Suspects Seek Show Trial
November 22, 2009 127 comments
-
Rev. Wright Re-emerges: 'Don't Call Me the Controversial Rev. Wright ...'
November 21, 2009 56 comments
-
McCain Risks Losing Senate Seat
November 20, 2009 364 comments
-
Candidate Enters Race for Fake NH-00 Congressional District
November 20, 2009 37 comments
Most Commented
-
Why is the White House Still Attacking Fox News?
October 19, 2009 2,226 comments
-
Did 'Curb' and HBO Cross the Line?
October 28, 2009 1,430 comments
-
Should Justice Investigate ACORN?
September 10, 2009 1,397 comments
-
Do You Agree With Decision to Release Lockerbie Bomber?
August 20, 2009 1,275 comments
-
Did Carter Cross the Line?
September 16, 2009 1,208 comments
-
Reuel Marc Gerecht: Major Hasan and Holy War
November 22, 2009
-
No Bondholder Left Behind
November 23, 2009
-
O'Grady: The End of Bolivian Democracy
November 22, 2009
-
The Senate's Health-Care Act
November 22, 2009
-
Cyclones and Global Warming
November 22, 2009
-
Obama and Dems on Health Care: No Need to Rush
November 23, 2009
-
Tom DeLay to Two-Step on 'Dancing With the Stars' Finale
November 23, 2009
-
The How-To Guide for Improving the Health Care Bill
November 23, 2009
-
Pressure From the Right: GOP Candidates Bet On Obama Fatigue
November 23, 2009
-
First Obama State Dinner: Lucky 400 at Tuesday Bash
November 23, 2009
-
Alas, it’s the end of the road for petrolheads
November 22, 2009
-
A gross insult to the people of Europe
November 22, 2009
-
Rule the waves? Not any more we don’t
November 22, 2009
-
They’re still wriggling to avoid the flak on Iraq
November 22, 2009
-
Copenhagen will fail – and quite right too
November 22, 2009
-
Religion and Capitalism
November 21, 2009 10 comments
-
New York Times Gets One Right
November 20, 2009 7 comments
-
The True Cost of the Health Care Bills
November 20, 2009 6 comments
-
Legal Theft
November 20, 2009 6 comments
-
Rewarding Incompetence
November 19, 2009 25 comments



recommend

Subscribe to Comments
