Updated August 07, 2009
Guess What? Unemployment's Really at 16.3 Percent
, FOXNews.com
How is it possible for the unemployment rate to essentially remain unchanged when 247,000 jobs have been lost? Because the number of people who gave up and stopped looking for work rose dramatically.
The announcement today that the unemployment rate declined slightly to 9.4 percent in July while only 247,000 additional jobs were lost has been greeted as good news. The change in the unemployment rate puts the rate at what it was in May. Yet, even a rough look at the numbers indicates that the true unemployment rate has been getting significantly worse over the last few months.
How is it possible for the unemployment rate to essentially remain unchanged when 247,000 jobs have been lost? The reason is simple -- the number of people who stopped looking for work rose dramatically. Six hundred thirty-seven thousand additional people no longer consider themselves looking for work. This is by far the largest drop in the number of people who consider themselves in the labor force during the last year. -- It is almost twice the 358,000 increase in the people who left the labor force during June and almost four times the average monthly increase of 167,333 over the last year. Jobs are sufficiently scarce and the prospects of people finding them at wages that they are willing to work for so low that many individuals don't think that it is worth their time to even look for a job.
Part of the drop in unemployment is also due to the fact that some people are running out of unemployment benefits and taking part-time jobs. There is usually a big increase in the rate that people find jobs during the last few weeks that they have unemployment benefits. In July 102,670 people saw their unemployment benefits run out. That number rose to 141,538 in August and is expected to soar to 486,049 in September. It will keep on rising each month hitting 1.5 million in just December alone. This past Sunday on ABC's "This Week" Treasury Secretary Tim Geithner only promised "to look very carefully at [these lost benefits] as we get closer to the end of this year." Larry Summers, President Obama's chief economic advisor, was similarly noncommittal when he was interviewed that same day on CBS's "Face the Nation."
If we include the normally counted number of unemployed as well as those who have recently given up looking for work and those who have taken a part-time low paying job because they can't find full-time work, the implication is that the unemployment rate for July would be at 16.3 percent These discouraged workers will again look for work once the economy starts to improve, but this 6.9 percentage point gap between publicly discussed unemployment rate and these discouraged workers is unusually large.
The changes in unemployment also mask the large drops that are still occurring in private employment -- construction, manufacturing, retail trade, and professional and business services all suffered large declines. The two of the three areas where employment has increased are government related, either education and health services or general government employment.
These changes do coincide with what is happening with GDP. During the second quarter the private sector kept on shrinking at an annual rate of 3 percent. Overall, GDP declined by "only" 1 percent at an annual rate, but that was because real federal government consumption expenditures and gross investment soared by 11 percent. Real state and local government consumption expenditures and gross investment increased, too, but by a more modest 2.4 percent.
The large and growing number of discouraged workers will make the real unemployment rate hard to bring down in the future.
John Lott is an economist and author of "Freedomnomics."
Fox Nation
-
Couric Recites Health Care Poem on 'Evening News'
November 24, 2009 22 comments
-
Seinfeld in the Year 2009
November 24, 2009 1 comments
-
JLo Falls During Live Performance
November 24, 2009 4 comments
-
Amateur Hour
November 24, 2009 2 comments
-
Dobbs Mulls Running for President
November 24, 2009 6 comments
-
ACORN Caught Dumping Documents in Dumpster
November 24, 2009 13 comments
-
Woman Loses Health Insurance Over Facebook Photo
November 23, 2009 6 comments
-
Union Leader Quits After Scout Backlash
November 23, 2009 1 comments
-
Man Happy With Simple Life in Utah Cave
November 23, 2009
-
U.S. Stalin Memorial Plan Under Fire
November 23, 2009 37 comments
Most Commented
-
Why is the White House Still Attacking Fox News?
October 19, 2009 2,226 comments
-
Did 'Curb' and HBO Cross the Line?
October 28, 2009 1,430 comments
-
Should Justice Investigate ACORN?
September 10, 2009 1,398 comments
-
Do You Agree With Decision to Release Lockerbie Bomber?
August 20, 2009 1,275 comments
-
Did Carter Cross the Line?
September 16, 2009 1,210 comments
-
McGurn: The Other Senate Maverick
November 23, 2009
-
George Melloan: Government Deficits and Private Growth
November 23, 2009
-
Global Warming With the Lid Off
November 24, 2009
-
Obey's Afghan War Surtax
November 24, 2009
-
Liberals and Mammography
November 24, 2009
-
Patricia Murphy on C-SPAN: Health Care, the Economy, Foreign Policy
November 23, 2009
-
South Carolina's Sanford Charged with 37 Counts of Ethics Violations
November 23, 2009
-
Never Misunderestimate Harry Reid
November 23, 2009
-
Gillibrand Still Struggling to Make Her Name Known Across New York
November 23, 2009
-
Video: Palin Book-Signing Crowds Fuzzy On Her Policy Positions
November 23, 2009
-
Would a soldier serving on the Chilcot committee be ruthless enough?
November 23, 2009
-
I do not accept that £64,000 a year for politicians is peanuts
November 23, 2009
-
It’s OK, you’re allowed to laugh at Cast Offs
November 23, 2009
-
Dave’n’George: there may be trouble ahead
November 23, 2009
-
Strip away the figleaf and reveal naysayers
November 23, 2009
-
Irresponsible Krugman, Again
November 23, 2009 5 comments
-
Our Entertainer-Monarchs
November 23, 2009 7 comments
-
Update: Don't Mess with the Scouts
November 23, 2009 3 comments
-
Religion and Capitalism
November 21, 2009 17 comments
-
New York Times Gets One Right
November 20, 2009 7 comments



recommend


Subscribe to Comments
