Updated March 17, 2009
White House Admits Cap-And-Trade Tax Costs Triple Their Official Estimate
- FOXNews.com
Tue, 17 Mar 2009 21:06:52 +0000
The deputy director of the White House National Economic Council, Jason Furman, is giving us a glimpse at the real number, telling Senate staff the energy tax scheme would actually raise "two-to-three times" the budget's official $646 billion revenue estimate.
By Phil Kerpen
I've already explained here on the Forum how the cap-and-trade energy tax works, and would be the biggest tax increase in the history of the country. Now, amazingly, the White House is telling something closer to the truth about this tax hike, admitting that the official budget estimate of $646 billion over 8 years--already a mighty steep price to pay--is far, far lower than the real cost.
The deputy director of the White House National Economic Council, Jason Furman, is giving us a glimpse at the real number, telling Senate staff the energy tax scheme would actually raise "two-to-three times" the budget's official $646 billion revenue estimate. Dow Jones reports that 5 people at the meeting confirmed the statement--we can be pretty sure he said it.
It make sense, because the budget estimate was only half the official score from the Congressional Budget Office for last year's Lieberman-Warner bill, even though the Obama version is designed to have much steeper costs because it requires steeper emissions cuts.
If Furman is right that the real tax hike would be two or three times the official budget estimate--and it's likely still a lowball--that would mean the actual tax hike would run well into the trillions, roughly between $1.3 trillion and $1.9 trillion between fiscal years 2012 and 2019 by Furman's own estimate.
The White House claims that this massive gusher of new tax revenue would be dedicated to tax relief, but judging by the budget that's just a PR gimmick. More than 42 percent of the "tax cuts" in the Obama budget--according to its own official estimates--go to people who don't pay taxes. Call it a handout; call it a welfare check; call it social spending; don't call it a tax cut, though, because it means the burden of the federal government on people who actually work, save, invest, and build wealth will be higher than ever before.
Remember that these staggering costs of $1.3 to $1.9 trillion are for just the first 8 years of a 40 year program that gets much more expensive over time. This would be the final knock-out blow for a wobbly U.S. economy, and we can only hope that as people learn the facts they'll oppose it strongly enough to force Congress and the White House back to the drawing board.
Kerpen is policy director for Americans for Prosperity.
Fox Nation
-
Dems Vote for Slaughter House Rule
March 18, 2010 52 comments
-
Tiger's Texts to Porn Star Released
March 18, 2010 16 comments
-
CBO Admits: We Can't Tell if Stimulus Failed
March 18, 2010 33 comments
-
Michigan Gov.: You Should Give Up Meat for a Day
March 18, 2010 89 comments
-
House Dem Switches Vote From 'Yes' to 'No'
March 18, 2010 29 comments
-
GOP Will Force Vote on Slaughter Rule
March 18, 2010 17 comments
-
GOP Pledges to Repeal Obamacare
March 18, 2010 26 comments
-
Stupak: It's Been a 'Living Hell'
March 18, 2010 28 comments
-
Moore: Republicans Good at Being Bullies and Being Greedy
March 18, 2010 179 comments
-
U.S., India Ink Deal for 'Limitless' Trade
March 18, 2010 3 comments
Most Commented
-
Did Health Care Summit Accomplish Anything?
February 25, 2010 1,454 comments
-
Health Care Summit: How’s It Going?
February 24, 2010 1,270 comments
-
Was Tiger's Apology Good Enough for You?
February 19, 2010 1,269 comments
-
Does the 'Reconciliation' Gambit Make You Angry?
March 03, 2010 1,249 comments
-
Is Democrats' Health Care Reform Legislation Doomed?
March 10, 2010 1,180 comments

-
Fred Barnes: The Health-Care Wars Are Only Beginning
March 17, 2010
-
Henninger: Liz Cheney's Big Question
March 17, 2010
-
The Yuan Scapegoat
March 17, 2010
-
Asbestos Turnabout
March 17, 2010
-
Ruth R. Wisse: How About an Arab 'Settlement' Freeze?
March 17, 2010


-
Susan Greenfield was brilliant. She should step aside
March 17, 2010
-
Blue shirts and blitzkrieg? It’s just not cricket
March 17, 2010
-
Needed: a peaceful anti-Netanyahu uprising
March 17, 2010
-
Stand by, and watch 1992 happen all over again
March 17, 2010

-
Tonight’s Show at 8pm & 11pm EST: Drew Carey Saves Cleveland
March 18, 2010 1 comments
-
Chris Dodd Can't Leave Soon Enough
March 18, 2010
-
Bottled Water Hysteria
March 18, 2010
-
Green Crooks
March 18, 2010 199 comments
-
Politicians Smother Cities
March 17, 2010 14 comments

-
Main Street Fights Wall Street Over Muni Derivatives
March 18, 2010
-
The Accounting Trick That Inflated the Bubble
March 15, 2010 21 comments
-
Greece's Problem? The New York Times
March 09, 2010 4 comments
-
Tired of Bailout Nation?
March 05, 2010 46 comments
-
The Case for Medical Malpractice Reform
March 03, 2010 32 comments

-
Can We Be Friends? (A woman asks a married man.)
March 18, 2010
-
The state of Catholic preaching
March 18, 2010
-
On sex abuse, Benedict now vs. then
March 18, 2010
-
A final word on obesity
March 18, 2010
-
In Texas & Washington, Elections Do Matter
March 18, 2010



recommend

Subscribe to Comments
