Sri Lankan lawmakers are close to giving citizens the right to demand public information — a move many hope will restore transparency and good governance to a nation long plagued by corruption and misrule.

Parliament was expected to approve the Right to Information bill late Friday. Prime Minister Ranil Wickremesinghe said the lack of such legislation has led to large-scale corruption and financial losses to the country through questionable deals.

The bill proposes to give citizens access to public information except personal information, information relating to national security, financial and commercial policy decisions, intellectual property and medical reports. Information also could be withheld if its release is deemed to be in violation of parliamentary privileges.

Sri Lanka has a long history of official secrecy. Information has frequently reached the public only through the leaking of documents to the media, and in recent years the government has cracked down on that as well.

The bill, a longstanding demand from journalists and activists, is part of reforms President Maithripala Sirisena promised before winning the 2015 presidential election. Under his predecessor, Mahinda Rajapaksa, access to government information was greatly limited and journalists were regularly threatened, attacked or even killed.

Media and Information Minister Gayantha Karunatillaka told Parliament that 4,000 state institutions will be covered by the law and 8,000 officials will be trained to provide requested information. The government says it will take about one year to complete logistics and training and for the law to become fully operational.

At least 95 countries, from Iceland to Iran, have some form of freedom of information laws on the books, according to Right2Info, a website launched by the Open Society Justice Initiative. Still, enforcement varies considerably and some of those governments routinely ignore or refuse requests. 

"This is a huge victory for a nation that had nothing of this sort," said K.W. Janaranjana, an activist lawyer and newspaper editor.

He said the law will take time to be successful. "It is not enough bringing in laws; we have to build up an information culture. People are not used to it so we must encourage them to practice this frequently."

Leading lawyer and ethnic Tamil lawmaker M.A. Sumanthiran said the law probably will not be helpful in answering questions from the country's quarter-century-long civil war, even though the bill doesn't explicitly exclude such requests. Tens of thousands of people remain missing from the war, which ended in 2009, and others are denied access to property seized during the fighting.

"What is contemplated through the RTI (bill) is not this kind of information," he said.

Pakiyasothy Saravanamuttu, head of the local think tank Center for Policy Alternatives, says information related to the civil war can be denied citing the exceptions under national security, but people should use every opportunity to test it.

The bill requires an information officer to decide whether to release or withhold requested information within 14 working days and to share the information within the next 14 days. People seeking information who are dissatisfied by those decisions have three levels of appeal.

A five-member Right to Information Commission would be set up to monitor and ensure compliance, and would have powers to hold inquiries and hear appeals.

The bill proposes fines and jail terms for officials who deliberately refuse applications, refuse to release shareable information or destroys or distorts information in his or her custody.

___

Associated Press writer Krishan Francis contributed to this report.