Gingrich blasts Clinton's level of corruption; Giuliani: I'm so ashamed of the Justice Department

This is a rush transcript from "Hannity," November 1, 2016. This copy may not be in its final form and may be updated.

SEAN HANNITY, HOST: Welcome to "Hannity." Tonight, Hillary Clinton -- follow my words -- the media won't say it. She should be in jail, not on the campaign trail. It's about time somebody said it. In just a few minutes, we'll check in with Newt Gingrich and Rudy Giuliani.  We'll explain why.

But first, an explosive new batch of emails released by WikiLeaks raises very questions about whether or not Clinton's campaign deliberately gave the OK to delete thousands of emails just two days before she was served with a congressional subpoena.

Now, on March 2nd -- pay close attention to the timeline -- 2015, the same day the world first found out about Clinton's use of a private email server when she was secretary of state, Clinton's campaign manager, John Podesta and her campaign manager Robby Mook -- they exchanged emails about how they were completely caught off guard by the discovery.

And then 30 minutes later, Podesta sent this email to Clinton aide Cheryl Mills. Quote, "We're going to have to dump all those emails, so better to do it now, sooner than later." Our own Jennifer Griffin asked the Clinton campaign about the email, and they're claiming that "dump" meant to release. OK, if that's the case, then why didn't Podesta just say "release" instead of "dump"?

And if we're going to be totally honest here, can you really take the Clinton campaign at their word about anything of any of this? After all, Hillary Clinton has changed her story about the use of a private server so many times, how could you believe any of this? Watch this.


HILLARY CLINTON, D-PRESIDENTIAL NOMINEE: The laws and regulations in effect when I was secretary of state allowed me to use my email for work.  That is undisputed.

It clearly wasn't the best choice, and I take responsibility for that decision.

I thought it would be easier to carry just one device for my work and for my personal emails instead of two.



CLINTON: IPhone. OK, in full disclosure...


CLINTON: ... and a Blackberry.

I have a -- you know, an iPad, a mini-iPad, an iPhone and a Blackberry.

I believe I have met all of my responsibilities, and the server will remain private.

In order to be as cooperative as possible, we have turned over the server.  They can do whatever they want to with the server.

I am confident that I never sent nor received any information that was classified at the time it was sent and received.

So that leaves the 100 out of 30,000 emails that Director Comey testified contain classified information.

I did not receive anything that was marked as classified.

Director Comey said that only three out of 30,000 had anything resembling classified markers.

QUESTION: (INAUDIBLE) did you wipe the server?

CLINTON: What, like with a cloth or something?


CLINTON: We turned over everything that was work-related, every single thing.


HANNITY: No, they didn't turn over everything. And by the way, it wasn't with a cloth. It was with BleachBit. Basically, they acid-washed it.

Now, for a minute, I know just for a minute, let's put aside Hillary Clinton's problem with telling the truth. Now, if the Clinton campaign really wants you to believe by saying dump they meant release, then why did they eventually delete 33,000 of those emails?

And if they were emailing about transparency and making the emails public, then why on March 4th, the same day the Benghazi select committee served Hillary Clinton a subpoena to preserve all emails related to the terror attack -- why then did Podesta write this to Cheryl Mills? Quote, "Think we should hold emails to and from the president of the United States?"

And why just a few days later, March 7th, after President Obama said he first learned about the server from journalists, from the news, why did Cheryl Mills email this? Quote, "We need to clean this up. He has e- mails from her, and they don't say State.gov."

Now, after being blindsided by the discovery of the private email server, it sounds like the campaign was quickly realizing how big a problem they had on their hands, which may then explain what happened next. According to the FBI's report on Clinton's server, just weeks later, on March 25th, Bill Clinton's staff, including Cheryl Mills -- they held a conference call with Platte Rivers (sic) Networks. Remember, they're the IT company. They were the server company that had the server in a bathroom closet that helped to manage the private server.

Well, on that same day that conference call place through March 31st, an employee of the company used BleachBit to permanently delete the 30,000 e- mails! Now, according to the FBI, the Platte Rivers Networks employee -- he claims he was told to destroy the emails in December of 2014, but he told investigators the reason he waited was because he simply forgot to do it.

Now, the timing of all of this is beyond questionable, especially given the fact that on March 9th, three weeks before the emails were permanently released, Platte Rivers Network was notified of a congressional order to preserve all of Clinton's records. The employee at the center of all of this admitted to the FBI that he knew of the order, but he did it anyway.

Joining us now with reaction, the author of "Treason," former speaker of the House, FOX News contributor Newt Gingrich. You know, Mr. Speaker, I'm a humble talk show host. We met in 1990. I've known you all these years.  You've become a dear friend, a close friend, a mentor. I admire you a lot.  I know you changed the country. You were one of two successful conservative movements that changed the country for the better.

Why is Sean Hannity the only one laying out the case that should be in the front page of The New York Times, The Washington Times (sic) ABC, NBC, CBS, CNN, MSNBC? Why is nobody covering this? Well, we do know part of the answer. They're colluding with the Clinton campaign. Why are they not covering this?

NEWT GINGRICH, R-FMR. HOUSE SPEAKER, FOX CONTRIBUTOR: Well, I think the dam is starting to break a little bit. You know, they hate the idea of Donald Trump winning. He's an assault on the entire establishment. They are desperate for Hillary to win, and they're trying to carry her to the finish line, no matter how corrupt, how embarrassing, how difficult.

But every day, it gets heavier and it gets harder. As I listen to you go through that list, by the way -- I was asking John Heinz (ph), who checked to make sure I was right -- there were 43 people in Watergate who were either indicted, tried or convicted. And I say that because as you watch more and more of this stuff, I don't see how John Podesta is going to stay out of legal trouble. I don't see how Cheryl Mills is going to stay out of legal trouble, Huma Abedin, a lot of those secondary players, the IT guy.

I mean, this is not just about Hillary Clinton. This is a large group of people who are being carried into behavior which is illegal. Much of it involves overt criminality. Certainly, Doug Band is, I think, at risk of being part of a RICO organized crime trial.

So you go down that list. I think there are a lot of people here who are going to -- despite everything that Attorney General Lynch has done to block it -- and it's quite clear now that she has been the primary blocking point and the people she appointed when she was in the Brooklyn office of the U.S. attorney, as Andy McCarthy has pointed out in a new column coming out tomorrow morning, that she's really at the heart of the effort to protect Hillary Clinton from her own criminal behavior.

HANNITY: Why is this so important? In other words, I guess in Watergate, like in this case, the coverup is worse than the crime. But she put a private email server in play. She knew the rules. She even advised everybody working at the State Department not to do something like that, not to use private devices. She lied about the number of devices she used.  She lied about sending or receiving classified information. But even the simple mishandling of classified information is against the law.  Destroying information is against the law.

Clearly, with the timeline I just laid out, they were trying to obstruct justice and circumvent the law. How did we get to the point where Comey in July let her off the hook? Do you think it might be related to the fact that it implicates the president?

GINGRICH: No, I think it's because the pressure was put to bear on him by the president and the attorney general in an effort to protect Clinton. I don't think at that stage, they thought they were protecting Obama. I thought they were protecting the Democratic nominee.

Now, I think in retrospect, Comey now realizes because of the rebellion in his own Federal Bureau of Investigation that he made the wrong decision.  It was unsustainable. He got the excuse this week courtesy of Anthony Weiner and 650,000 emails to reopen it.

And of course, people should not just focus narrowly on the emails. I think the five offices that are investigating, and apparently, according to The Wall Street Journal, have been investigating the Clinton Foundation for corruption for a year -- I think that investigation, frankly, is at least a big of a deal as the emails. And I think the level of corruption is unimaginable, and I don't think it's sustainable in the United States.

My new newsletter is about Hillary Rodham Nixon because I think she does the likelihood, if she were to stumble through to victory next Tuesday, which I doubt -- I think that the investigations would grind her up over the next year.

HANNITY: What about this new discovery that the person that is responsible now for investigating this and responding to Congress as it relates to the new probe happened to be the defense attorney for John Podesta? You know - - - you know, we said this last night. You can't even write this in your novel and have anybody believe it's a possibility!

GINGRICH: If I put all these pieces into "Treason," nobody would have thought it was possible. I merely have people who are loyal to ISIS and betrayed the United States government. This is vastly more complicated than anything I wrote.

But you know, I think that Senator Grassley and Chairman Goodlatte, the head of the Senate and House Judiciary Committees, should -- should -- should write a letter to the president demanding that a series of people recuse themselves. McCabe, whose wife got $675,000 from Hillary Clinton's ally, the governor of Virginia -- he has to recuse himself from all this stuff. I think the people in Justice who are close to Podesta -- they have to recuse themselves from all this stuff. The people who Lynch appointed, as Andy McCarthy points out, in the Brooklyn office of the U.S. attorney, all of whom are loyalists to Lynch, who is loyal to Clinton -- I mean, this is an absurdity!

And I think that they have to find a way to get independent people, career professionals, to come in and take this apart. And they have to remember that all of these special deals that none of us understood, that were involved with, you know, not going after the computers, destroying some of the computers by the government, actually, now it looks like were in defense of the corruption at the Clinton Foundation, not in defense of the emails.

So there's a lot here that very much like Watergate, you could start seeing people who are in the Justice Department being subjected to criminal procedures against them for their obstruction of justice...


HANNITY: ... got the Justice Department -- you have the Justice Department putting Podesta's hand-picked guy that, quote, "kept him out of jail" in charge of the investigation. Then we've got a report in Politico the Justice Department is pushing the FBI to finish the email-gate probe before the election!

How is it -- how is it possible, remotely possible, to go through 650,000 emails? Now, the only person that seems to be sticking up on the Democratic Party side that hasn't gone full Ken Starr on James Comey is the president that says he does not believe that James Comey is trying to influence the election.

What are you thoughts on that? Is this the big separation time?

GINGRICH: Well, I mean, first -- first of all, I thought it was a sign that when the number 6650,000 emails came out that Obama team suddenly went, Oops. Maybe we've finally gone too far. He has said a couple of other things, by the way, that being to kind of distance himself from Hillary.

Governor Rendell, former Democratic National Committee chairman, has also come out and said the FBI is doing the right thing. Senator McCaskill, who's one of Hillary's strongest defenders, said, you know, the FBI had no choice, they have to look into this stuff. You're beginning to see breaks in the armor because it's indefensible.

But my point here for the audience is broader. I believe there are people in the Justice Department who are guilty of obstruction of justice, as well as people in the Clinton operation, and I think that we may end up with an independent counsel. We may end up in a variety of steps.

But it's intolerable in the United States of America to have people who are government officials who are this incestuous, this involved and have this gigantic conflict of interest.

HANNITY: All right...

GINGRICH: And as you point out, when somebody's been the defense attorney, he can't be put in charge of the prosecution.

HANNITY: No, you can't. Good point. All right, we're going to have more with Newt Gingrich right after this break.

Also coming up tonight -- WikiLeaks exposes yet again how DNC interim chair Donna Brazile colluding with the Clinton campaign and helping Hillary cheat in her battle against Bernie Sanders. are his supporters mad? They should be tonight. Newt Gingrich will weigh in on that.

Plus tonight...


DONALD TRUMP, R-PRESIDENTIAL NOMINEE: In a newly released email, John Podesta has been caught saying, We have to dump all of those emails. Can you believe this? That's WikiLeaks!


HANNITY: Donald Trump calling out Hillary Clinton and her campaign for her email server scandal. Former New York City mayor Rudy Giuliani goes over the law in detail coming up straight ahead tonight.


HANNITY: And welcome back to "Hannity." Interim DNC chair Donna Brazile is in big trouble this week, this after Wikileaks released a new email showing Brazile allegedly giving yet another debate question to the Clinton campaign while she was actively employed by, oh, the Clinton news network.

Now, on March 5th of this year, just one day before a Democratic debate between Clinton and Bernie Sanders, Brazile sent an email to John Podesta and another Clinton aide with the subject line, "One of the questions directed to Hillary Rodham Clinton tomorrow is from a woman with a rash."

In the body of the message, Brazile wrote, "Her family has lead poisoning, and she will ask if -- what if anything will Hillary do as president to help people in Flint, Michigan?"

Now, after this email was made public, well, CNN announced that Brazile formally resigned from the network a few weeks ago, but Brazile still maintains her position at the DNC. Why is Hillary not demanding that a person that cheated Bernie Sanders, head of the DNC, is not fired?

Now, this is not the only instance of Clinton's team colluding with the mainstream media and a member of the DNC. Remember back in July, Debbie Wasserman Schultz -- she was forced to resign from her post as DNC chairwoman after a hacked email showed her calling a top Sanders aide, quote, "particularly scummy."

And that's not all. The leaked emails also show that DNC staffers -- they spoke about using Sanders's Jewish faith against him in West Virginia and Kentucky. So what must Bernie Sanders supporters be thinking?

There was also emails that, frankly, I view as kind of racist, misogynistic and sexist.

Back with more reaction, former speaker of the House Newt Gingrich. You know, if Donald Trump had emails from Reince Priebus that were sexist, misogynistic, anti-semitic and racist, I think Reince Priebus would be gone and not hired by Donald Trump. Debbie Wasserman Schultz was hired by Hillary Clinton. And then we got this other issue with poor Bernie Sanders with. Donna Brazile -- the fix was in from the get-go. Trump was right, they totally screwed Bernie Sanders! Your reaction.

GINGRICH: I mean -- I mean, now, look -- I mean, first of all, the surprise here is not Clinton. Clinton is corrupt. There's no reason to believe Clinton's going to do anything that involves reforming anything.

The fascinating thing is where is Bernie Sanders? I mean, how can Bernie Sanders sit quietly learning that the Democratic National Committee sabotaged him, learning that the current Democratic National Committee chair was apparently giving questions to Hillary Clinton for his debates with her?

Why isn't Bernie Sanders standing up and saying she needs to resign? And where are all the Sanders supporters? I mean, these people just got mugged by the Clinton machine, and they're all passive. I mean, I don't see anything fight on the left to say, How come these things are being allowed to happen? It's a remarkable collapse on the left at a time when the evidence is overwhelming that the nomination was stolen from them.

HANNITY: All right, Mr. Speaker, let me switch topics a little bit. I want to go to the polls. You said something on this show last night that I think surprised a lot of people, myself included. And that is, I said, OK, if Donald Trump wins North Carolina -- poll had him up 7 today, for example, in North Carolina -- it's a must-win state, from my perspective, for Donald Trump, as is Florida, as is Ohio, as is Iowa, as is Nevada and as is every other state that Governor Romney won back in 2012

The question is, how does he get to 270? Now, there's go to be a combination thereof where he gets a blue state, and that means he's also going to have to convert New Hampshire, Maine's 2nd congressional district.  If that doesn't work, he'll need the 5 electoral votes in New Mexico. If that doesn't work, he'll need Minnesota, Michigan, or Wisconsin or Pennsylvania.

And you said to me I'm wrong. I'm thinking -- I have a conventional thought process on electoral votes, and I want to dig deeper into the issue with you and have you explain what you mean.

GINGRICH: Well, this is actually something that Larry Sabato wrote about a couple of years ago in a book that I found fascinating. And he said, you know, if you think about it, it's not that there's an electoral lock by anybody. If your candidate's vote goes up, it tends to go up across the board, and all of a sudden, a lot of states start to fall into play.

So I mentioned to you on radio today this fascinating report by the -- the superintendent of education of Minnesota that Trump beat Clinton among high school students. 77,000 students voted, and Trump won Minnesota. Now, nobody in the country would have guessed that high school students in Minnesota would prefer Trump to Hillary Clinton.

It tells you that there's something happening out there. Minnesota could come into play. Wisconsin can come into play. Michigan can come into play. Pennsylvania can come into play. New Hampshire can come into play, New Mexico, Colorado, where I'll be tomorrow, Nevada, where I'll be on Thursday.

I mean, all of these things are coming along, and you suddenly realize that he breaks -- and I mentioned to you also today that people need to remember if he's now up 1 -- and who knows because this is the same poll where eight days ago, he was down 12, which was totally stupid. So who knows where he is. But let's say he's up 1 for a second. She is clearly winning California by a huge margin. California's a huge state. That means if you took California off of the table, he's probably nationally up 3 or 4 if he's up 1 with California included.

HANNITY: But what about the...

GINGRICH: He may even be up 5.

HANNITY: ... specific state polls that we're talking about?

GINGRICH: Well, I would say that he is potentially competitive at a minimum in the northern congressional district in Maine, in New Hampshire, in Pennsylvania, in Michigan, in Wisconsin, I believe in Minnesota, despite everybody's thoughts, and this high school poll today kind of bears that out. I think certainly in Colorado, certainly in New Mexico, certainly in Nevada.

HANNITY: I forgot Colorado. You're right.

GINGRICH: I mean, you suddenly have a lot of different things in play -- you suddenly have a lot of places in play that people don't think about.  And if, in fact -- I mean, a good friend of mine, Matt Towery (ph), who you know -- he's a great pollster...

HANNITY: I know Matt well.

GINGRICH: I sent him the North Carolina results. He said if he's really up 7 in North Carolina, the bottom is falling out of the Clinton campaign.  That's his term.

And so I can imagine a circumstance where as people look at 650,000 emails over here, they look at all of this corruption of the Clinton Foundation over here, they look at all these new Wikileaks about Podesta, and they just say, I can't do it.

I have a friend who has a young voter in their family, very liberal, Bernie Sanders supporter, walked in, knew he couldn't vote for Trump. Thought he might vote for Clinton. He was voting early voting. He looked at the ballot and he said, I cannot do it, skipped the presidency totally and went down ballot.


GINGRICH: Now, this is a Sanders vote who couldn't vote for Hillary. I also had...

HANNITY: Sanders voters were robbed!


HANNITY: Wikileaks exposed it all.

GIULIANI: Exactly.

HANNITY: They were robbed blind. The fix was in. I have got to run. By the way, I've got this -- I got this -- go ahead.

GINGRICH: No, I was just going say, Trump should (INAUDIBLE) an ad that says, If you're a Sanders voter, get even, don't vote for Hillary.

HANNITY: That's a great way to put it. By the way, and they probably agree with Trump on trade and a lot of other issues.

This is a Trump pen and we played it last night. You push the head down...


TRUMP: I will be the greatest president that God ever created.


HANNITY: I ordered 1,000 of them today, and I'm going to give them away probably early this -- late this week or early next week.

Mr. Speaker, appreciate it, as always. We'll see you back here tomorrow night.


HANNITY: I know. I can't help myself. It actually worked pretty good.


TRUMP: I'm really rich.


HANNITY: OK, one more.


TRUMP: I will build a great, great wall on our southern border, and I will have Mexico pay for that wall.


HANNITY: That's a pen. I'm going to give them away.

Coming up next tonight on "Hannity"...


TRUMP: In a newly released email, John Podesta has been caught saying, We have to dump all of those emails. Can you believe this? That's WikiLeaks!


HANNITY: Donald Trump -- he calls out Hillary Clinton and her campaign.  Up next, former New York city mayor, former prosecutor Rudy Giuliani will weigh in.

And also tonight...


TRUMP: If we don't repeal and replace "Obama care," we will destroy American health care forever!


HANNITY: It's being destroyed now. Donald Trump explaining why "Obama care" must be repealed and replaced immediately. We'll ask Laura Ingraham, who's here later tonight, to weigh in on that and much more straight ahead.



TRUMP: In a newly released email, John Podesta has been caught saying, We have to dump all of those emails. Can you believe this? That's Wikileaks! John Podesta -- I tell you what, if he worked for me, I would fire him so fast. He is such a nasty guy. He would -- I would fire him. Like "The Apprentice." John, you're fired!


TRUMP: Nasty guy.


HANNITY: And Donna Brazile and Debbie Wasserman Schultz -- let's see. She hires people that help her cheat. She hires people that have emails that are racist and sexist, misogynistic and anti-semitic! Oh, if that was Donald Trump, I guess they would have to be fired.

Anyway, that was more of Donald Trump earlier today talking about the latest Wikileaks revelations about the Clinton camp.

Also tonight, just how much trouble is top Clinton aide Huma Abedin really in? Now, we searched through the State Department Freedom of Information Act archive and found what appears to be a legal agreement signed by Abedin when she left the State Department. It's commonly known as an OF-109.  Now, by signing this, Abedin swore that she had turned over all classified documents to the federal government. But as we now know, the FBI is reportedly searching through 650,000 emails found on Anthony Weiner's laptop that could include and contain classified information from Huma.

Joining us now with reaction, former New York city mayor Rudy Giuliani. I actually have it right here. This is the OF-109 that we got -- by the way, the rest of the media, your lady people out there colluding with the Clintons, you could actually do this, too.

I have it right here. And Mr. Mayor, it actually has the 18 U.S. Code all of the issues you brought up. And we'll put them on the side of the screen. Huma Abedin -- every single one of those -- if she has classified material on there, isn't each one of those a felony?

RUDY GIULIANI, R-FMR. NEW YORK CITY MAYOR: Yes. Each one of them is.  And...

HANNITY: So you could have Huma and Anthony Weiner going to jail together?

GIULIANI: There's no question anymore as to whether or not Hillary Clinton, Abedin, Podesta, all these people violated the laws. You have to be almost stupid not to realize it.

The reality is, the thing that is really more shocking is the tremendous coverup that took place here. The corruption of the Justice Department is, to me, absolutely shocking. The fact that Podesta's lawyer is in charge of this investigation -- I thought Loretta Lynch had recused herself from this case. Yet she was telling -- she was telling the director of the FBI that he couldn't respond to Congress.

She was refusing to allow a grand jury, or at least her old district, the eastern district, was refusing to allow a grand jury here.

The Justice Department, it seems to me, is the one that corrupted this investigation. And there's got to be a couple of people there that are also going to be liable eventually when this gets investigated. Clinton, Abedin, the people right around them, Pagliano, these people are so guilty, as I said, you would have to be stupid not to realize it.

HANNITY: Let me put up the WikiLeaks revelation specific to the Clinton e- mail serve, because these are important. WikiLeaks has done two things that I think are very important. One, they show that we have no cyber- security. Two, they expose just how corrupt they are here. We're going to have to dump all of those emails, should we hold back subpoenaed emails between the president and the secretary of state. Correct me if I'm wrong.  You're the former prosecutor. Aren't all of those things crimes?

GIULIANI: Yes. And what it indicates is their first reaction. Their first reaction is to do something criminal. Let's see if we can dump them.  Maybe we can't dump all of them, let's see if we can dump some of them.  Rather than, we have nothing to lose and putting them all out there because we didn't do anything wrong. It indicates, again, that you would have --

HANNITY: That wasn't an option. They ended up deleting them all.

GIULIANI: Well, they deleted them all --

HANNITY: Or 33,000.

GIULIANI: And they bleached them.


GIULIANI: They bleached them, which is a pretty sophisticated level of crime. And now she wants the emails turned over. Hillary, if you wanted the emails turned over, what did you bleach them for?

HANNITY: Let me ask you about this Department of Justice official who notified Congress that the agency would dedicate all necessary resources to the reopened Hillary investigation. It turns out that John Podesta, again, thank you, WikiLeaks, referred to him as "the guy that saved me from jail."  Is that a conflict of interest? Maybe I'm living in a different world.

GIULIANI: It's 100 percent conflict of interest. Just like it was a conflict of interest for Cheryl Mills and the other person who got immunity to sit in as a lawyer when Hillary Clinton was being interviewed by the FBI. Just like Loretta Lynch, who said she recused her. Her involvement in this is one conflict of interest after another, after her meeting with Bill Clinton four days before the interview at an airport in I think Phoenix, or Tucson, Arizona. I would count for you so many conflicts of interest it would astound you.

They have corrupted the Justice Department in a way that I don't ever remember, even in the Watergate days. The people in the Justice Department resigned when they were asked to do things wrong. I'm so ashamed of the Justice Department and their role in this. And, you know, I think part of why Obama defended Comey is he realizes that Hillary Clinton infected his administration with massive corruption.

HANNITY: What do you think about the confidence that Obama gave Comey that he's not trying to interfere --

GIULIANI: I think it's sign that he realizes that his legacy may be -- may be the biggest scandal in the history of the country, bigger than Watergate, bigger than teapot dome. You've got so many parts to it.

HANNITY: And he's connected to it. She dragged him into it.

GIULIANI: Misuse of confidential, top secret information, jeopardizing possibly the lives of agents in the field. Then you have a multimillion, hundreds of millions of dollar fraud involved with the Clinton Foundation and the State Department. Just the mere fact that Huma Abedin worked for the State Department, the Clinton Foundation, and the Teneo Corporation. I don't remember when I was in the Justice Department somebody having two outside full-time jobs, one of them a complete conflict. Remember, she signed a document saying she was going to keep the Clinton Foundation separate from the State Department. So why is her top aide working for both. Explain that to me.

HANNITY: I'm running out of time. We're up on a hard break. If you were prosecuting this case based on the information you have now, give me a percent of accuracy that you would get a conviction? What do you think the odds are that you prosecuting this case would get convictions of high level officials?

GIULIANI: I've won cases much more difficult than this. I never guarantee a victory. I come pretty close to saying she could be convicted of all of the statutes. I say she could be convicted on all those statues I gave you a year ago, and now about four more. And then I would put on top of that a racketeering enterprise, the Clinton Foundation, Clinton Incorporated racketeering enterprise. If they had an Italian name, they would have been prosecuted already.

HANNITY: Wow. All right, Mr. Mayor, thank you so much for being with us.

And up next tonight on "Hannity."


TRUMP: If we don't repeal and replace Obamacare, we will destroy American health care forever.


HANNITY: Average Americans didn't keep their doctor, their plan. They're paying $4,100 more than they were paying before, and many states are seeing 100 percent increase from last year's premium to this year. Donald Trump laying out the reasons why Obamacare needs to be repealed and replaced.  Laura Ingraham is next with reaction. Also Monica Crowley and Larry Elder are here to weigh in on the mainstream media's bias.  



GOV. MIKE PENCE, R-IND., VICE PRESIDENTIAL CANDIDATE: When Donald Trump becomes president of the United States of America and we reelect strong Republican majorities in congress, we're going to repeal Obamacare lock, stock, and barrel.


TRUMP: I will ask Congress to convene a special session so we can repeal and replace. And it will be such an honor for me, for you, and for everybody in this country because Obamacare has to be replaced. And we will do it and do it very, very quickly. It is a catastrophe.


If we don't repeal and replace Obamacare, we will destroy American health care forever.


BAIER: Donald Trump and Indiana Governor Mike Pence earlier today laying out the reasons why Obamacare needs to be repealed and replaced.  Here with reaction, FOX News contributor, editor in chief of Lifezette, nationally syndicated radio host, the woman that never stops working 24/7, Laura Ingraham. Weren't you on "FOX AND FRIENDS" today?

LAURA INGRAHAM, EDITOR IN CHIEF, LIFEZETTE.COM: Only at 8:00 this morning.  Yes, I was. It's fun.


   HANNITY: You're a rock star.

INGRAHAM: Yes, yes.

HANNITY: Get me to 270.

INGRAHAM: Well, I think, Sean, this just broke like four hours ago where they had the list of the increases in Obamacare. OK, what percentage increases. This is really critical for the election. I think this is why Trump and Pence today did that speech in Pennsylvania. Check this out for me. Forgive me for not memorizing it all. But Pennsylvania, 53 percent increase in Obamacare premiums. It's get better. Go down to North Carolina, 40 percent increase in Obamacare premiums.

And then keep going, Minnesota, which is some of the polls there are kind of interesting. If he wins Minnesota it will be a blowout, no doubt about it. Minnesota 59 percent in Obamacare. Go down to North Carolina where a new poll came out tonight, Sean, shows that Trump is up, as you know. So in North Carolina it's not as bad, but it's still not as bad as 18.9 percent increase in Obamacare premiums.

The email scandal is big because it's about corruption in Washington and corruption with the Clintons. This is a financial disaster for millions of Americans, and it goes right to the pocketbook.

HANNITY: People didn't keep their doctors, their plan, and already the average family paying more than $4,100 more a year.

So let's assume he wins Florida, North Carolina, and Ohio. I think he'll get those states.

INGRAHAM: Yes, I do.

HANNITY: And he'll get Iowa. Tell me the state that's going to put him over the top? Pennsylvania, Minnesota, Michigan, Wisconsin, New Hampshire, New Mexico, Colorado, which one?

INGRAHAM: I think he has a good -- I mean, I know North Carolina has gone twice for Obama. It's turned liberal in many ways.

HANNITY: North Carolina went to Romney last time.

INGRAHAM: It went to Romney the second time. It went to Obama in 2008.  But I think North Carolina is going to go Trump. I think Wisconsin, if we got a little bit more united in Wisconsin, if Paul Ryan didn't look like Trump was the evil stepchild.

HANNITY: Good luck.

INGRAHAM: I think that would help a little bit. But, remember, I think Trump won Paul Ryan's district during the primary. I think Trump has a decent chance in Wisconsin. I know that's not on a lot of people's radar.

And I'm telling you, I think the state of Minnesota can be really unpredictable. And remember, a state that has a congresswoman like -- or had a congresswoman like Michele Bachmann and then a far left governor Mark Dayton, and then it had Norm Coleman, then it had Jesse Ventura. You just don't know what Minnesota is going to do, much like Maine, which people say is trending Hillary. And I lived four years in New Hampshire. I still don't believe the state with the license plate that says "Live Free or Die" is going to vote for Hillary Clinton given everything we know. I mean, it would be heartbreaking if New Hampshire decided to go with the Clintons after everything we've learned.

HANNITY: By the way, I'm going to send you a dozen of my Trump pens.

INGRAHAM: Oh, great. Oh, no.

TRUMP: I will be the greatest president that God ever created.


HANNITY: I ordered 1,000 of them. Why are you laughing at me? You're not allowed to laugh at me. We're friends. That's not allowed.

INGRAHAM: Because my kids will take them and get in trouble in school because they love Trump. They're going to get in trouble and fail.

HANNITY: Good. I'm going to send a note saying uncle Sean says it's OK to have the Trump pen.

INGRAHAM: OK, perfect. They're coming to play tennis at your tennis court, Sean.

HANNITY: You got it, deal. All right, Laura, I know you had a long day.  Thank you. Hopefully we'll see you tomorrow night.

INGRAHAM: Ok, sounds good. All right, bye.

HANNITY: And coming up, just seven days left until voters head to the polls, and a new study shows by the Media Research Center shows just how in the tank, how disgustingly in the tank the mainstream media is for Hillary Clinton. Larry Elder, Monica Crowley, they're next. And we'll tell you how you can get your Trump pen.

TRUMP: I will be the greatest president that God ever created.

HANNITY: He says other things, too.


HANNITY: All right, welcome back to "Hannity." Only seven days left to stop the Clinton-Obama machine. A new study by the Media Research Centers shows how biased the mainstream media really is. Since Friday's announcement the FBI was reopening their probe into Hillary Clinton's email server, a study found that ABC, NBC, CBS were critical of FBI Director James Comey over Hillary Clinton by a ratio of almost three to one. Journalism is dead.

Joining us now with reaction, radio talk show host Larry Elder, Fox News contributor Monica Crowley. Really? They took the whole Ken Starr bait hook, line, and sinker and they run with Comey as the problem as if he created the email server scandal, he's the one the lied, he's the one that used BleachBit, he's the one that used acid? Come on.  

MONICA CROWLEY, THE WASHINGTON TIMES: Look, Sean, none of this should come as a surprise. For decades we have known that the mainstream media, particularly national correspondents, particularly White House correspondents, have been biased to the left. Starting in 1964 Pew Research started polling those national correspondents, 94 percent of whom voted for Lyndon Johnson over Barry Goldwater. So we know that that's the case.

What makes this time different qualitatively and quantitatively is that we've never seen this level of activism before. And that grows not out of not any particular love for Mrs. Clinton. They don't actually like her.  But they hike she's a liberal and Democrat. They want to preserve the Obama legacy, and there is a hatred and fear of Donald Trump, because if Trump comes in, he's going to smash the existing order, and that includes the power and influence of the mainstream media.

HANNITY: Larry, to pick up on that, you talked a lot over the years over media bias, but he blows up the Republican establishment, the Democratic establishment, the media establishment, the globalist establishment, it's all shattered. He doesn't care about that old order anymore.

LARRY ELDER, SALEM RADIO NATIONAL SYNDICATED HOST: Well, he's not beholden to anybody. One of things about Donald Trump is he's been able to self- finance for the most part his own campaign. And add to that study, Sean, the WikiLeaks revelations that the Washington Post is doing an article of John Podesta, the chair of the Hillary Clinton campaign, uncovers something about a conflict of interest and said to him, don't worry about it. We're going to bury it.

New York Times gives Hillary veto proof over quotes she doesn't like.  And the moderator at one of the debates, John Harwood, who is both a reporter for the "New York Times" and an anchor for CNBC is writing Podesta a letter bragging about how he put Donald Trump on his ears.

There is a newspaper in "Central Florida," Sean, called the "Daily Commercial," and they put out an editorial, and they have apologized to their listeners for their one-sided, anti-Trump coverage. Where is the editorial from the "Washington Post," "The New York Times," CNBC? Where is it?

HANNITY: Larry, don't hold your breath.


HANNITY: Why is Donna Brazile, who cheated Bernie Sanders and is corrupt and fed questions, why isn't Hillary asked for her, why is she supporting a cheater, and why did she hire Debbie Wasserman Shultz after racist, sexist, misogynist, anti-Semitic emails were discovered that forced her out of the DNC?

CROWLEY: Yes. I mean, it really is incredible the level of collusion.  And that's why I say this election cycle takes the liberal activism on the part of the press to a whole other level. You have been saying journalism is dead for a long time, but I think what we're seeing this year, because Trump is such a black swan kind of candidate that the mainstream media cannot countenance him. So they have literally done everything they could, including with Donna Brazile helping Mrs. Clinton cheat.

HANNITY: Larry, last word.

ELDER: Donna Brazile was vice chair when she was feeding questions to Hillary. She did her job, Sean. Her job was to not to put her thumb on the scale, but put a cinderblock on the scale to make sure that Bernie Sanders didn't win.

HANNITY: I'll tell you how to get this Trump pen we come back. Monica gets a free one.

CROWLEY: I can't wait.

ELDER: I want one.


HANNITY: You got it.


HANNITY: All right, you see this pen? Everybody is asking about it. So I ordered 1,000. And now --

TRUMP PEN: I don't wear a toupee. It's my hair.

HANNITY: So I ordered 1,000, but I've just been told I have to check with Fox legal because everything is legal today -- but they're very nice people -- and we'll figure it out by tomorrow. But I'm going to give them away somehow, some way. See you tomorrow night.

Content and Programming Copyright 2016 Fox News Network, LLC. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED. Copyright 2016 CQ-Roll Call, Inc. All materials herein are protected by United States copyright law and may not be reproduced, distributed, transmitted, displayed, published or broadcast without the prior written permission of CQ-Roll Call. You may not alter or remove any trademark, copyright or other notice from copies of the content.