This is a partial transcript from "The O'REILLY Factor," Oct. 19, 2004, that has been edited for clarity.

Watch "The O'Reilly Factor" weeknights at 8 p.m. and 11 p.m. ET and listen to the "Radio Factor!"

BILL O'REILLY, HOST:  In the "Unresolved Problems" segment tonight, there is no question that  the swift boat vets have had a major impact on this presidential race.

Now, last night on “THE FACTOR”, we talked with Douglas Brinkley, the  author of "Tour of Duty" about John Kerry's Vietnam experience.  It's a  bestselling book.

This morning, we got a e-mail from some former Vietnam POWs who wanted  to tell their points of view.  Of course, we agreed to that.  These men are  patriots and are entitled to be heard.

First up, from San Antonio, Texas, Dr. Tom McNish, a retired Air Force  colonel who was held by the North Vietnamese for six-and-a-half years after  being shot down 12 miles northwest of Hanoi.

All right, Colonel.  You take it away.  Why did you call us, and what  do you want to say?

TOM MCNISH, M.D., FORMER VIETNAM POW:  Well, thank you very much for  letting me being on your program, Bill, and I — the main thing that I  wanted to bring out were that Mr. Brinkley's comments, which were mostly  grouped toward the end of his part last night, included three things which  I think were very wrong and needed to be at least addressed in a fair way.

Now, of course, Mr. Brinkley himself was only 10 years old when this  was going on, and so he cannot possibly have the feel for the sentiment of  those times.  He certainly can't share the sensitivities and the feelings  that those of us who had to interface with the enemy on a daily basis had.

He stated that only three of us believe that Mr. Kerry's activities  had any effect on our treatment.  He then went on to make statements that  seemed to imply that just because there wasn't torture that the treatment  must be OK and must not have been effected by Mr. Kerry.

I would point out that the enemy openly and freely admitted that they  were fighting a propaganda war against us.   Mr. Kerry's activities, both  in Paris where he secretly and perhaps illegally met with the enemy and  their negotiators to discuss their points of view and then coming home to  espouse their points of view and his activities which were filmed during  his testimony in the Senate, also during his episode of appearing to throw  medals over the wall, certainly enthused our guards and our interrogators  to a point where they — they took great pleasure in pointing out to us  that even though we had refused after four years of brutal treatment,  including fairly regular torture up until about 1969, 1970 — even though  we had refused to admit that we were war criminals, here they had an active  — well, an officer who had been in active duty, who was still in the  Reserve, who was saying — defaming both us and the soldiers who were still  fighting in the South.

O'REILLY:  Now, Doctor, did you ever hear them...

MCNISH:  I sincerely believe...

O'REILLY:  Yes.  Doctor, did you hear them mention the name John  Kerry?  Did anybody mention that name to you?

MCNISH:  Bill, I can't swear that I heard that name.  I definitely and  positively remember hearing voices and transmissions which were reported to  have been from representatives of Vietnam veterans against the war.  I now  know that Mr. Kerry was certainly the most outspoken of those.

I — since I've gotten home and seen some of the things which were Mr.  Kerry's and were pointed out to be him, I remember having been shown those  by the Vietnamese while I was in prison and having that used against me to  claim that, see, you are a war criminal, and, when this war is over, we're  going to — to prosecute you as a war criminal.

Regardless of the fact that Mr. Kerry himself believed the North  Vietnamese and the Viet Cong when they said, oh, yes, if you guys  surrender, withdraw unilaterally, we'll let the prisoners come home, that  would never have happened.  That is the absolute naivete that could exist,  and that naivete in dealing with the al Qaeda today would result in nothing  but national disaster.

O'REILLY:  All right, Doctor.  We appreciate you coming on and giving  us your point of view.  Certainly, you're certainly a patriot.  And thanks  again.

And now from Washington, we're going to get another point of view on  this.  Ambassador Pete Peterson, also a former Vietnam POW and former  ambassador to Vietnam under President Clinton.

All right.  You just heard the doctor who, you know, spoke very  eloquently and from the heart.  How do you reply, Mr. Ambassador?

PETER PETERSON, FORMER VIETNAM POW:  Well, I'm actually saddened that  I'm actually having to debate Tom.  He and I were locked up in Vietnam for  almost identical periods of time, and our lives crossed paths many times  there and, of course, here as well.

But I'm really very upset, frankly, that we have vet against vet now,  which has been promulgated by this new film that Mr. Sherwood has created  essentially for his own purposes, I think, and, in fact, we have a  circumstance where we're politicizing and stealing the honor of the service  that we POWs made in Vietnam.

O'REILLY:  But didn't the — didn't the POWs and swift boat vets come  before the film?  Weren't the sentiments that the doctor just offered up  really in the hearts of these men before any film was made?

PETERSON:  I — you know, I think they must have thought they were  really making a documentary, but the swift boat allegations, to my  knowledge, have been proven to be false.

O'REILLY:  Some.  Some are true, and some are not.

PETERSON:  You know, one can make all of that...

O'REILLY:  You know, we did a major investigation that angered both  sides, and we found that some are true and some — but the point, Mr.  Ambassador, is this: You do have men like the doctor who — you know, look,  he's sincere.  He believes...

PETERSON:  Of course.

O'REILLY:  ... that his ordeal, all right, was made worse by the  actions of Senator Kerry, and I don't know how to deal with that.  I can't  tell him he's wrong because I don't believe that.

PETERSON:  Well, let me — well, let me say that I think he's wrong.   I was there.  I've never heard John Kerry's name uttered.  I don't recall  any kinds of transmission to myself that would indicate that there was  something out there, if you will, in the anti-war movement.

Now I had an interrogator on one occasion say, you know, there are  anti-war demonstrations in the United States.  Did I believe my  interrogators? Absolutely not.  In fact, we were trying to resist.

O'REILLY:  But they were telling you the truth.

PETERSON:  Well...

O'REILLY:  You didn't believe them, but they were telling you the  truth.

PETERSON:  Look, did I start out my prison life believing my  interrogators?  Give me a break.  I'm not going to do that, and I — what  I'm saying is that the differences of opinion here is that we are having an  argument about what happened 30 years ago as opposed to what's happening  now.  The last I looked, we only have one war going on, and that's Iraq.   Why are we fighting Vietnam?

O'REILLY:  No, but I think it — with all due respect — and I said  that before, 35 years ago, people change, men change.  But I think there is  a core issue.  There has to be because this is too big a story.  It hasn't  gone away in months, and it will continue for the next two weeks.

The core issue is that men like the doctor feel betrayed.  They feel  betrayed.  And other men like Kerry's boat mates, most of them, feel that  he did his duty.  So you have two differences of opinion sincerely held.

PETERSON:  Yes, let me...

O'REILLY:  Don't you believe that John Kerry should talk directly to  the doctor?  See, I would have done that.  If I were John Kerry, I would  have said, listen, Doctor, I want to talk to you about this.  Let's hash it  out.  That's what he should have done.

PETERSON:  If we weren't in the middle of a political campaign, he  probably would have.

O'REILLY:  But this is the political campaign.  Who is John Kerry?

PETERSON:  Let me finish, if I may.

O'REILLY:  Sure.

PETERSON:  The reality is — and I think Tom made note of this — our  treatment got better after late 1970.  In fact, I don't know that we can  attribute any direct torture to the anti-war movement.

And let me point out, at the same time that the anti-war movement was  ongoing, Ross Perot had a very strong movement to bring us home alive in  which my wife worked very deeply with him, traveled all over the United  States and, of course, Europe and Asia as well.

In fact, I believe they actually met the Vietnamese in this process,  and they weren't traitors, and they didn't do anything wrong, and I think  they helped bring us home early.

O'REILLY:  OK.  All right.  Well, look, it's a very emotional issue.    And, Mr. Ambassador, we respect you and your service very much, and we  appreciate you coming on the program.

Content and Programming Copyright 2004 Fox News Network, L.L.C. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED. Transcription Copyright 2004 eMediaMillWorks, Inc. (f/k/a Federal Document Clearing House, Inc.), which takes sole responsibility for the accuracy of the transcription. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED. No license is granted to the user of this material except for the user's personal or internal use and, in such case, only one copy may be printed, nor shall user use any material for commercial purposes or in any fashion that may infringe upon Fox News Network, L.L.C.'s and eMediaMillWorks, Inc.'s copyrights or other proprietary rights or interests in the material. This is not a legal transcript for purposes of litigation.