Democratic presidential candidates are in a multibillion-dollar rush to offer competing prescriptions for the nation's ailing health care system. But some party activists want them to slow down. Take a breath. And don't forget: The issue should be used against President Bush, not each other.

Rank-and-file Democrats, in interviews around the country Tuesday, said the health care crisis is symptomatic of a sluggish economy and is a perfect issue to underscore the pitfalls of Bush's tax-cutting policies.

"If everybody had a good job where the employer provided health insurance, we wouldn't have this problem," said Jeff Link, a Democratic strategist in Iowa.

But the issue has emerged as a major policy fight among the nine Democrats pursuing the nomination. Candidates are magnifying minor differences in their plans, distorting each others' positions and expending enormous energy on short-term tactical questions that ignore their long-term goal: Defeat Bush.

"Do you need a health care plan? Yes, you do. But to win the primary, to win my vote, you've got to convince me that you can take the economic issue to the country and beat George Bush," said Kathleen Sullivan, chairwoman of the New Hampshire Democratic Party (search).

"You know the old saying: Can't see the forest through the trees? Well, we've got nine trees. I want somebody looking at the forest," she said.

Former Vermont Gov. Howard Dean entered the health care sweepstakes Tuesday with an $88.3 billion plan to expand existing health care systems and slash tax breaks for corporations that fail to provide insurance to workers.

Dean's plan will be measured against Missouri Rep. Dick Gephardt, who announced last month that he would require all employers to insure their workers. Gephardt's proposal would reimburse companies for 60 percent of their health care costs, and repeal Bush's tax cuts to cover the $200 billion-plus annual cost.

There are as many as 60 million Americans who lack health insurance year-round, millions more than when former President Clinton failed to overhaul the system in the early 1990s. Democrats are now more cautious, proposing incremental changes in the current system.

Rahm Emanuel (search), an Illinois congressman who served in the Clinton White House, said the issue is still potent because so many Americans have either lost health insurance or are afraid they soon won't be able to afford it.

"All candidates will be judged by the template Dick (Gephardt) laid out," said Emanuel, who has not sided with any candidate.

Gephardt, a 26-year veteran of Congress, used his first-of-the-field plan to counter critics who said he was devoid of new ideas.

With his proposal, Dean hopes to shed his image as a one-issue, anti-war candidate.

Sen. John Kerry of Massachusetts plans to differentiate himself from Gephardt and Dean by placing a heavy emphasis on containing health care costs when he unveils his plan Thursday, aides said.

USA Today reported Kerry's plan would cost up to $80 billion but would include significant cost controls, including steps aimed at reducing premiums and prescription drug costs.

Kerry would expand federal and state premiums to cover children and low-income parents. He would offer tax credits to help small businesses and uninsured adults buy into the health care program that covers the president and Congress.

Sen. Joseph Lieberman of Connecticut will enter the health care debate May 21 in Washington when he outlines a plan to concentrate federal, private and institutional efforts on researching and curing major diseases, aides said.

In weeks to come, Sen. Bob Graham of Florida will join Dean in seeking an expansion of a program for low-income families. Sen. John Edwards of North Carolina, like Gephardt, wants to make Medicare more available and, like Kerry, will propose ways to control health care costs.

Only Rep. Dennis Kucinich of Ohio is proposing anything as sweeping as the Clinton plan. Considered a long shot for the nomination, Kucinich would transform the nation's health care system into a government-run, single-payer program.

"We must remember that the important distinction in this election isn't the details of the Democratic plans," Dean said in his Columbia University speech. "It's the distinctions between Democrats - who view this as a moral imperative - and President Bush, who for over two years has failed to address this issue."

Dean struck the right chord, turning the health care crisis into an indictment of Bush's economic policies that favor tax cuts over health care coverage, Democratic activists said. Backing off earlier criticism of the Gephardt plan, Dean also vowed to keep the debate "on a positive tone."

But he didn't stop there.

The physician-turned-politican noted there were no mandates in his plan, a jab at Gephardt's bid to force companies to cover employees. "That will only lead to another decade without coverage for 41 million Americans," Dean said.

Link, the Iowa Democrat, said even dedicated Democratic voters couldn't follow the complex health care debate waged by then-Vice President Al Gore and rival Bill Bradley in the 2000 Democratic race.

And that should be a lesson for this year's crop.

"They all need to get a leg up on the field by showing that they can take it to Bush politically as opposed to nitpicking each other's health care plans," Link said.