Following is a transcript from Fox News Sunday, Oct. 21, 2001.
TONY SNOW, HOST, FOX NEWS SUNDAY: Now joining us from Shanghai, China, Secretary of State Colin Powell.
Secretary Powell, the president has been meeting with Asian leaders this week, especially talking with China about possible cooperation in Operation Enduring Freedom. Can China help us with intelligence?
COLIN POWELL, SECRETARY OF STATE: We hope so. And we had good conversations with the Chinese leadership, and the president in his first meeting with the president of China, I think, hit it off very well. A good relation was formed. And I think that in the weeks and months ahead we can look at intelligence cooperation, financial activities, all sorts of things.
The Chinese were supportive, and we are very pleased with their support, as well as the joint statement that was provided by the APEC leaders, coming down strongly on the side of the coalition against terrorism.
SNOW: You mentioned financial activities. Do we suspect that Al Qaeda has been doing some banking operations through China?
POWELL: I don't have any knowledge of that, but I'm sure that our intelligence agencies, if they do have information of that kind, will make it available to the Chinese.
And the level of cooperation that I have seen from them so far in my conversations with Foreign Minister Tang and in the president's conversations with President Jiang Zemin, I think they would be responsive.
SNOW: There's an ongoing debate here in the states, you're well aware of, that some people think that we are spending more time maintaining a coalition than running a war. Can we work with the coalition? Is the coalition ready now to say to the United States, OK, go ahead, do what you need to do to bring down the Taliban if that's what it requires?
POWELL: Nothing in the coalition, no aspect of the coalition, keeps the American president from doing what he feels he has to do to go after Al Qaeda and to deal with the Taliban. But his efforts are so magnified by the presence of a coalition.
This is a coalition that came together to go after this common enemy, terrorism. And the suggestion that somehow the coalition keeps us from doing what we want to do is just absolutely wrong.
Quite the contrary. Without this coalition, we wouldn't be able to do what we are doing. We wouldn't be getting the support from the Central Asian nations. We wouldn't be getting the support from the United Nations, the United Kingdom. Everybody has come together for this common goal.
And so, coalition, in this sense, is a good word. And to suggest that somehow it is in competition with what the president wants to do is simply a misreading of reality.
SNOW: We want the Northern Alliance to be part of a coalition government within Afghanistan. We do not want them to be the dominant partner, correct?
POWELL: I think that's a fair statement. They are a minority group, and I think if we want a stable Afghanistan, all parts of Afghan society in the Afghan political spectrum have to be represented. And the Northern Alliance would have to be represented.
It would be an important part of that new government, but at about 15 percent of the population, I don't even think they think that they're in a position at this time to be the dominant figure. They would certainly be an important part of the post-Taliban government.
SNOW: The Pashtun are the largest ethnic group in the country. Also they have close ties with Pakistan. Can Pakistan help us persuade the Pashtun to play a more active role in trying to form a post-Taliban coalition?
POWELL: I think they can, and I think the Pakistanis are being helpful now. I had good conversations with President Musharraf, and he understands now that the Taliban, its days are numbered, and we have to start looking toward the future. And we talked about that.
And as you know, Ambassador Richard Haass, on my staff, is now working with the United Nations and other nations who have an interest in this to see what kind of an arrangement can and should be worked out to deal with the post-Taliban era.
SNOW: There are reports that the United Nations may request the cessation of bombing right now because it is hampering humanitarian efforts within Afghanistan. If the United Nations were to make that request, what would the American reply be?
POWELL: I'm not aware of any such request, and we have been conducting our military campaign in a way that it would not interfere with humanitarian efforts.
We're constantly reviewing this. And, as you know, our airplanes are providing humanitarian aid through airdrops. And we're working hard to get truck convoys in, because that's how you get the heavy tonnages in. And we're trying to do it and, at the same time, conduct a military operation.
So we do not have such a request. The reports are mixed as to how much food is getting in, and when I get back to Washington, this is one of the first things I'll be looking at. Because this war is not against the Afghan people. We have to prepare them for the winter that is just a few weeks away, and we'll be making every effort to do that.
SNOW: As winter approaches, it is important for us to achieve such strategic goals as taking Kabul or even Kandahar before the onset of winter?
POWELL: I think it would be in our interest and the interest of the coalition to see this matter resolved before winter strikes and it makes our operations that much more difficult.
The actual seizure of land in which cities might be the right ones to cause that to come about, I'm not sure. But certainly the Northern Alliance is on the march in the North toward Mazar-e-Sharif, and I think they're gathering their strength to at least invest Kabul or start moving on Kabul more aggressively.
SNOW: There's been talk also of ceasing operations or slowing them down during the Muslim holy month of Ramadan. Good idea, bad idea?
POWELL: Well, we have to be respectful of that very, very significant religious period. But at the same time, we also have to make sure we pursue our campaign. So, I will yield to my Pentagon colleagues as to what might be required if we are still in this kind of a military campaign mode when Ramadan approaches in the middle of November.
SNOW: You're a military man. It sounds to me like what you're saying, even though you're now secretary of state, from a military point of view, you can't really cease hostilities at that point.
POWELL: Well, I think it depends. It depends on what more has to be done, what the military operation looks like at that point. So I don't want to speculate on what we might be ready to do at the middle of November. And it's best that I remember that I am secretary of state and no longer wearing a uniform, and not speculate on what my military colleagues are thinking or what Don Rumsfeld is thinking over in the Pentagon.
SNOW: Senator John McCain is saying he's a little unhappy right now with the roles of Egypt and Saudi Arabia. He says they're playing both ends of it. And, on the one hand, they permit mullahs and Islamic Muslim speakers to issue anti-American diatribes weekly. On the other hand, they say from time to time, no, no, no, we're really with you. Is it important for the United States to say to both of those nations, especially on the propaganda front, that is the kinds of discourse they're permitting, to say, you need to be with us?
POWELL: Well, they are with us. I mean, both Egypt and Saudi Arabia have responded to every request we have made of them. Saudi Arabia was especially helpful just a few days ago, when they held the Organization of the Islamic Conference, and 56 Islamic nations came to the support of the coalition by condemning terrorism. And Saudi Arabia played an important role in achieving that outcome. So they are being responsive.
At the same time, they do have public opinions. They have people within those two countries who are not happy with what we are doing. And I think it's a little odd for us to say to them, you have to muzzle dissent, you have to muzzle those who are speaking out against us. I think, if we want them to be the kind of nations and lands that we preach about, we have to expect that, if there is another point of view within that country that differs from the official point of view of the government, you have to give it the opportunity to be expressed.
SNOW: Secretary Powell, the president met with his Russian counterpart today. Is American policy on the ABM Treaty unchanged, which is to say that we're prepared within the next six months to begin testing of technologies that may, in fact, require us to abrogate the treaty?
POWELL: I don't think that is yet American policy, Tony. What the president has said all along, and what he said again to President Putin this evening, was that the ABM Treaty is a relic of the past. We need to move beyond it.
I was pleased that President Putin responded that we are in a new era, and there are some new ideas on the table, there are some new parameters we should be looking at. And Foreign Minister Ivanov and I and Donald Rumsfeld and his counterpart, Defense Minister Sergei Ivanov, will be working hard in the weeks ahead, approaching Crawford, when President Putin visits with President Bush again, and beyond Crawford, to see how we can move forward. President Bush has made it clear, however, that, in due course, if we aren't able to get an agreement that'll allow us to move forward in a new framework, he is prepared to unilaterally withdraw from the treaty, because he is determined to move forward with missile defenses, and he has said that to President Putin from the first day they met.
SNOW: Secretary of State Colin Powell, thanks for joining us.
POWELL: You're welcome, Tony.