Published October 18, 2016
Many doctors who order CT or MRI scans for patients with low back pain do so fearing that patients will be upset if they do not get imaging and because there is too little time to explain the risks and benefits of the tests, a new study found.
The Choosing Wisely campaign, launched by the American Board of Internal Medicine in 2012, recommends against imaging scans for low back pain unless there are specific "red flags." But a study earlier this year found that almost a third of lumbosacral magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) scans in the Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) were "inappropriate," the authors note.
"Overuse of diagnostic tests is a common problem in healthcare as a whole, and affects both the VA and private-sector settings," said coauthor Dr. Erika D. Sears of the Veterans Affairs Center for Clinical Management Research in Ann Arbor, Michigan. "Low back pain is often highlighted because it is a common condition where overuse of imaging or treatments can consume a high level of resources."
Sears and colleagues surveyed 579 VA physicians, nurse practitioners and physician assistants, including demographic questions and a hypothetical scenario in which a 45-year-old woman with nonspecific low back pain requested a computed tomography (CT) scan or MRI.
Only 3 percent of clinicians thought the patient would benefit from having a CT or MRI scan, and more than three-quarters said they would worry such a scan would lead to more unnecessary tests or procedures.
But just as many also felt they would not be able to refer the woman to a specialist without obtaining imaging first, and more than half worried she would be upset if she didn't get the imaging she wanted.
About 15 percent of clinicians thought it would be difficult for them to follow the recommendation against imaging, but 63 percent believed it would be difficult for most patients to accept it, as reported in JAMA Internal Medicine.
"You see the headlines of major sports stars getting an MRI tomorrow, so some high school athlete or college athlete or recreational athlete thinks if Derek Jeter got one why don't I," said J. C. Andersen, chair of the department of Health Sciences and Human Performance at The University of Tampa, Florida, who was not part of the new study.
"Tony Romo of the Cowboys got an MRI, but they've got lots of resources that the rest of us don't have, and it may or may not have helped him get any better," Andersen said.
Infographics or posters in doctor's office waiting rooms may help explain this to some patients, as doctors themselves may not have time to go into depth, he told Reuters Health by phone. But work still needs to be done on communicating this public health message.
"Our study showed that almost all clinicians were aware that an imaging test was not indicated for a patient with low back pain without danger signals of severe spinal problems and agreed with the Choosing Wisely recommendations to not do testing," Sears told Reuters Health by email. "Instead, clinicians worried about not having sufficient time to explain the risks and benefits of testing to patients, were concerned over medical liability if tests are not ordered or rare diagnoses are missed, and noted that they cannot refer patients to specialists without first ordering imaging, even if they think the imaging will not change patient management."
CT scans expose the patient to radiation, which can add up over time, and even without inherent dangers an unnecessary test could reveal an unexpected finding that may be insignificant to a patient's health but lead to more testing, and sometimes complications, Sears said.
"Patients should first have a thorough history and physical exam to rule out presence of 'red flag' symptoms and are often first referred to physical therapy in the initial treatment period," she said. "Because low-back pain tends to come back, staying active, through activities such as walking, yoga, and supervised training, is key to warding off recurrence."