RELIGION

Idaho GOP pushes bill banning Islamic law in state courts

FILE--In this Jan. 9, 2017, file photo, Idaho Rep. Eric Redman, R-Athol, studies the house seating chart as he waits for the State of the State address inside the house chambers at the state Capitol building, in Boise, Idaho. Republicans on an Idaho House agreed Wednesday, Feb. 1, 2017, to introduce anti-Sharia law legislation designed to prevent Idaho courts or government agencies from making decisions based on Islamic or other foreign legal codes. This is the second time Redman, a Republican, has pushed the bill in the Idaho Statehouse and he says the bill is needed to protect American values. (AP Photo/Otto Kitsinger, file)

FILE--In this Jan. 9, 2017, file photo, Idaho Rep. Eric Redman, R-Athol, studies the house seating chart as he waits for the State of the State address inside the house chambers at the state Capitol building, in Boise, Idaho. Republicans on an Idaho House agreed Wednesday, Feb. 1, 2017, to introduce anti-Sharia law legislation designed to prevent Idaho courts or government agencies from making decisions based on Islamic or other foreign legal codes. This is the second time Redman, a Republican, has pushed the bill in the Idaho Statehouse and he says the bill is needed to protect American values. (AP Photo/Otto Kitsinger, file)  (The Associated Press)

Republican lawmakers in Idaho again are pushing legislation designed to prevent state courts or government agencies from making decisions based on Islamic religious law or other foreign legal codes.

The bill was introduced Wednesday in a House committee a year after a similar proposal made it to the House floor but died. There are no known cases in which an Idaho judge has based a ruling on Shariah law.

Fears over Islamic religious law and Muslim immigration have been growing in Idaho and reinforced inside the deeply conservative Statehouse with President Donald Trump's order temporarily banning immigration from seven Muslim-majority nations.

Boise, the capital, is one of a handful of smaller U.S. cities that has accepted outsized numbers of Syrian refugees, at 108. Most refugees settle there or in Twin Falls, whose refugee resettlement center critics have argued should be shut down. No Syrians have resettled in that city.

The new legislation doesn't mention a specific religion or country. It says courts, administrative agencies or state tribunals can't base rulings on any foreign law or legal system that would not grant the parties the same rights guaranteed by state and U.S. constitutions.

But its sponsor acknowledges that the measure stems from concerns over Shariah law.

"State legislators have a role to play in protecting constitutional rights and American values of liberty and freedom," Rep. Eric Redman said.

Nine states — Alabama, Arizona, Louisiana, Kansas, Mississippi, North Carolina, Oklahoma, South Dakota and Tennessee — have enacted legislation on the application of foreign or religious laws in state courts, according to the National Conference on State Legislatures. Nine others have introduced such measures during legislative sessions this year, including nearby Montana and Oregon.

Last year, Redman's original proposal made it out of committee despite House Democrats decrying the use of pictures of a severed hand and a man about to be beheaded in the information packet that Redman distributed. The pictures were pasted in between definitions of Shariah law.

The bill never made it past the House floor after lawmakers adjourned for the year without debating it.

"We have freedom of religion here, but they don't have the right to bring their Shariah law overreach on our constitutional laws," Redman said Wednesday.

The House State Affairs Committee agreed to introduce the bill with just two Democratic lawmakers voting against it. The bill now goes on to a full legislative hearing, which has not yet been scheduled.

Trump's other orders on immigration have prompted other legislation in Idaho. Two days ago, another Republican introduced legislation that would punish cities and counties for passing immigrant-protecting "sanctuary city" policies — even though the state has none.