Menu

Short Legs May Have Made Human Ancestors Better Fighters

Our ape-like predecessors kept their stout figures for 2 million years because having short legs ironically gave them the upper hand in male-to-male combat for access to mates, finds a new study.

Early hominins in the genus Australopithecus, which lived from 4 million to 2 million years ago, are considered immediate predecessors of the human genus Homo, and had heights of around 3 feet 9 inches for females and 4 feet 6 inches for males.

Until now, the squat physiques of australopiths and other human predecessors were considered an adaptation for climbing in tree canopies.

• Click here to visit FOXNews.com's Evolution & Paleontology Center.

Like surfing or any other sport that requires balance, having a lower center of mass boosts stability and, in turn, success at physical activity.

"The old argument was that [apes] retained short legs to help them climb trees that still were an important part of their habitat," said study author David Carrier, a biologist at the University of Utah. "My argument is that they retained short legs because short legs helped them fight."

Body measurements

Carrier examined hind-limb lengths and indicators of aggression in eight primate species, including gorillas, chimpanzees, bonobos (dwarf chimpanzees), orangutans, black gibbons, siamang gibbons, olive baboons and dwarf guenon monkeys.

They also included one group of humans — Australian aborigines, representative of a population only recently Westernized.

As indicators of aggression, Carrier looked at the weight difference between males and females and the male-female difference in length of canine teeth, which are used for biting during battle.

Studies have shown greater aggression in primate species in which males tipped the scales relative to females.

Primates with the stoutest figures also ranked high on both aggression measurements.

For instance, the gibbons boasted longer legs than other apes and also ranked low on the aggression scale.

In contrast, male gorillas, which are more than double the size of females, were stout.

The lengthy legs didn't keep gibbons away from canopies, however.

"Gibbons are the best acrobats in the animal kingdom. There are no other animals that can move through the canopy the way a gibbon can," Carrier told LiveScience. "And they contrast male gorillas, which hardly ever climb. When they do climb, they stay close to the trunk — they spend most of the time on the ground."

Carrier noted exceptions to the short-limb rule. While bonobos have shorter legs than chimps, they are less aggressive.

Human aggression

Even though Australopiths walked upright on the ground, they retained short legs for 2 million years for the same reason squatness helped out other great apes — for male-male combat.

With the advantage in combat, short-legged primates would likely be victorious and gain access to females. That meant passing their genetic traits, like shortness, to offspring.

Just because humans have long legs doesn't make us less aggressive. Rather, the longer legs are a product of humans' specialization for distance running.

The tendency toward aggression in ape ancestors could have carried through evolutionary history to become a characteristic of modern humans, Carrier suggests.

He says that's surprising, since humans are considered such advanced animals.

"To some extent, our evolutionary past may help us to understand the circumstances in which humans behave violently," Carrier said. "There are a number of independent lines of evidence suggesting that much of human violence is related to male-male competition, and this study is consistent with that."

The study is published in the March issue of the journal Evolution.

Copyright © 2007 Imaginova Corp. All Rights Reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.