This is a partial transcript from "Hannity & Colmes," Sept. 30, 2004, that has been edited for clarity.

Watch "Hannity & Colmes" weeknights at 9 p.m. ET!

ALAN COLMES, CO-HOST:  Welcome to a special post-debate edition of Hannity & Colmes.  I'm Alan Colmes coming to you live from Spin Alley at the  University of Miami.  We'll be joined tonight by Richard Holbrooke, Peggy Noonan, General Tommy Franks,  Senator Bob Graham and Dick Morris.  But first, joining us now is senior advisor to the Bush campaign, Karen Hughes.  Karen, thanks so much for being here tonight.

KAREN HUGHES, SENIOR BUSH CAMPAIGN ADVISOR:  Great to be here.  Thanks for having me.

COLMES:  Well this is one of those deals where the people who support  the President will say he did great.  People who support Senator Kerry will say he did great...

HUGHES:  Well, I think what the American people will say is that they  saw tonight a president who is absolutely committed to keeping them and their families safe.  And he was able to wage and win this war against terror.  On the other hand, they saw a candidate who  sort of was incoherent, once again on his position on Iraq.

COLMES:  But the question is, "Will minds be changed tonight?"  That  really is the goal.  To get the swing voters, the independent voters.

HUGHES:  Well, I think so.  I think when people look at the President  tonight, they saw his heart, they saw his strength, they saw that - how deeply he feels about the  lives of the soldiers that he has put at risk for what he believes is absolutely the right reasons and for the  safety and security of our country.

COLMES:  Where do you think the President could have done a little better?

HUGHES:  Well, I'm not the right person to ask that.  Ask one of  Senator Kerry's - I thought that he did a wonderful job of, again, showing his heart, showing the depth  of his convictions of what we have to do to win this war against terror.  Of showing how he comes to work  every morning worried about protecting the American people and doing the best job he can of waging  and winning the war on against...

COLMES:  I don't think anybody...

HUGHES:  And the great progress that we're making, and the great  progress we're making in that...

COLMES:  I don't...

HUGHES:  Senator Kerry, on the other hand, had to - I think had one  critical test tonight, and that was to try to establish some credibility on the major issue in this  campaign, which is Iraq.  And not only did he fail to do that, but he made his hole even deeper by saying that  the war was a mistake.  This was a war he voted for...

COLMES:  Well, you...

HUGHES:  That he said was the right thing to do...

COLMES:  No Karen, you say that he made a - you know, that you don't  think he advanced his cause tonight, but I thought he was actually pretty clear about that  once again saying that he voted to give the President the authority under certain conditions.  But he felt those  conditions weren't met and that is why he felt he had been misled.  And that why he cast the vote but  didn't believe that the President acted properly.

HUGHES:  The only problem with that, Alan is that in 1991 when he voted  against the Gulf War, he said he knew it was a vote to go to war, that these votes are not  votes to authorize force or to wait and see or to give authority.  But they're votes to go to war.  And that is  -- he stood up on this floor of the Senate, he talked about the threat that Saddam Hussein posed, he talked  about the only thing consistent, about Senator Kerry's position through all this has been his willingness  to change positions when the heat gets on...

COLMES:  But he said...

HUGHES:  He did it during the democratic primary.

COLMES:  He also said tonight, though, that when he voted back then and  President Bush 41 stopped - and he actually quoted what Brent Scowcroft said about not  going into Baghdad because there was no exit strategy to do that, and he was very clear.  That was a very  different kind of a war and he talked about that tonight.

HUGHES:  And you know what?  That exposed his fatal misunderstanding.  And that is that he doesn't understand the difference that September 11th made.  September  11th, we were attacked.  And that's the difference.  That is a big difference...

COLMES:  Not by Iraq.

HUGHES:  ...from 11 years before.  By terrorists who want to gain  informational materials to develop weapons of mass destruction.  Iraq(ph) clearly had that capability.

SEAN HANNITY, CO-HOST:  First of all I never saw the President  this passionate or articulate or really on his game tonight.

HUGHES:  I think those who work with him, we see that every day and we  know that is how he feels about this.  Because he understands the security of our country  and all our families are at risk and I think he was able to get that...

HANNITY:  And also, he came off as real -- I think what the President  did very effectively tonight is he showed Kerry is weak, unreliable and unsteady as it  relates to the war on terror.  And a flip- flopper.  The only thing consistent about John Kerry is he is  inconsistent.  That is...

HUGHES:  And also that he has no plan.  I thought the defining moment  of the debate was when he turned to him and said, ask our allies to join us, and in a grand  diversion?  I mean, what kind of credibility would a President Kerry have in going to allies or going to  troops or going to anyone and getting them to come with us and try to help is in this fight against  the global terror network.

HANNITY:  Karen, when John Kerry says tonight it was a colossal  misjudgment; this is the same John Kerry that says, I support the fact that we disarmed him.  And he  -- he said he supported the decision to disarm him.  How does he reconcile this?

HUGHES:  I don't think he can.

HANNITY:  I know he says it affirmatively and with confidence.  But how  to you go from that position to this one and have any credibility with the American people?

HUGHES:  I don't think he can.  In fact I think he further undermined  his own credibility tonight in two sentences, one, he said, I think it was a mistake to go into  Iraq, and next he said, no, but our soldiers are dying for a mistake.  Well, you can't have it both ways.  And he  continued that pattern of trying to have it both ways.  I think he made it clear he has no plan.  I think his  plan is to maybe have some sort of international conference.  We've had lots of international conferences.    The President attends them all the time.  And an international conference was not going to remove Saddam  Hussein from power.

HANNITY:  Didn't we get the real answer yesterday, which I think was  just frankly shocking for the American people when [Good Morning America's] Diane Sawyer (search) said to John Kerry, was it worth  it? And he said it depends on the outcome.

HUGHES:  It depends on the outcome.  What kind of leadership is that?

HANNITY:  I don't know.

HUGHES:  That I guess if we win it was worth it, if we lose it maybe it  wasn't.  And I couldn't help but think, can you imagine a President Lincoln (search) standing at Gettysburg and saying it depends on the outcome...

HANNITY:  It depends on the outcome.

HUGHES:  Or Franklin Roosevelt (search) in World War II.  It depends on the  outcome.  No.  Those leaders understood you can be realistic and optimistic.  But you send a  signal to your troops, to your allies, to your enemies that we will win.

HANNITY:  Clearly, the President went in very, very prepared tonight in  this way.  I was amazed that he had John Kerry's quotes down extensively, as it relates to  Saddam, his weapons of mass destruction.

HUGHES:  That was a little hard, too, because he kept changing them.  It was hard because he had to keep changing the quotes he memorized.

HANNITY:  Do you worry how the American people will perceive these  debates?  Is that a concern, in other words, that perhaps maybe they didn't know all of John  Kerry's differing positions going in and tonight John Kerry, now 45 days out of the debate, about 10 days  ago, had settled on a position, so he settles on it confidently?  Does that concern you, that acting, or  that veneer may come off as solid?

HUGHES:  Well, I don't think so.  Because I think the American people  have to take everything he said tonight with a grain of salt because he could change his mind  tomorrow.  That is what he has done throughout the campaign.

HANNITY:  And it is your job to hammering home the different positions.

HUGHES:  Absolutely.

HANNITY:  It depends on the outcome.  I voted for the $87 billion.  I  voted against it.  He actually went after the President on the funding of armor.  And I'm like  well, he voted against the funding.

HUGHES:  He voted against the funding of armor.  Exactly.  So I think  he furthered -- somebody described him as a pretzel, that he's all twisted around himself on his  conflicting...

HANNITY:  Just like he went after the President on a war that he voted  for.  And I'm sitting there thinking, "What is that?  How do you take that position?"  Well...

HUGHES:  Exactly.

HANNITY:  So you feel good about tonight.

HUGHES:  We feel great about - I think the American people again saw  the President's real heart and passion, and I think they have no doubt that he goes to the Oval  Office every morning with one thing on his mind, and that's how can I best protect the American people?

COLMES:  Thank you very much.

HANNITY:  Good to see you, Karen, thank you.

HUGHES:  Thank you all very much for having me.

Content and Programming Copyright 2004 Fox News Network, L.L.C. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED. Transcription Copyright 2004 eMediaMillWorks, Inc. (f/k/a Federal Document Clearing House, Inc.), which takes sole responsibility for the accuracy of the transcription. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED. No license is granted to the user of this material except for the user's personal or internal use and, in such case, only one copy may be printed, nor shall user use any material for commercial purposes or in any fashion that may infringe upon Fox News Network, L.L.C.'s and eMediaMillWorks, Inc.'s copyrights or other proprietary rights or interests in the material. This is not a legal transcript for purposes of litigation.