Get Adobe Flash Player to see this content.

About This Video

Delayed Decision

Title:

Delayed Decision

Published: Sat, 14 Nov 2009

Description: How will Obama's troop decision impact Afghan strategy?

-

Automatically Generated Transcript (may not be 100% accurate)

" Administration officials now say a decision regarding US troop levels in Afghanistan is expected in early December. As the White House continues to weigh the gravity of the decision against conditions on the ground. Joining us now is lieutenant colonel Bob Maginnis and Aaron Miller a public policy fellow at the Woodrow Wilson International Center. Gentlemen thank you both for joining us Bob let me start with you but could please. A lot of discussion about whether or not we're taking the right approach here. A lot of military officials have given council that we need a certain number of troops in the region the president now seems prepared to pull back on that number your thoughts."

" saw the secondary issue and no more troops perhaps. O'Brien it depends on what you accomplish at the end state is to end this quickly get out of there and even chaos then they'll send more troops if you want to continue that the situation we have now where we're getting pretty high casualties. And you don't control most of the country. Then don't send more troops. But if in fact you wanna leave that place innate instinct that we can tolerate that's not going to. Savage Pakistan next door in the entire region and we really need to look at additional forces that are."

" They the policy decisions are are really important I mean this is -- probably one of the most important decision this -- your thoughts about it. Mean I think you have to be deliberative keeping in mind what Bob has said and the reality is and there's no -- mentality here we're in an investment for. In an angry dysfunctional region not just in Afghanistan and Pakistan with respect to Iran. And even the Arab Israeli issue. We're stuck. We can't fix these issues quickly or easily and therein lies that seems -- dilemma what our American national interest how we define. And what are the resources that we need in order to. To achieve our objectives. You organizing principle for any nation's foreign policy is the protection you home. If you can't protect your home and get -- off -- 9/11 was the second. Bloodiest day in American history exceeded only by wondering about Clemente in September at 62 so. The question then becomes what is the objective. Is it nation building in Afghanistan. Is it try to secure the internal politics of pockets Don. Or is -- trying to eliminate. True to the degree that we can Afghanistan from becoming stationary for a lot of people -- what you need to do here Bob is keep the pressure up overseas on on these terrorist organizations and and and people who would do the United States -- by keeping them marked by the overseas. You are keeping them away from Marshall."

" Well you certainly are and that's why you obviously we're. In Afghanistan helping the Pakistan needs. We have presence in Africa we have presents -- about 140 different countries so it's critical Bryant. You know if we don't want them to come to our own shores or at least have an overwhelming influence here. Then we have to find where they are over there and search and on the capture kill. And that's been our strategy from the very beginning. Parent is how much of this is being driven by the recommendations of the vice president Joe -- Making very --"

" Frankly I think this reflects two realities. Number one the president the United States both during the campaign and subsequently. Has defined. Afghanistan toward necessity. Number one he's locked himself and whatever course he -- and I suspect you'll agree on some number of troops whether it's 102030. We're crystals forty that's number one and number two by the genuinely. Difficult nature. Of the process of the problem how is he going to address the issue that's that I things -- gentlemen good discussion greatly --"

More Videos From FOX News

White House vs. Fox News

White House vs. Fox News

Karl Rove and Terry McAuliffe square off

Video|Mon, 19 Oct 2009|More from Politics
|fox news sundayfound at0:19, 6:53

the Obama White House turned up the heat on Fox News communications director and needed. -- called us quote opinion journalism masquerading as news. We wanted to ask -- about her criticism and out they've done every week since August. The White House refused to make any administration officials available to FOX News Sunday . To talk about this or anything else. So what about their strategy. Joining us are two men who worked at the highest levels of politics. Terry McAuliffe is former chair of the Democratic Party and one of Bill Clinton's closest friends. Karl Rove was a senior adviser to former president George W. Bush. Gentlemen welcome back to FOX News Sunday but it's dark but -- a clip from my interview in the Oval Office with President Obama in February. And then some
talk about Anita Dunn communications sector is leading -- like he criticized FOX News Sunday . Last week over flak -- An administration official they didn't say that -- it was wrong they just said that we had
White House Responds

White House Responds

The White House responds to the Wall Street bailout and Pakistan

Video|Sat, 20 Sep 2008|More from Politics
|Capitol Hillfound at0:37, 1:38

discussed the reaction from National Security Council spokesman Gordon John -- says President Bush . Was briefed on the attack at the Marriott in Islamabad I can tell you I've stated that hotel before. In the aftermath of nine elevenths I know a lot of western. Journalists and others stay at that hotel the president has been -- we did get a comment from John the NSC spokesman saying quote. The United States strongly condemns this terrorist attack that took place -- about Pakistan today. President Bush offers his sincere condolences to the families of all those lost in today's vicious attack. This is a reminder of the threat we all face. And basically the president's statement going on to say -- the statement from the spokesman going on to say the United States stands with the government of Pakistan at this difficult time Jamie are. Well -- hope is that all have been a -- basically that administration officials are meeting with members on Capitol Hill to try to get this nailed down immediately we know that. Plan was delivered to Capitol Hill last night and members of congress are going through right now and I asked President Bush about it. He's taken some criticism from members of his own party who don't like the idea of a 700 billion dollar
Well President Bush is defending the 700 billion dollar price tag that's on the latest and largest financial bailout since the great depression. Saying the risk in doing nothing far outweighs the risks of government intervention if you're following the markets on Friday you saw it gave quite a booms that the government. Has come into this my commandos live at the White House press in my book who we get to that. The situation in Pakistan is very serious we know that the Marriott is a hotel than Americans do stay -- we have not yet heard whether Americans were in the hotel. But is there any reaction either from the White House or Capitol Hill on what happened.
'Special Report' Online: 10/21

'Special Report' Online: 10/21

Panel on whether Obama is going to help small businesses; does the White House have an 'enemies list'?

Video|Wed, 21 Oct 2009|More from Special Report
|white house officialsfound at20:27, 22:03

Collins. He was talking to Karzai he had been in contact with. White House official Obama White House officials we've communicated. To him what their preferred policy positions where he conveyed those to Karzai. Now if you're gonna trash your predecessor in the policy makers in the policies that they came up with future -- better be careful when you use one of those policy makers. To implement your own policies and there's a lot of hypocrisy going -- at final point. Bush Administration officials here say are furious about this in ways that are really haven't seen them before even on interrogations on things. Beyond sort of Cheney world you know -- Bush Administration officials who are really unhappy about it I think we'll see in the next day or two. Just how angry are depending on
White House officials are outwardly confident. Inwardly nervous and they have every right to be inwardly nervous everyone understands. The calendar and calendars now the