Get Adobe Flash Player to see this content.

About This Video

Mission Accomplished?

Title:

Mission Accomplished?

Published: Tue, 10 Nov 2009

Description: Retired colonel on U.S. presence in Afghanistan

-

Automatically Generated Transcript (may not be 100% accurate)

" A CBS report was recently released saying that the president will soon send 40000. More troops to Afghanistan. That report was quickly denied by the White House's spokesman said quote. Reports that President Obama has made a decision about Afghanistan are absolutely false. He has not received final options for his consideration is not reviewed those options. -- his national security team and the is not made any decisions about resource is any reports to the contrary. Are completely untrue and come from on iTunes on foreign sources and quote. The White House is clearly playing politics with -- in an ever double troop deployment to the region but my next guest. Makes one of the strongest arguments I've read that our mission in Afghanistan is over and it's time to come home. Joining me now is Karen podcast -- author of a great article. Afghanistan is a success. Time to come home which you can see it Lew Rockwell dot com and elsewhere. Karen is a retired air force lieutenant colonel whose assignments have included the Pentagon. And the National Security Agency Karen welcome to freedom watch -- What was the mission in Afghanistan. That you have so persuasively argued has now been successfully accomplished."

" Well we wanted to topple the Taliban. You know we we moved Afghanistan -- operating facilities for anti American players. And dictated the market the kind of bring them into that -- essentially out of modern idea that the market. And -- I think we've done."

" And what is the danger. To the stability in the Middle East or to the security of the United States in Afghanistan that is as it exists today. If there is any danger."

" Well the danger in Afghanistan and certainly packet is. Today at that he did it in the body of the united states military that deployed open here. I'm very destabilizing force the longer we stay post it's an accomplice. That'd be on and we state them or debilitating -- party entity but the -- really in the kind of -- the ball and somewhat safe way. We -- normality. Following there they are not normal."

" What is the danger. Two American freedom if any. In Afghanistan hasn't come from the Taliban. Doesn't come from al-Qaeda and are either of them there insufficient numbers. To justify over a 100000 American troops they -- looking for them."

" They're not at all not at all it says Albanian not a suspect -- and that the Taliban. For many many years before it that we need to keep in general crystal would stated we work with them again but that it -- it we're working with them now. But the Taliban know that two American values or American. -- these are not operating from act and a in any kind of significant way if at all and I think that's been reported. By our own government."

" We just think about how odd this war is stupid the the host country is a democracy. Whose government is allied with the United States. Whose president was fraudulently elected but at least there's the appearance of a of the popular election. And yet we're being asked to introduce a 100000 troops. Into that country to do what. To help him chase out of the country people that have already left and I've already got the Pakistan another country with which were -- what kind of sense does that make."

" Well if they don't and -- but part of what my article was talking about what many people are -- I'm thinking about when -- about as an. Is the reason we were told we went there kind of the argument that look at what the inactive people and then -- fundamental. Business and military -- a complex I read it. That would -- and those recent court they'll they'll rename which is why the -- forty out an hour is why Obama didn't."

" We all know that notwithstanding what President Obama said when he was a professor at the university Chicago law school. And notwithstanding the speeches that he made when he was in the United States senate. That now as the president of the United States and commander in chief of the military forces he recognizes wars the health of the state and presidents like war. Are you surprised. But the quintessential liberal Democrat. Maybe even a socialist -- may be even farther left than the quintessential. Liberal Democrat suddenly embraces. The military industrial complex. Something he has eschewed his entire adult career until the day became president."

" You know. I would like -- be -- practical but you know yeah I'm not gonna type I I think many Obama of the border may be surprised there aren't learning them. About the nature of the state."

" The do you think he'll have difficulty. Putt on the left when and if he announces another 40000 troops I'm sure that the neo cons will applaud him and say look he's finally come around. To our side of things get bad how are those who have a general antipathy. Well whether their on the left whether there libertarians wherever they are Levin general antipathy to all war except truly defensive wars."

" Here -- I think though he'd run the risk in May I call it is he may be planning to do what LPG eight. -- that the ending it in the Vietnam War well that what we knew was made any pants and that is the buyout -- that. So that the benefit is that health care reform -- other. The next -- I consider to be socialistic. You know socialism. In America but those projects have beneficiary I have not. But that like them who may not like the war but not the other pain immediately I think you've been right and and a I have make everyone happy of course that. You know -- that."

" Colonel you might be a little too young to remember the phrase but in the LBJ years it was called guns and butter and even his most ardent advisers. Told him he couldn't afford both he couldn't afford the cost. In in money and in blood. Of a major land war and at the same time remember they Obama care as just another version of Medicaid and Medicare. Which were started under LBJ. It can President Obama. Afford this with any more ease than president Lyndon Johnson could back in the mid sixties."

" With Bartlett Bartlett. Even -- it had been growing that -- it was nothing like it is talent and the value of the dollar was. More significant what solid point stable. And it is now though we can't afford it and we can't afford that it might mean."

" What what it what do you think before I let you go what do you think we should do. If anything militarily about the threat from al-Qaeda I mean it is a bit of a conundrum. That they are in countries where the governments our friendly to us it should we introduced. Weaponry and and men and materiel there. Against the wishes of the host countries should we be bombing people from the skies using drones. That are donated 10000 miles away not in Langley Virginia or should we let the local -- with our own problems."

" We need to let the local unit and it can be spent with the American values a tick -- all of that we would be that we talk about puppet Germany where we need that we need to put that into practice. One out and until we do we're gonna have problems."

" Colonel Karen broadcast -- thanks for joining us and freedom watch it. You can catch today show on foxnews.com. Slash freedom watch and I'm serious 145 XM 160 enter online at Fox News talk dot com. At 6 PM eastern on Saturdays. From New York defending freedom. Until the next time state for America."

More Videos From FOX News

Reid Reverses Course

Reid Reverses Course

Senate majority leader gets behind Roland Burris while distancing himself from Norm Coleman

Video|Sat, 10 Jan 2009|More from Politics
|Senate majority leaderfound at0:51

blocking Blagojevich appointee Roland -- from taking his seat in the chamber senate majority leader Harry Reid reversed course. Saying there was a path forward for the former Illinois attorney general . But not so for Minnesota's incumbent senator norm Coleman after -- dubious recounts put Democrat Al franken ahead by 225. Votes Reid
Intelligence Controversy

Intelligence Controversy

What does Obama's choice for CIA chief say about his approach to the War on Terror?

Video|Sun, 11 Jan 2009|More from Politics
|White Housefound at0:33, 3:38

that you know yet enhanced interrogation written questions of rendition etc. and Barack Obama's publicly saying you know we're going to stop this now what's interesting is even as he is put Panetta there you know he recently. Asked Donald Brennan to come and be his intelligence adviser in the White House . Now Brennan was in the run and running for the CIA CIA veteran. But he got himself out because he had defended some of these policies in the past so we're seeing is very Barack Obama move here in that he's got someone advising him in the White House not a position has to be confirmed. And another that that that may hopefully be giving him good advice and then you've
citizens as well as you must form false. That was president elect Barack Obama this week promising a break from Bush Administration intelligence policies in his choice of former congressman. And Clinton White House chief of staff Leon Panetta. To lead the CIA rob lot of criticism of the the better choice based. Fundamentally on the fact that he doesn't have a lot of firsthand experience in dealing with intelligence and for the consumer -- as White House chief of staff but but not dealing. In the business of collecting and discerning and talk all things being -- I think
Firing Back

Firing Back

Cheney slams Obama's national security policies in speech at American Enterprise Institute

Video|Thu, 21 May 2009|More from Politics
|United States of Americafound at25:41

motivate the nineteen recruits who boarded those planes on September 11 2001. United States of America was a good country before nine elevenths. Just as we are today. List all the things that make -- a force for