Get Adobe Flash Player to see this content.

About This Video

The One Thing: 10/30

Title:

The One Thing: 10/30

Published: Fri, 30 Oct 2009

Description: What happens when government tries to 'fix' things?

-

Automatically Generated Transcript (may not be 100% accurate)

" Well hello America in case you missed last nights show I urge you go back online. And watch it or. You know look at it done DVR please DVR this program every day. We showed you last night very clearly the people of real influence in and around the White House who want to fundamentally transform this country into something. Revolutionary. Almost -- in nature completely different than what our founders intended. They want to turn us into a country that focuses more on spreading the wealth than actually creating it. A place where success is punished mediocrity is encouraged everybody will get a trophy. And personal freedoms are relinquished. In favor of a nanny state that just knows better than you do. I can't help but think that we are at a crossroads. Maybe the White House will call me on that statement -- get that -- wrong because I don't think we did. We're at a crossroads. We have to choose. Do you want to turn. Back towards our founders and more freedom more personal liberty and more personal responsibility and accountability. According want to continue down this reckless path where it doesn't seem. That anybody who does anything wrong actually pays for it they'll try to tell you that this is a direct -- path that. President Obama and his henchmen are actually plotting forest they'll say this health care is is -- deficit neutral. Is it like a trillion dollars. So we're spending a trillion dollars how the deficit neutral they've got to raise the money they've got to find that money someplace. The health of our country just is not good we can't afford more massive government programs. Our dollar will eventually go away if we continue down this path and when it collapses. Who is gonna save us because Americans too big -- you know. Will it be France. People will argue another stimulus you know Canada another adrenalin shot to is the answer hey that's where GDP is up now as -- stimulus. Well those stimulus shots -- is bogus. As the adrenalin shots in the movies do you remember this one from Mission Impossible three. Okay those adrenalin shots wolf this -- the system and come back for a little while but in the end it doesn't work. We -- know what happens when government tries to. Shoot an injection into the heart it fails. The real answer and the answer that nobody in Washington wants to give you is you. The individual. Government is gonna say mark my words it's the IMF for the UN. Government and even bigger government will come to the rescue when this government can no longer if."

" With me now lord Christopher among can. Former adviser to the British prime minister Margaret Thatcher and climate change expert. Also John Bolton former US ambassador to the UN and Fox News contributor. I was trying to decide it was in a meeting today and I've seen if I were on the extreme left. I wouldn't know which one of us was the most -- Is it lord -- Is -- you move from the evil emperor or is it me I just don't know. So. We want to talk a little bit about. What I have seen and video from -- lord marked -- about this this is the the framework convention on climate change explain what this is first."

" Right this is an agreement that was reached many years ago by a about a 190 countries have not signed up to it. And the idea is that we are screwing up the planet -- too much C to right and therefore. We have to do something about it. Now what is not coming up -- Kevin -- At what will be the fifteenth meeting of the -- politics of this convention 190 countries in Copenhagen from December the seventh to the eighteenth. That will be a conference at which the treaty which you now have in front to view on the desk that. Will be signed unless you -- everybody watching kind stoppage of that -- among other things says there's going to be a world government."

" Okay hang on just a second before we get into that. This is I mean it and case I mean here we get your collar read that 2000 page health care belt this one this one is only what 181 pages. It is a treaty entries some fine nations come together -- trending in LA let's sign it and what's the harm in signing it we don't have to live up to it. -- a -- John before we get into this what it. Explain how treaties work here in America."

" Well the the idea of the treaty. Is something that the United States Anders into voluntarily presumably because we think it's -- Best interest the constitution provides a lot of protection against the abuse of executive power since it's the executive that negotiates. Requiring two thirds of the Senate. To approve of a tree that's a constitutional provision it's very very important. And it's one reason why any president's ambitions including president Obama's. Run up against the wall if they trying to go too far that's one reason why the original Kyoto Protocol. Never even mated to a vote on the Senate floor right under Clinton. Right right -- yet which everybody seemed to leave out here. Does it is -- in reading this do you think there's a chance of this going through that of the S senate. Well let's be clear what we have now what you can see on web sites is a negotiating draft. And one of the reasons it's confusing is that had been in negotiation terms it's filled with brackets meaning it's filled with provisions that are in disagreement. So there's an incredible man nonsense -- this treaty and some of it's not in disagreement but there's also a lot here that has not been agreed to they've only got five weeks to go okay."

" Let me show a little bit this is lord mountain in. I think it was Minnesota. -- right. I've had so many watchdogs emailed -- this is on fire on the Internet. So here's a little bit of what he said in Minnesota. Or -- not. What -- instead. Perform and force now what exactly did you say it and Minnesota."

" I said in December. Just weeks away. -- Hagan a treaty will be signed that will for the first time create. A world government. With powers to intervene directly. In the economy and in the environmental affairs of individual nations. To -- or redistribute wealth to the tune of 2% of GDP at least. From wealthy countries like United States to poorer countries in alleged reparation for imagined and largely imaginary. Climate debt and full enforcement. On those countries who having signed don't carry on and do what they said they would sign."

" There is so much in did just that there's the climate debt thing which is unbelievable but let's start at the beginning here you have the you say there's a global government what page is a global government right you go to annex one paragraph thirteen right. And that the ambassador is rightly said there are many old tunnel is an option makes one there yes there are several -- I get with the annex is -- I'm kind ever going to be an international ago -- and I got. How does anybody know what anything means anymore that's the idea look here's the here's the thing if if you if you look at this and read it which. Of course -- half. -- EU can make the argument that is a is not a global government that they're looking at it is a a governance. Of this treaty because you're going to need frameworks to be able to monitor true or false -- there."

" Are different aspirations by different. Countries that are negotiating -- Copenhagen some wanna carry it further than others principally the Europeans. One reason this is I think going to turn out badly from their point of view as you've got countries like China and India. That have absolutely no intention of signing -- to one of the key elements here which is numerical limits on carbon emissions. Believe me India and China won exactly as lord month and says they want all the climate debt repaid they -- vast increase in foreign assistance. But they're not prepared to sign on to what what needs to happen to make this war if we sign on and others China's sun India and we're bound by it but they're not about trying all the damage being done to us but that -- photo fail. Because the the agreement tried to limit the industrial countries and gave the developing world -- pass and the US senate looked at that and said no way."

" I effect they voted 95 NATO under the presidency of the Senate -- goal to turn down any treated like kids. That exempted the Third World countries the problem is you -- is the word government that. It's not government it's government meant. And I've negotiated international treaties as ambassador as I've been kept them and -- with. -- never before have I seen the word government. Put in a treaty in this capacity with enormous they going to close done. The free market paragraph 36. All -- one. They're going to have take -- in that treat to operate in and in interference alt and control off all financial markets worldwide. Further down in another then it says a provision whereby they are going to take a tax of 2%. On every financial transaction. Into -- an annex one countries that's a country rich country like America I could take a 2% -- On financial transactions where the margins -- absolutely time. You could destroy the entire financial system of New York Wall Street of the Chicago exchange physical done. That is the powers that would be transferred to this new government entity to -- for the ambassadors. Very characteristic -- in this -- right on the night with respect ambassador I didn't think it will I think we are heading here. For what could be a global government and this was fast -- 25 years ago by some -- stronger UN bureaucrat who set top. The intergovernmental. Rather than scientific structure. Of the UN panel on climate change which is what always is about. And he said then that he hoped it would be trans modified into what became a world government yet -- of France has said the same. Al Gore talks of -- governance all the time. This is something which is being -- Everywhere you look. I now they've put the word government in the -- and they have given this body powers which I have never seen transferred before to any transnational and to fight any treaty -- okay."

" You just so much more credible -- half. Yeah it's true I. There do for now. The -- you know we have spoken on the program before you know where I think we're headed. Economically. Whether it is tomorrow or five years or eight years down the road we're headed. For. Debt in less we turn things around we're headed for debt. That leads us to a banana republic leads us to a place -- where you just can't pay for priority at a 105. Trillion dollar debt our actual you know. The non paid for. Programs that we've promised. I really believe we have a group of radicals in the White House now and in and around Washington. That are."

" Pushing for. Redistributed wealth marxism. Socialism. Global government I mean it's all there why do you think that this sounds. Not sir do you think it's I don't think it sounds nuts I think you have to to to try and and look at it incident science and I do not think we should understate the desire of many people. Many in the Obama administration and widely in New York. To move toward global governance but I don't think we should overstate what the consequences of anyone agreement are in fact it's precisely because. The pace of this change. Is hard to measure. That it's difficult to get people excited about it so by disagreeing about the potential consequences of this -- on Copenhagen I don't mean to. Ignore the risk to American sovereignty which I think it exists and it's one reason I've called President Obama the first post American president why he's so popular. In Europe. But on this draft I think that what will happen is that this certainly something will come out of Copenhagen I agree with -- Mike -- because they have to declare victory much like the president. Has to have victory on health care some bill will pass. But the more likely result given the lack of progress is that they just kicked the can down the road and we'll have these battles to fight again. What happens if -- you know this is the disagreement that I had with them."

" With Mitt Romney. I like Mitt Romney I think is an honorable man I think he's a deal maker. And when he was in Massachusetts he came up with Romney care. And he said he knows responsible we needed to have and I had to get a brokered deal with such that Citron who was responsible and I said it admit. You're not king. It's going to evolve you leave. You know under your -- maybe it might have done but you leave and now the doors open. We're opening up a door here we don't."

" Want to open. That's absolutely right and the danger all set which we've seen time and again in the negotiation of European -- by which -- democracy. Has all but gone 90% of -- rules and nominate by -- cells -- we don't connect compliment when -- two count. That made in secret and then I'll parliament is made to Paulson has no option but to deuce. We've lost our democracy through exactly this kind of carelessness where people say oh -- of course the treaty doesn't really say government it does say. Government it does transferred to this government the hockey -- done all regulate the financial market it does allow it to Levy taxes and enforcement penalties. Up to ten times. The price of a ton of -- on the international exchanges on America this country -- is targeted at America. Not one must agree that -- off but that's why I am -- not. Because. You are going to have to get on to your senators -- the White House ringing all senators go to www. Web common tree dot com. And sign up to the instrument of repudiation of -- street because if you don't make a mound knowing it's not. There is enough. In that present treated dropped if it stands on -- and it's been through several rounds of negotiation before it got that this that's not okay. If you don't stop it. And that treats he'd done by some -- go through and we've seen this time and again and European -- Pluto although never reach agreement and lost moment. They do they have an all night session that come out with that ties around that is bags under the eyes and they say. Who we've done and suddenly another slice of our freedom is don't do not relax do not take the risk that they'll constitute."

" How there's a lot to do American home daily it's a -- at his watch TV in a related matter not anymore. In a minute when we come back IA I want poke some holes in -- lost in the series and see if he can plug the moment. Prepare for the for the fifth."

More Videos From FOX News

How to Make Al Gore Proud

How to Make Al Gore Proud

Impress Al Gore with your environmentalism

Video|Fri, 2 Jan 2009|More from Latest Video
|climate crisisfound at1:22, 2:13

a catalyst for change your community by teaching others about the climate crisis and and -- candidates -- don't even capping and trading carbon emissions and to -- Yeah apology from its -- dealing with global warming . Yeah you're 18000 and -- Al Gore and sir Richard Branson -- 25 million dollars to the inventor of any device you can remove the essentially amounts of greenhouse gases from the atmosphere.
the -- the film -- inconvenient truth. Daddy daddy daddy -- climate crisis dot -- I can't I had. A carbon neutral life by reducing energy you know his arm off sending the blast in
Oscar-Worthy Performance

Oscar-Worthy Performance

Al Gore makes moving address to Congress saying taxing carbon emissions is a moral issue

Video|Fri, 24 Apr 2009|More from Latest Video
|Al Gorefound at0:13, 0:23

on sweeping energy legislation today including climate activist and former vice president Al Gore . Who gave an Oscar worthy performance going climate change a moral issue each day that we wait we increase the risk that we will leave our children and grandchildren. And irreparable -- damaged one. He compared controversial plans to tax carbon emissions to historic achievement such as the Civil Rights Act of the 1960s. And the Marshall plan of the 1940s. When asked about
subject several years ago. Chief Washington correspondent Jim Angle reports on what Al Gore had to --
Shocking Warning

Shocking Warning

Daniel Hannan says global climate change agreement would be detrimental to United States

Video|Mon, 9 Nov 2009|More from Politics
|al gorefound at9:11

real time. It's like I've really got to with the image of Al Gore getting on a private jet but Daniel good to see a thank you as always -- I based on facts and let