About This Video
Title:
Published: Tue, 20 Oct 2009
Description: Liz Cheney starts new Web site to fight 'dangerous' White House policies
Automatically Generated Transcript (may not be 100% accurate)
" So when the error of Obama lead voices of opposition reach far and wide but new group has emerged that is dedicated to showing Americans. Just how dangerous the president's week in national security policies are. Let's take a look. He talked tough and Afghanistan."
" I argued for more resource that and more troops to finish the fight. Against the terrorists who actually attacked us on nine elevenths."
" The reality. He hasn't reached a conclusion I supposed to be spending all his good time preparing for letting me in speeches. To school children living hasn't been able to focus on the war in which our soldiers in the field. Getting shot that not enough time for decision but plenty of time for."
" And keep America safe is headed by Liz Cheney she joins me now was welcome back thanks thanks for -- on."
" Thank you for having a son I do if you hard hitting."
" But as we start our program tonight very accurate it's been since August McChrystal was asked for more troops they still haven't decided. What does that mean for the troops on the ground."
" I think it's clearly as damaging to the troops on the ground I think it's damaging to morale I think it sends a very dangerous message to -- Our allies and to our adversaries out there and I think frankly you're also now asking troops to do the job without the resources they need. I think what you saw this weekend with that Rahm Emanuel and David Axelrod both saying that for some reason we now. Have to delay until. The runoff election is resolved you know I just. It's more delay and I think delays very costly and I think it's inexcusable here. Well now I did watch today the president said something important in his begin as Vietnam vets today he said he would not send troops in harm's way. Without giving them the support and resources they need so. You know I'm still hopeful that he'll do the right thing here and that he's sending a message that you know he's gonna side with the military over his political advisers want to watch NC park by."
" The laying out what the general that he appointed on the ground as saying that he needs to win this war -- says otherwise we risk failure. Is the president and the slack this indecision of his isn't putting troops lives in jeopardy."
" Yes I think there's no question and I think it's important for people to remember that the president -- made this decision once. You know he he came into office and in March this year he made the announcement that he was going to put in place a counterinsurgency strategy and send him a crystal to carry it out and then when general McChrystal came in and said you know yes sir and here's what I need to be able to prevail. The president now as has waffled and I think that there's been a concerted effort here to put pictures out of the National Security Council meetings to show that there you know having meetings and discussing the issue that they discussed it long enough it's kind -- I guess the question is if you point -- generally you he gives a recommendation. Why don't you listen to him. The less -- some type of political motivation involved in other words he's got his heart leftist base. But he's got to constantly piece you think this is a factor in this delay. You know I think there's no question I think -- clearly. You know you really have a split now it looks like between the political people who advise the president into the White House you know likes to have talk about national security policy. And you know the generals and the foreign policy people announced secretary gates coming out saying we can't wait any longer. So I think the president you know it's a very hard decision President Bush used to talk about I think every president does. That it's the hardest decision -- ever have to make to send young American men and women in harm's way. That he's the president the commander chief used to make a decision to do what what else if if you would agree is ideal in this group -- formed here is it just about national security or is it the other radical views the other radical appointments the economy. Is that going to be a part of the agenda of your group. The economy will be because I think the economy is the national security issue I mean you look at things like the one point four trillion dollar. Deficit we're gonna have now the extent to which. The -- itself threatens the value of the dollar when the have a weekend dollar you begin to worry very much about what's gonna happen with those nations that hold most of our debt the Chinese for example. I think the economic health and the robust growth of the American economy is necessary for us to have the resources we need to have a strong national defense. To continue to exercise the kind of power and authority we we need exercise around the world -- and I think that battle clearly be a set of mission we talk about arts and."
" Presidents at war with the Fox News Channel but he's not given his generals on the ground troops that they need that they say they need to win this war. Obviously -- priorities are our out of whack here now we stand back and we analyze why is the president making decisions like this."
" It seems to me that he is a pretty radical ideologue."
" He's made radical appointments he's hung out with radical people most of his political and had a career and his adult life. -- you don't if you think this president is more radical than you thought he was when he was running."
" Yes I think it -- not Disney I think that you know most Americans. Believe that the president you know when he stated that the convention in 2004 he said there's you known when that red states and Blue States for the United States. People thought there was something behind that rhetoric but I think you know it has been very radical and I would just and the fox and one of the things that really struck me was. Watching again Rahm Emanuel and David Axelrod try to get a secondary boycott going you know saying other news organizations ought to be careful. Really it looks like sending a very clear warning out there. You know it's it's clear censorship and it it's in my view abuse of power from the White House well I I think it's concerning an radical now."
" I think it's that and it says have been saying I think it's almost like they've got there enemies lists for example there's been -- talk about in congress some senators."
" Of legislative retribution. Against insurance companies because they are against the health care plan similarly there against any critic. It seems to -- it's almost like an enemies list is that a fair description."
" Well yeah I I think that what you've got in the situation where there -- a lot of folks that the president do. You know grew up playing pretty. Rough politics in Chicago for example I think that there's a level of trying to bully people I think they're also accustomed to they became accustomed to an environment where they just got a lot of adoration and they don't like to be challenged and fox -- bin you know at the top of the list of those -- hard questions -- to -- you thank you appreciate -- thanks -- I have is."
More Videos From FOX News
The White House responds to the Wall Street bailout and Pakistan
Video|Sat, 20 Sep 2008|More from Politics
|Capitol Hillfound at0:37, 1:38
How did President Obama handle Somali pirate situation?
Video|Mon, 13 Apr 2009|More from Politics
|National Security Councilfound at0:58
'Special Report' Online: 10/21
Panel on whether Obama is going to help small businesses; does the White House have an 'enemies list'?
Video|Wed, 21 Oct 2009|More from Special Report
|white house officialsfound at20:27, 22:03