Get Adobe Flash Player to see this content.

About This Video

Blame Bush?

Title:

Blame Bush?

Published: Mon, 19 Oct 2009

Description: Karl Rove responds to White House explanation for indecision in Afghanistan

-

Automatically Generated Transcript (may not be 100% accurate)

" As the administration continues its reassessment of our strategy in Afghanistan president Obama's chief of staff. -- pardon me is blaming many of the current problems. With that war on the bush White House here is some of what chief of staff Rahm Emanuel had to say over the weekend."

" When you go through all of the analysis. It's clear that basically we head into a war for eight years that was going on. That's addressed there will be the beginning -- scratch and just from the starting point after eight years. And there's not a security force and army protect -- services that are important for the Afghans to become a true partner. Fox News contributor Karl Rove was senior adviser and deputy chief of staff to President Bush I imagine you have a different view of -- what mr. Emanuel had to say about the way the Bush Administration conducted war."

" what won't -- world has he been living in the Taliban was removed from power. A constitution was written in modern constitution the first democratic elections in the history of Afghanistan Karzai government was formed. A lawyer after a Loya Jirga in which the tribal. -- agreed to join together militias were disarmed warlords were were put on the sidelines. The situation began do is improve. It was in 2007. And 2008. That the enemy -- strike back again and and you know it's really amazing and mr. Emanuel left the impression that they were the first people to ask tough questions that's simply not true. That a strategic review was begun in 2008 by the Bush Administration. In conjunction with the Obama transition team the Bush Administration did not publicly release that review but -- instead. Handed it on to the new administration President Obama. In January of this year President Obama use -- strategic review and on March 27 issued his own. Plan based upon that strategic review of the strategic review had pointed towards an expansion of the US troops. -- Obama -- 21000 additional troops to the region. And -- new conference of counterinsurgency strategy game with pointed to in the strategic review and President Obama on March was haven't announced that. General -- crystal send him an assessment on August 30. Suggesting that additional troops were necessary in order to achieve the strategic -- so that -- insurgency strategy. Which President Obama himself had adopted in a speech on March 27. It was September 30 before President Obama can get himself around to finally having his first White House meeting to discuss that assessment so you know it. -- mr. Emanuel was in congress. During the time that the Taliban was ejected from power. So he certainly knew about that -- at least congressional briefings if not the newspapers that he was in congress when these other steps were taken -- Every American saw the progress -- we made in Afghanistan this administration the new administration pres Obama's administration is not the first to deal with this --"

" So you're saying that when the president President Obama announced in March that he had done a major thorough review of Afghanistan policy. That that was essentially work that had been laid the groundwork that had been laid by the Bush Administration. Absolutely began last year there was a conference of Bucharest with NATO allies -- was a comprehensive strategic review conducted in 2008. It literally the Obama transition team. In the bush White House agreed that that report would not be issued by President Bush and his administration but instead would be handed over. So the President Obama would have time to it to look at it in adopted and that's exactly what he did on March 40 -- When he adopted comprehensive new its counterinsurgency strategy based to some degree -- what it happened in Iraq. But -- and that -- that was outlined in this in this assessment and then when he. Called for -- 21000 additional troops in Afghanistan which again was -- actually what the strategic assessment. The strategic review pointed towards the Washington Post published a photo of what's going on -- the president meets with his. War council if you wanna column that. -- basically twenty people in the room are actually three people who aren't. Who are the -- pictured in this photograph including general David Petraeus he's he's off to the left and and out of view. But when you look at this picture which the post labeled portrait in frustration. What do you see Telesis -- the significance. Well of -- it's not unusual for a war cabinet meeting to have this number of experts what caught my -- was that the president's senior adviser. David Axelrod in the president's press secretary Robert Gibbs were in this war -- meetings that is highly unusual for my experience I can't remember. Either of the Bush Administration or from my discussions with. People who conservative President Bush forty woman. There was -- that you had a political aide. In your Press Secretary in his war cabinet meetings that you know -- there's a lot. You don't want to put your Press Secretary in a place where he is. Heard information that he gets asked about. And either has to disable mislead -- all of people who press asked him about it. It's just the usual to have the president's chief political adviser sitting in war -- media you know I handled the political responsibilities inside the bush White House. And I was never had a war cabinet meeting that I thought that was -- policy well so when Rahm Emanuel is dispatched to go out on television it and and you know make the case for you know that their feelings about the Afghan war what do you think that's all about I mean that those decisions. Our I thought out well in advance he goes on television with a purpose right. Yeah I look at at I don't regret the White House and he delta chief of staff to explain where they are on the war. What gets me is it every member of the Obama high command feels obligated to begin with sacred to -- us. And misleading slap at their predecessor I mean you know is that the Bush Administration fought the war in Afghanistan to depose the Taliban. -- a lot of hard work in order to insert a constitution bring about a democracy. Take a look at what this administration's done they have destabilize the Afghan government by saying you know what we're not certain if Karzai is a good partner for us in the but the Obama administration send in James Carville. Democrat party operative in order to handle the campaign of Karzai's opponent. And then they expressed surprise when -- trying to cut side deals with the remaining warlords and regional powers and Afghanistan. In -- make sure that he has a power base -- the Americans pull the rug out from underneath him I mean. It's really unusual that this administration is so quick to criticize the Bush Administration would they are. The -- there are really destabilizing the regime in Afghanistan and a fundamental way. Karl Rove Fox News contributor and former senior vice President Bush thank you."

More Videos From FOX News

Troop Drawdown

Troop Drawdown

Bush says he will bring home 8,000 U.S. troops from Iraq, a number that is not high enough for some

Video|Tue, 9 Sep 2008|More from Special Report
|senator Obamafound at1:45

comments -- lack of understanding. In a written statement McCain said senator Obama's comments today demonstrate again his commitment to retreating from Iraq. No matter what the cost his focus is on withdrawal not on victory. Both McCain and Obama say more proof should be sent to Afghanistan. With this year it's on track to a fifth 2007. The word that the war in terms of US casualties. President Bush says a quiet surge is under way the -- US troop strength there. Not fast enough says senate majority leader Harry Reid who just returned from Afghanistan.
Staying the Course?

Staying the Course?

President Obama to reassess wars in Iraq, Afghanistan

Video|Wed, 21 Jan 2009|More from Latest Video
|Iraqi Security Forcesfound at2:05

date with -- live to be at risk and be the Iraqi Security Forces to simply wouldn't respect them. It look if there's a -- in Iraq sometime in the next couple years we certainly want the Iraqis to play the lead role epic as they have been doing I think the timeline negotiated between the US government the Iraqi Government . Makes that possible but if there are situations where the Iraqis can't handle it and that may happen from time to time. We want our forces to be able to move in to to back them up quickly and if we get everybody out. We will do do that. I apologize erupting there ya go back your original point what what does he hear specifically from Petraeus and Odierno today. Well I think look Patricia noting in a war part of the negotiations with the Iraqi Government this this timeline out by 2011 I think they'll argue. That it is reasonable the withdrawal by 2011 is reasonable but let's
Homeward Bound?

Homeward Bound?

Questions about whether troops withdrawn from Iraq should go to another location instead of back to the U.S.

Video|Fri, 5 Sep 2008|More from Special Report
|General Petraeusfound at0:40

troop reductions in Iraq next week a senior military officials familiar with General David Petraeus his recommendations to the president. Says Petraeus has suggested that between 7500 to 8000 US troops be withdrawn from Iraq between now and mid January. 1 army brigade combat team about 4000 troops will not be replaced in mid January. Fox News has learned the reduction will also include 1100 Marines in a marine battalion and a marine aviation squadron which will return this fall. The rest of the forces would be taken from combat support units. They -- General Petraeus -- recommendation. And ran onto the chain of command and then they presented to the president he's obviously talking to his national