Get Adobe Flash Player to see this content.

About This Video

Jerome Corsi

Title:

Jerome Corsi

Published: Tue, 13 Oct 2009

Description: Part 2 of exclusive look at 'America for Sale'

-

Automatically Generated Transcript (may not be 100% accurate)

" you know the author of the brand new book America for sale doctor drove accorsi. Are you -- name names in this book yes you give the names of people that you -- putting America up for sale. And a name that all our audiences familiar with we -- often especially -- presidential election years. This guy by the name of George Soros yes and I also cite the writings. So George Soros says we have an international economy what we need now is international governance systems. To control the international economy in other words the UN the World Bank the I am -- To the detriment of American sovereignty. Because with George Soros thinks it nation -- like when the kings had cats when you say at that would mean that we the people the United States constitution. Would be circumvented. At the altar of -- this one world what one world government one world secondary we would we would be our sovereignty would be subject. To the dictates of the World Trade Organization. The World Bank the International Monetary Fund the UN in Soros is view we've -- international economy. So the international governance organization should set the rules is that they ended in he has said this you've gone through a -- site is right and there's an I -- in the book and in America for sale I quote page by page out of Soros is writings. Where he says things like. Nation states like the United States -- should be what it. King said -- is just -- the question how does somebody like that of a multi billionaire. Have the power to impact so much in terms of our electoral process well with his billions he thinks he can buy a votes and he always is gone I mean he Betty bet against the pound -- Sallie -- original money. Now he's betting against the dollar he doesn't want US sovereignty or US economic strength to be predominant. -- you get this global vision which dictates. His backing of Barack Obama but you know look at all the groups that he's formed and -- all the groups -- all these democratic groups also many of which to attack me personally absolutely. Or any opponent and me. Well I don't any opponent of the president or any opponent of the -- and a quarter of US sovereignty than anyone who wants there to be as strong US economy. Who cares about the US worker who cares about the ninth and tenth amendment a limited government. George Soros singles out and wants to attack right so he's number one -- terms of who you blame yes the second. A group that you blame is the Obama administration itself yes because -- on this -- is gone along with this globalism if you just take a look. At the last G -- meetings in London in April and just recently in Pittsburgh. Agreements have been signed that undermine the dollar. We're putting money into the International Monetary Fund to create these special drawing rights and the plan according to China. Is that this will replace the special drawing rights will replace the US dollar. As this as a standard for foreign exchange do you really believe that Americans would tolerate American giving up its sovereignty. Well that's the whole administration Rahm Emanuel even Hillary Clinton says don't let a crisis go to waste. So crisis in which we. Have essential in the book -- 65. Trillion with a T. Unfunded liability. Money that we're gonna have to pay out in Social Security Medicare Medicaid there's no way that. I don't useful -- facts but -- do you really believe that they in their mind. Want America. To cease to exist because when you say gives up its sovereignty America as we know -- ceased to exist when -- show is President Obama is post American. He believes in this in -- nationalism. Just listen to his speeches when he went to Cairo and reach out to the Muslim world listened to speeches at the United Nations. It's no longer -- be. -- American exceptional -- he does we're able to answer was -- allies of the -- thing you know this great -- wells and etc. so we know that the United States where is the shining city on the hill where as the defense of the US middle class -- this -- these just socialist policies or these policies that really wouldn't really surrender American sovereignty really surrender American -- the united document that with the economics in America for sale. Why go through George Soros is writings they knew present -- right things well double let's go to Brzezinski you for saying he was Jimmy Carter's. What -- national security policy officials say about exactly and it he recently was quoted as talking about that at the Israelis deem it necessary to take out Iranian nuclear facilities to -- as Israeli planes out of here. How is he on the list of the people that you believable because Rusedski is advocated again that the United States and as a superpower. Should not be dominated world affairs we should -- international organizations like the United Nations. Even determined international foreign policy. Tell the White House what they -- can't do where the president should first go to check with the Security Council I mean his Barack Obama chairing the Security Council. Insignia presents he would have the Security Council determine what. The president could or could not do. In foreign affairs including Afghanistan or Iran or any other frightening how it is prohibited -- that reminds me just that week foreign policy Jimmy Carter well. I get Jimmy Carter to worse you know -- I would argue -- Barack Obama is much more concerned with what the world opinion is -- they should be concerned. With the people who are losing their homes and their jobs the American middle class. And that's why I'm calling in America for sale for the rise of 21 century American patriots are you've got this last because Columbia University. Joseph Stiglitz -- And see -- again as a good example because is an economist. That he says -- globalism is fine we said international trade to the detriment of the United States but. We should have the under developed countries be more represented. And US wealth should be transferred underdeveloped country with a pay -- their healthcare -- and Barack Obama and Pittsburgh signed agreements again with the International Monetary Fund is gonna allow greater governor -- for China. And the underdeveloped countries. This again most Americans aren't aware but these technical agreements. The come out of the international meetings often compromise US sovereignty its kinda chilling what you're saying. You don't really paying a very optimistic picture that I am I am optimistic -- the book ends very strongly because you think people rise up again I think people will oppose it I think. What's going to happen has happened the tea parties the town halls. Middle Americans are saying no to a global new deal on that's what that's what America for sells all about. How you can organize your life to survive economic hard times. Pay off debt make sure you get your primary residential real estate consolidate. Families and then go back to the fundamental principles of the constitution. The ninth and tenth amendments limited governments and just say. No -- international trade is fine. Do we need to be -- and -- national environment. But not to the detriment of US sovereignty or giving up on this country doctor Corzine. I have no doubt you'd be attacked first thing in the morning now certainly that well we'll tell it's a provocative -- book and I gotta tell you I think it's a warning. For a lot of people. In many ways we're heading in the wrong direction and there's a lot at -- so called action and it's a great honor to begin with the usual -- I thank you very harsh."

More Videos From FOX News

International Community

International Community

Should the U.S. let the United Nations handle North Korea?

Video|Mon, 6 Apr 2009|More from Latest Video
|North Koreafound at0:08, 1:09, 2:44, 4:03

international law by launching a long range missile. The Pentagon fears that North Korea on the launch pad here that North Korea is trying to develop. -- missile that can reach the United States this is a mock up now of the missile that
a long term pattern there's been years and years of talk with North Korea . Bilateral multi lateral -- series and in UN Security Council resolutions. I think what we can take from this recent test is that continuing six party talks continuing UN Security Council resolutions is going to continue to. To provide North Korea at the time it wants to develop more robust capabilities. I think -- I think it's really gotten their attention in recent
House is saying now they need a clear and strong response the United Nations . I don't that's going to happen but we're back in that same slot three years ago in 2006. It is the United States the only country that cares. That North Korea's exporting its missile technology to places like Libby in the past and perhaps Iran today.
ability to deliver them. It's a nightmare scenario with a country like North Korea with a proven track record of sales to dangerous regions and actors around the world. So to me I think Americans understandably would have some security concerns about what they see happening in our parent. I'll only option to go talk more in New York can't make anyone feel more secure. The same time there's a debate about missile defense. And this strikes me that what North Korea has done is once again reminded everyone this absolutely the wrong time to walk away from missile defense capability. I think it
Handling Iran

Handling Iran

Karl Rove on what Obama must do about Iran

Video|Fri, 25 Sep 2009|More from Latest Video
|united nations security councilfound at0:36

to be a meeting between the Iranians and the permanent members the united nations Security Council plus Germany. We have United States . Britain and France. Being very tough -- on the need for action sanctions we've got the Russians didn't really Mel's saying. Well
After the Show Show: 5/27

After the Show Show: 5/27

'Special Report' panel on GM's future, North Korea

Video|Wed, 27 May 2009|More from Special Report
|North Koreafound at0:24, 2:37, 4:01, 5:55, 7:05

General Motors. Bankruptcies currently winning. What should the US do about North Korea is one that just popped up. Isolation 88%. And also we have the issue of -- might or will she win confirmation easily be tough. -- past votes that you can weigh in on. And we have comments. I will not buy a new car from any government says bill in Connecticut thanks bill. We start though with North Korea and let's bring in our panel gives them Steve Hayes senior writer for the weekly standard AB Stoddard associate editor of the hill and syndicated columnist Charles Krauthammer. North Korea . Obviously has launched a series of missiles at least five that we know over the past few days at an underground nuclear test. And now we are waiting to see what comes out of the UN Security Council if anything. First let's check in with the Pentagon national security correspondent Jennifer Griffin. Jennifer what do they stand there at the Pentagon this whole North Korea situation.
have contingency plans for everything. And they obviously have a plan for North Korea but even behind the scenes when you walk through that nineteen and a half miles a quarter were there. What what are
of caution those ships have been launched by the navy's South Korea's a move is not moving troops around. So you that you're hearing a lot of hot rhetoric but. I would say in the hallways here that they are down -- that being said I did get one piece of information at the end of the day. Would suggesting that the latest Intel is seeing some steam rising from the young beyond nuclear plant it's not clear what that -- is they're analyzing it. But it could suggest you know activity starting. And the potential re processing starting. At that young -- that in North Korea .
over several days of sort of laughing a little bits and treating North Korea like a grumpy child is is while we know they are working. Feverishly behind the scenes to extract more pressure from particularly
Scott says why is the UN doing nothing about North Korea it you know Steve we've seen this this and a packed full -- Many times we've we spend this plane before I
they -- while. I think you know in some ways hurting North Korea's economic. Standing. You know I haven't strangled. The regime there. And I and I and I agree with Indian Nat -- Troubled by the administration's response to this both booked for school respected to Jennifer important what people are saying inside the Pentagon. -- that the administration was looking at North Korea before that you were call it Stephen Bosworth who was the special envoy. In into North Korean matters the world to the six party talks. So that he was relatively relaxed. About this he said that just within the past couple of weeks. I'm not relaxed just because North Korea has a crazy man running the country. Doesn't mean that we can afford to treated as a second or third order threat I mean this -- is ongoing but all. Signs are pointing that this was actually nuclear bomb that detonated under the ground here in North Korea and -- embezzlement and now it's it's a third the size of Hiroshima. That's a serious nuclear explosion yeah it was I'm not last -- some people said well -- in October of 2006 and some people said. Well wasn't real task and it wasn't really successful we don't need to be alarmed about it this one I think we do need to be alarmed about it. You also have if that case since the market mentioned much the other media coverage this. Yeah it is a fact. That North Korea is a serial proliferate here and they're not proliferating too you know Britain or they're not -- proliferating countries that are friendly the United States. It is that North Korea was caught red handed sending at least nuclear technology. The know how perhaps the personnel. To Syria. A state sponsor of terror I mean this is a big deal. And you even have chosen us secretary of state Hillary Clinton raising and hearing that it wasn't confirmed that North Korea was in fact a nuclear power. It's just interesting dynamic here I have a question for you Charleston Ohio what about Japan's
our senior White House correspondent Major Garrett and major we're talking about North Korea and the new administration's response. What's your sense behind the scenes there of how things are are going this.
tantrum it's a way to get attention. That's not going to advance North Korea's interest as if the north Koreans have broad interest that it's seeking to achieve with the international community there's no evidence of that hasn't been for more than a decade. North Korea is isolated there's almost no level of economic sanctions that haven't been applied and there's no record or evidence to believe they've
on the online show thanks everybody for the comments we finished up North Korea isolation is the best policy 89%. GM bankruptcy and then fell 67%. So my -- wins easily. Don't forget to visit our