Get Adobe Flash Player to see this content.

About This Video

'We're Disappointed'

Title:

'We're Disappointed'

Published: Fri, 2 Oct 2009

Description: White House senior adviser David Axelrod responds to Chicago losing 2016 Olympic bid

-

Automatically Generated Transcript (may not be 100% accurate)

" Our Chicago was eliminated in the very first round even after the president and mrs. Obama -- company -- to make their pitches for their hometown. It's also the hometown of White House senior adviser David Axelrod he's on the north -- to join us David good to be it -- to be to be here. What happens to be and why did Chicago go and why so quickly."

" Well look I don't I don't pretend to be an expert on the politics of the -- OC obviously. The Madrid's bid was led by a former president of the IOC I'm sure those relationships. Were valuable in this process but. There was never any guarantee all the bids were strong we knew that. This president was proud to go and represent our country and make the case for the US and make the case for Chicago we do it again. If he had the chance we're disappointed it didn't work out but. Life goes off."

" Do you think there was pushed back among some of these IOC members saying hey you know what you can't bring your celebrities like your President Obama on your Oprah Winfrey and here and tell us how to vote."

" No -- I really don't think that and we -- other plenty of examples in the past. Tony Blair. Came in at the end and one -- London in the past so there's a tradition of this. I just think that there's been intensive lobbying going on for a very long time. There are relationships and politics within the committee. That -- formidable and -- window we just couldn't. Overcome that but it was certainly well worth the effort I think everyone there agreed that the president and the First Lady made wonderful presentations ones. That both. The American people and the people in Chicago could be proud -- and you know they just decided to go another way."

" David -- envisioning the headlines from your critics this afternoon and tomorrow morning this is a review of the president by the international community this indicates decline of American influence your reaction."

" I don't think anybody who. Was at the UN last week or at the G-20 where the president was. Clearly a very strong presence in the very strong leader would just suggest that I don't think if you speak to -- the leaders throughout the world. That they would say that the IOC as -- said has its own politics that transcend these things and we simply couldn't overcome them but you know. -- critics are part of this business and critics will say what they well if the president hadn't gone. They would have said he should have gone. And that's just the nature of the business if you can't live without that you shouldn't be here."

" Yes it is possible they -- said that if he had not gone and -- still lost out. Another question for you David though the issue probably know your critics have been saying the only reason he sat down with general crystal to talk about Afghanistan while he was on the ground in company Hagan and they did that aboard Air Force One. With that he needed a justification for this -- wasn't just going to pitch for them."

" I don't think he had and he didn't need any justification for the troops personally left at 7 o'clock last night. He'll be back here by mid afternoon this wasn't a huge investment of time it was an investment of sleep. That he gave up but it was well worth that he met with general -- crystal because general -- was in London. He was in -- it was easy for them to get together more in the midst of a of a discussion about next steps in Afghanistan so it made sense for them to get together did."

" That's right White House senior adviser joining us from from from the north lawn of the White House David thanks for your time."

More Videos From FOX News

The Inside Story

The Inside Story

From Hillary to Rev. Wright to Palin, campaign manager David Plouffe recalls Obama's road to the White House

Video|Tue, 10 Nov 2009|More from Politics
|senator obama'sfound at6:03, 26:49

You might remember that the Clinton New Hampshire chair certain things about. Senator Obama's admitted past drug use -- as a teenager and you know they released him but they had a discussion about the tone
powerful. You know response to a lot of the arguments made against senator Obama's candidacy a powerful affirmation. Of course the -- so powerful as he wrote himself.
Spam a Lot?

Spam a Lot?

FOX News exclusive: White House hired company to mass-deliver e-mails

Video|Mon, 24 Aug 2009|More from Latest Video
|white housefound at0:03, 1:04, 1:46, 2:01, 5:05

Is not to have people who have not was requested information the White House to be receiving unsolicited spam emails -- the potential for abuse is there. I think that we have to have the White House itself internally look at its own standards and procedures to make sure like the house that they are doing the things that they. Could be perceived as politicizing an issue and emanating that is emanating from the White House in terms of the submission of emails people -- unsolicited.
While Fox News exclusive now on those White House emails so many Americans received but never requested. The White House shedding some more light on how you may have gotten spam by David Axelrod. Confirming to Fox News that the White House hired a private communications company to distribute the emails on mosques. Giving back group lists of names and email addresses. And now
governance mode. And when you've seen things set up to to the White House and its site where you can report third parties or other portable misinformation. To the White House itself. And then you see the White House again because of a political intent. Going so far to start spamming people not requested it. You can start to see the
is this sends out emails as a matter of course for the White House and from any other government groups. So there's nothing untoward about it and it -- why would there be an issue with
Garrett has received unsolicited email regarding this health care issue from the White House . And you may have said in the past something about the health care plan that you thought maybe somebody didn't light. You would not know where -- you've been report of the White House site is putting forward this information or not and here comes from the White House . An unsolicited spam type of email to you. The overall effect of what we're staring at us not simply the company that's
that we knew before that we knew we found out that the White House had the email addresses of folks who had never asked to -- email list. This is a new wrinkle in it because we find at the White House is used -- third party firm has got delivery. To send out the emails and -- got delivery doesn't work for free it requires a paycheck. And we -- we assume that the White House has delivered one and win the question is. Way to get that money is that taxpayer money and is there anything wrong with that other -- has the White House it's one thing at the White House and -- now read about. Hurricane dollar order -- sort of alert from FEMA are some. Federal government agency which they had
These -- unsolicited emails as opposed to say someone writing into the white house on health care with an issue and then getting a response or an emergency notification that comes through. So again what you're seeing is whereas we in the house have a franking commission we have to go through to ensure there's not a political content to information that we send out to people who have. Either written knots or sought other up.
spicy you can White House is out there you've got a house got a body that's that make sure you'll do this that make sure -- in
Right that's I think the White House and its strict guidelines adopted for itself their separate -- branch of government clearly they -- use the house -- commission. But to prevent political content from going in that the key nature what you're talking about -- is the fact that these -- unsolicited emails going out to people who may or may not have any idea as to why they're receiving them from the White House itself.
Well how do you stop that -- the White House . -- you know I -- this way outside that they think maybe they're just new with this you know maybe they don't know that you shouldn't use got delivery to send out emails from David Axelrod as opposed to. You know legitimate White House communications on matters of national importance. It is is -- could that be an innocent mistake or is there -- that this isn't a mistake at all and they're entitled to use got -- delivery and taxpayer dollars if if that's what's involved. For whatever they -- whatever message they want to deliver to us.
Letting Loose

Letting Loose

Obama yuks it up at White House Correspondents' Dinner

Video|Mon, 11 May 2009|More from Politics
|John Boehnerfound at10:36

the next hundred years old learned to go off a prompter and Joe Biden will learn to stay on the problem. In the next hundred days are. Bipartisan outrage will be so successful that even. John Boehner welcome senator becoming a Democrat. After all we have a lot in common. Is -- person of color.