Get Adobe Flash Player to see this content.

About This Video

'New Era of Engagement'

Title:

'New Era of Engagement'

Published: Sat, 26 Sep 2009

Description: Grading Obama's U.N. debut, administration's actions on world stage

-

Automatically Generated Transcript (may not be 100% accurate)

" Because the time has come. For the world to move in a new direction. We must embrace a new era of engagement based on mutual interest. And mutual respect and our war must begin now. President Obama calling for a new era of engagement in his debut speech before the United Nations this week aren't -- what is an era."

" An engagement means in practical terms what does the president trying to do. Michael Jackson has but we are the world lives. It's on this is the end of the Euro -- American exceptional listen at least in the view in the view of this. Of this. President that's a view that America has a cousin that did -- signing shining city on -- hill the American global leadership. Who's really done -- enforce its post World War II by both presidents of both parties what war that's right and the question is who exactly are you engaging web. -- engaging with our allies in Europe or our allies and in -- for common security interest common values. By all means that's put -- of the presidents of both parties have done for a long time. But how then are you going to Bennett the engagement Kim -- not without Ahmadinejad serial -- deal breakers who want to live outside of this world of engagement. There's also a world conference there's also a world of confrontation and that's what this this president's speech. Still wrestling with I guess you would argue that look we're gonna get new sanctions were going to be able to organize will be tougher on these recalcitrant like Iraq are like Iran and North Korea when they. When they don't abide by international rules that seems to be -- what what what he's saying. If they don't sign up to new treaties if they -- abide by the treaties will be tough on."

" Yup that's what he's saying -- but the point is I think to pick up -- points. Beyond that there's always the possibility and northern has been a military action and that's where they don't wanna go there for in this speech the president talk. Repeatedly. About his commitment to the United Nations system and -- what. He's doing here is taking United States out of a leadership role in enveloping it within the United Nations system where you have a kind of collective effort to solve these problems which basically solve your political problem and take you off the military book for a."

" and talk about lack of sanctions what -- president Obama's reaction to it to the fact that Iran has a second suits and -- with secret nuclear site. Friday morning gets up in Pittsburgh and he reiterates he ran right to have peaceful nuclear power its right to. That's amazing to me why does Iran have a right to it -- have a responsibility they've behaved."

" Otherwise yet it's really interesting listening to the speech -- I didn't quite get this from the president's. Campaign when he as a candidate but. He really does believe that nuclear disarmament is going to be one of the major goals of his administration he thinks he can get this global arms control regime. And that we can reduce our own stockpiles enormously and get pretty close to an -- were very few people have nuclear weapons or we all just having."

" And right that trust but verify his. I think basically what he's trying to say is that he can make friends with a lot of the world's tyrants and convince them. That really the path they'd been on for the last twenty years this is not a good idea. And you know there's a question about what it costs to be friends with all these these these tyrants and I think the example in Honduras right now. You know he's sort of saying to. Lula Chavez you know what. What I can get along with you. And here's my trade you can -- he's the Venezuelan dictator yes you can have Honduras sand and not you know why -- a better relationship than you had with George Bush. "

" liberals from Brett the president the White House is now saying look we've got to break through here. The Russians have come on round on Iraq Medvedev said this week president of Russia that he was sent and is now favorable to sanctions and look this is the payoff from the fact that we gave up those what would method of did Paul was that the defense is no civil offenses in an eastern here short Medvedev cleared his throat and this administration is acting as if this is. An -- an extraordinary breakthrough but the word some things here. Is that the time for effective sanctions on Iran is clearly. Or very nearly passed so we're talking about sanctions would be only thing that's gonna stop Iran. As they get this much closer to the goal line ports which they've been working for were put -- more than. More than twenty years is probably going to be if not military action in the threat of military action. And the three meters. Sarkozy of France Gordon Brown president and an Obama and in in -- press conference yesterday. Made it clear crystal crisp clear that military action is nowhere near. Being considered. One quick question Mary the president also announced that the solar B the G-8 group of nations meeting any custody of the G-20. And they're going basically -- peer review of economic."

" Policies yet another sign that he thinks that the problem in the world is that we haven't brought enough people to the table to discuss and -- our collective fashion. You know what what -- we should go on this very worrying worrying worrisome for. Those of us who believe American leadership is important all right Mary thank you."

More Videos From FOX News

The Journal Editorial Report: 9/26

The Journal Editorial Report: 9/26

Why is Obama wavering on Afghanistan?

Video|Sat, 26 Sep 2009|More from Latest Video
|suicide bombersfound at2:45

line then is that the Americans are bogged down in Afghanistan. With suicide bombers putting American bodies on the front page of the paper every day. This administration is going to blank that's --
McCain's Take

McCain's Take

Arizona senator weighs in on Sotomayor pick, North Korea threat

Video|Wed, 27 May 2009|More from Politics
|North Koreafound at1:11, 6:22, 7:42, 8:33

I won't want to move on to North Korea because we have a pretty serious situation unfolding there with the missiles being fired. With the nuclear test that has not taken place and it was Peter brooks is -- in the New York proposed that. In the four months Barack Obama has been in office he has been challenged more by Kim Jung Il and North Korea than George Bush was in eight years. His first Obama's response the president's response is that we've we've got to get tough.
rages not a Washington a very serious crisis continues to develop. In North Korea now just days after North Korea detonated. A nuclear device whose power was on par with that. That all of the -- atomic bomb. There are reports that
taking place and there are thousands. I believe 30000 American troops in South Korea . The north Koreans have the capability of sending soul on fire because there are. Artillery emplacements. That can -- on the other side into North Korea this is of the utmost seriousness we should act unilaterally and urged. The United Nations staff acted as twelve and also with
Acting. Well we should reinstate North Korea they states that sponsor terror list we should freeze their financial assets wherever we can. We should work with the Japanese to prevent transfer of funds to North Korea . I talked about the Chinese. And by the way the prime minister of Israel does not share. The presence rather optimistic view about the Iranians and nuclear weapons .
After the Show: 4/8

After the Show: 4/8

Web exclusive footage of Bret Baier with the all-star panel and crew of 'Special Report'

Video|Wed, 8 Apr 2009|More from Special Report
|North Koreafound at7:22, 10:42, 11:28, 12:06, 13:05

then of course that would surprise no longtime observer of the UN Security Council . What I'm told is that in the official public statements China and Russia. And even Iran of course we're taking the view that this was a legitimate will launch of the satellite by North Korea . What I've learned from US officials today is that in the private behind the scenes talks no one is maintaining that -- any kind of straight face they all know that this was a cover for ballistic missile launch. We should point out. Brett that experts who have observed this launch are telling us that they expect more missile launches from North Korea . Possibly in the next ninety days and that we should all be careful about. Terming this a failure but not only does this go twice as far as previous. Missile launches by North Korea . But it actually contrary to what some have been saying including US Northern Command. The three stage rocket actually may have gotten into its third stage before things fell apart so this was. -- quite an advance over previous tests and we should expect to see more tests from North Korea sooner rather than later.
your poll which is what should the US do in response to North Korea's missile launch. And we've seen the administration talked about a response that was going to happen. And going to happen quickly there
to get China and Russia to sign on to issuing by the Security Council . A formal resolution condemning this rocket launch by North Korea . What the Chinese the Russians one is to issue a kind of a less forceful document it's called a statement it really
lot of the comments were getting Candace says inaction at the UN Security Council what a shocker of waiting grave. How dangerous is that that the US is cutting defense as well as taking no action -- North Korea Iran and China a lot of comments about that. James you in your interview with ambassador rise. She said something that I've
Charles the question here. We have is from Alex how close is North Korea's missile program to anything impressive he just heard James say that it may have gotten too. That third stage then going rhetoric is -- come on North Korea is not a threat why should we worry about. Well it's a matter of the progress it's making we don't know if
a presidential statement which is the weakest of all. -- the UN Security Council was able to do. It shows that our trip abroad are built Obama in Europe on this abject apology Elvis listening. Well this America is no longer going to dictate or be dominant. Is being received well around the world and we are not dictating and dominating anybody. And as a result even at the UN we're getting nothing. Jim should we be putting like a clock up. For how long this takes to get anything out of the UN Security Council and whether that says something about the administration's poll. With member nations I don't think so if you listen to the conversation here and and look at the history of dealing with North Korea whatever comes out of Security Council and it doesn't seem like it's -- matter whatsoever to do a darn thing to her. And North Korea as long as you have China and Russia living and be resistant to doing these things and I think Charles.
talking look at -- fallen into the weapons yet you know if North Korea doing this testing and I don't think this is an. That could -- I agree with chiles and that the fact they
Yes Sharon says North Korea just wants attention. Number of questions about Japan's reaction and here's one. That says. What do you think from -- what do you think the Obama administration's threshold for any military action is in North Korea -- zero. -- I think it's I think that he would be a great synagogue or aggression against the south of me
ought to be sanctions in this case and you know I don't. North Korea has been a problem for everybody was a problem for Bill Clinton is a problem for George Bush it's not going to be a problem for Obama. I think that that that that this whole missile situation. Calls for our world robust. Development of anti missile and anti missile system. Instead of the instead of doing that the administration is pulling back from -- missiles. It's not only North Korea that's got that's kind of missile. In in February. Or Iran launched a satellite which means that Iran has tonight's CBM it's it's called a soft peer to. And so if they've got they've got the missiles North Korea's got the bomb. North Korea doesn't have the missiles yet. Iran's got the bomb there is this is gonna develop a bomb what we need is an
mentioned and that is at a time when these rogue regimes like North Korea and Iran are developing not just the missiles. Two big they've reached our allies or perhaps ourselves but the nuclear warheads to
Clinton recently and on that trip. She had some comments about whether North Korea really does have. A nuclear weapon I -- they're going bad is -- they have multiple weapons but she talked about that publicly. But what what is that did that for my secretary Clinton about. The nuclear program in North Korea . Well top US intelligence officials -- have testified publicly that they believe that. On North Korea that this was a couple of years ago when George Tenet was director of CIA testified publicly. The North Korea was believed to have two to three nuclear weapons that arsenal is presumed to have grown over the because this administration backing
there's no discussion of dispute about that. And about the fact that North Korea has an arsenal of nuclear weapons based on plutonium that's been reprocessed. The question that is still disputed is whether or not
negotiate our support for Taiwan. As incentive for China to help with North Korea China is really the linchpin here Charles and everybody here.
we did last week on line we just I would focus. -- North Korea and Somalia and and some of these issues.