Get Adobe Flash Player to see this content.

About This Video

Illegal Appointments?

Title:

Illegal Appointments?

Published: Tue, 8 Sep 2009

Description: Are Obama's 'czars' unconstitutional? Judge Napolitano responds

-

Automatically Generated Transcript (may not be 100% accurate)

" What we've been reporting on the president's czar is these are special advisers who have the president's -- on specific issues like Wall Street bonuses. Border security cyber space and with Sunday's resignation of the controversial green jobs czar Dan Jones is his name. Over his past comments and associations with some questionable groups there is now a microscope over some of the people who are closest to the president. All told there are 33. Current czar is. They are not required to fill -- the exhaustive questionnaires at the White House requires every cabinet level secretary and deputy secretary position. They can even be hired without an FBI background check -- Supreme Court confirmation or congressional confirmation. Still not clear what most of these advisers are getting paid to do are getting paid for how much they're making and there are still four is our jobs that are open. Including bizarre for cyber security which I mentioned so are all of these advisors actually legal joining us now is judge and content out. Who is a Fox News senior judicial analyst good to see just 33 -- For more to go companies ours does it take to screw delightful but it is that the problem here that there is so many of them -- well."

" And it's as many as the Obama administration wants under current law I mean technically these -- Our presidential advisers he can ask their advice and they can give them their advice and he can put them on the federal payroll but. If he for example asks them to do things that should be done by other federal officials whose work must be transparent or whose work is accountable to the congress. Like -- cabinet secretary. That would violate the constitution and violating federal law. If he has them doing things in his own -- That would violate the constitution and violating federal law so what do you think we need to do about this week we need to change the law. And it is that would need to be done -- congress I -- this democratic congress they're not gonna changing laws and I don't know upset the president anyway when it comes to his ars in the what was actually changed in the Bush Administration Rick which. Authorize the president. To give top secret security clearance -- to allow anybody to look at documents that he wanted to prior to president George W. Bush. You couldn't have that kind of access to secrecy. Unless you had been investigated by the FBI and confirmed by the Senate. So by the congress giving that power to President Bush -- at thirteen czarist. President Obama has taken that same -- and given himself. 33 and I think you even said thirty -- ours but it really depends upon what they do somehow some way we need to find out. If these people are just giving the president advice which would be lawful even if -- advice on things that the constitution. Doesn't say the federal government has authority over. But if they are acting in the president's name or they are doing things under the law that only cabinet secretaries should do. Then the court sent the -- step in and stop them."

" But what is -- is really do in the end I mean you know they they don't have any budgetary power is -- a lot of people say they don't really have a lot of teams. As far as their portfolios are concerned. We know we make it a lot about nothing here and -- me about the president has czar is just because a lot of people are upset with the president. And and do what they feel he's imposing on the country know."

" I don't think we're making it the great question I don't think we're making a lot out of nothing and I'll give you an example. But TARP legislation gives great leeway. Do the secretary of the treasury as to how he wants to spend you know the number it's astronomical. 700 billion dollars not all of which has been spent. So who's whispering in his ears. But certain stars the particulars. -- that -- sent -- secretary Geithner is here. It's a former executive with the United Auto Workers so. Is there any reason to wonder why. That GM bankruptcy and the Chrysler bankruptcy were so favorable to the UAW. -- there was federal money involved in both. Which came from the secretary of the treasury we know who was whispering into his -- Now that whispering. Is lawful but if the west."

" becomes I'm gonna bypass the secretary and do this on my own. Then we have a serious problem with federal law being violent and see that a tough thing to prove you be if you'd be able that. You're not gonna get to make these guys don't you -- you can't subpoena as -- how do you do you find out what they're doing well the only way you could subpoena -- to subpoena -- czar of which we now have one. Who is you know resigned and under cover of darkness over the weekend yeah I don't like Ben Jones is gonna. Be invited to Capitol Hill anytime soon it would be like pulling teeth I judge -- a Fontana thanks so much always good to talk to you my friend finally come back."

More Videos From FOX News

White House Responds

White House Responds

The White House responds to the Wall Street bailout and Pakistan

Video|Sat, 20 Sep 2008|More from Latest Video
|Capitol Hillfound at0:37, 1:38

discussed the reaction from National Security Council spokesman Gordon John -- says President Bush . Was briefed on the attack at the Marriott in Islamabad I can tell you I've stated that hotel before. In the aftermath of nine elevenths I know a lot of western. Journalists and others stay at that hotel the president has been -- we did get a comment from John the NSC spokesman saying quote. The United States strongly condemns this terrorist attack that took place -- about Pakistan today. President Bush offers his sincere condolences to the families of all those lost in today's vicious attack. This is a reminder of the threat we all face. And basically the president's statement going on to say -- the statement from the spokesman going on to say the United States stands with the government of Pakistan at this difficult time Jamie are. Well -- hope is that all have been a -- basically that administration officials are meeting with members on Capitol Hill to try to get this nailed down immediately we know that. Plan was delivered to Capitol Hill last night and members of congress are going through right now and I asked President Bush about it. He's taken some criticism from members of his own party who don't like the idea of a 700 billion dollar
Well President Bush is defending the 700 billion dollar price tag that's on the latest and largest financial bailout since the great depression. Saying the risk in doing nothing far outweighs the risks of government intervention if you're following the markets on Friday you saw it gave quite a booms that the government. Has come into this my commandos live at the White House press in my book who we get to that. The situation in Pakistan is very serious we know that the Marriott is a hotel than Americans do stay -- we have not yet heard whether Americans were in the hotel. But is there any reaction either from the White House or Capitol Hill on what happened.
Capitol Hill to Wall Street

Capitol Hill to Wall Street

Will more taxing and spending stop stock market rally?

Video|Fri, 17 Jul 2009|More from News
|wall streetfound at1:55

only engine of economic recovery that things that. Intel and and and Goldman Sachs and those guys are really talking about is that we have small businesses out there hiring people creating new opportunities. That really is how we vote would sit on top of the rest of the world but if this thing does fall apart. How would Wall Street -- I think Wall Street will rejoice I really do it's -- between this health care and -- and this cap and trade. Both the cap and trade is obviously a huge tax on the average person. I don't care who what what what you use what evidence he is you know that your body is startled Charles that it has been rising in the face civil leads initiatives. I'm I'm not startled that it has been you know -- you know you go back to look in 1929 in 1955. We had a bottom in 1932 as far as the stock market is concerned. In an incredible rebound for years over that period this kind of he would get better but the stock market took off sometimes they can be detached from each other. But the big big problem the big big worry is with all of the spending all this deficit spending at some point it will come back on us and will hurt the stock -- but he -- it around we're gonna hear from some supporters -- descended -- the improvement we're seeing in the economy and markets as a direct result of stimulus to buy them. Well you can't say a week ago that -- I'm cinematic sinister listing allowed in a week later say well because it kept. They have a tough time trying to rally around the stock market is and that is an indicator because when the start of fallen apart from forward period they backed away from that. --
Partisan President?

Partisan President?

Former White House press secretary analyzes the Obama administration

Video|Tue, 30 Jun 2009|More from Latest Video
|housing marketfound at13:51

the talk about the energy efficiency of your you -- the housing market looks like right. That's seems like I don't know what -- tax that is definitely -- slap. So it's 300 dollars in