Get Adobe Flash Player to see this content.

About This Video

Under Attack Again

Title:

Under Attack Again

Published: Wed, 26 Aug 2009

Description: CIA has taken fire in Washington before this recent investigation

-

Automatically Generated Transcript (may not be 100% accurate)

" Thank you -- as we told you earlier this week the Justice Department is now pursuing its own inquiry into the interrogations. And it comes at a time when the CIA is taking fire in Washington -- by James Rosen reports this is not the first time the CIA has come under political attack."

" But attorney general Eric -- criminal investigation of CIA officers who interrogated terrorist and recent charges by speaker Nancy Pelosi and other house Democrats -- the CIA misled them. Have led some Republicans to accuse the Democrats of waging war on America's bonds."

" They've kept to say for eight years and now to have. And attorney general the United States opening up a criminal investigation. Against them it's disgraceful and I think -- I have a demoralizing effect in the CIA."

" The Watergate scandals ushered in the first great wave of attacks on the intelligence community Seymour -- is December 1974. New York Times exclusive -- till two decades of CIA abuses. Including domestic break -- wiretaps drug experiments and other violations of the agency's charter. The ensuing -- led to explosive senate hearings led by the late frank church Democrat of Idaho."

" And it is not. That it had a house and senate intern -- permanent oversight panels and further restrictions were placed on CIA assets at home and abroad."

" The charge hearings and the investigations that all of the media attacks in 1970 certainly hurt the CIA. Hurt them I think for two decades."

" But former senator Walter Huddleston a Kentucky Democrat who served on the church committee defends its role in exposing and curbing intelligence abuses."

" I believe in the long run. And we've probably saved intelligence operations because had they continued as they were. Might well of major moves to just eliminate."

" September 11 Attacks produced a new surgeon public backing for more aggressive intelligence tactics. They also produced in late 2005. A new New York Times expose say about the National Security Agency conducting warrantless wiretaps but no real fewer followed."

" Does a very different -- and I think in the church committee after thirty years of revelations people who are little more heartened to this and there are no longer surprise. To find out that the CIA having him say yes."

" but. Americans still embroiled in two foreign wars it remains to be seen whether the current controversies mark another watershed moment. Or simply another skirmish in the eternal tension between spies compelled by training and statute to operate in secrecy. And those charged with their oversight in Washington James Rosen."

More Videos From FOX News

Firing Back

Firing Back

Cheney slams Obama's national security policies in speech at American Enterprise Institute

Video|Thu, 21 May 2009|More from Politics
|United States of Americafound at25:41

motivate the nineteen recruits who boarded those planes on September 11 2001. United States of America was a good country before nine elevenths. Just as we are today. List all the things that make -- a force for
'Best Way to Proceed'

'Best Way to Proceed'

Sen. Cardin stands behind Holder's decision to try 9/11 suspects in U.S.

Video|Wed, 18 Nov 2009|More from Politics
|capitol hillfound at0:01

At a Capitol Hill attorney general Eric Holder testifying before the Senate Judiciary Committee right now others senator Lindsey Graham as you can see in the right hand
Gen. Hayden on 'FNS'

Gen. Hayden on 'FNS'

Former CIA director says release of so-called 'torture memos' makes America 'less safe'

Video|Mon, 20 Apr 2009|More from Politics
|National Security Adviserfound at1:38

President is ultimate -- but it certainly has been quoted articulate the White House I I called the White House council the National Security Adviser the deputy national skewed by the -- in. And you said this would be a grave threat to national security -- probably