Get Adobe Flash Player to see this content.

About This Video

The Verdict: 7/10

Title:

The Verdict: 7/10

Published: Fri, 10 Jul 2009

Description: Why did Justice Ginsburg speak out on Sotomayor?

-

Automatically Generated Transcript (may not be 100% accurate)

" I'm judge ended -- Montana and the verdict is coming. -- statements made by Supreme Court justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg. In this Sunday's New York Times magazine. Here's the question. Justice Ginsburg's well -- full throated soon to be public support. For the nomination of judge Sonia Sotomayor. To join her on the US Supreme Court is unexpected. Astonishing. And unprecedented in modern times so why did she do it. --"

" Acts. There is an unwritten code that about 99%. Of American judges accept. That judges -- not attempt to affect the outcome of public controversies. By expressing thoughts outside of their courtrooms. A judge -- certain rule on motions and applications. From the bench as part of cases that are properly before. Whether publicly controversial or not let judges are expected to exercise restraint. I'm controversies outside the court. -- they actually get into the business of commenting on other cases before other judges. If a -- is perceived as having an opinion on a matter. Because of public positions taken on. The judge will be perceived as less than in March there was a mystique about the Supreme Court justice Ginsburg as time. This mystique keeps judges and justices. Out of -- down and dirty politics. It judges are perceived as just politicians and black robes. Then the influence of their office. And the respect for their decisions. And the moral authority for what they say. We'll be great. Here's what I. Here you have. Through the medium of the New York Times a sitting US Supreme Court justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg. Coming out swinging for a nominee judge Sonia Sotomayor. To the court on which justice Ginsburg sets. This directly violates the unwritten rule among judges that prohibits them. From attempting to influence the outcome -- public controversies. Other than -- what they doing their courtrooms. In other words thou shalt stay out of politics. While wearing a judicial world. Justice Ginsburg has broken that it has no other modern justice -- Wanna hear more my opinions on topics such as these. Check out my latest book Dred -- to revenge a legal history of -- and freedom in America available in bookstores nationwide. You can also tune in to -- nationally syndicated radio show. Brian -- a judge every weekday from 9 AM to noon eastern. And to my online program freedom watch every Wednesday from two to 3 PM eastern on foxnews.com. And don't forget you can always catch me right here throughout the day every day. On the Fox News Channel and on the Fox Business Network I'm judge Andrew Napolitano. And that's -- verdict."

More Videos From FOX News

Long Odds

Long Odds

U.S. Senator Jim Bunning seems to have a few strikes against him in his bid for re-election

Video|Mon, 11 May 2009|More from Latest Video
|Kentucky Statefound at2:28

challenge always Rand Paul son of Republican congressman Ron Paul and possibly Kentucky State senate president David Williams -- you there are -- primary senator Bunning. Would not say but remember he has won close finishes
Supreme Court Pick

Supreme Court Pick

What does Sonia Sotomayor's nomination tell us about Obama's plans to govern?

Video|Tue, 26 May 2009|More from Politics
|White Housefound at2:25

liberal justices. And sell the most liberal senators on the Judiciary Committee Chuck Schumer has set. They still have to apply the constitution. They can't say I'm my feelings are with you and therefore you're gonna win and if that's what she's saying. I don't think should be concerned how to help us understand what this whole and goofy comment is all about him. Well. We do have. What seems to be an ivory tower for Supreme Court justices. Harry Blackmun told me he wrote Roe vs . Wade most of us live in the ivory tower some of us grew up there. But you live in a very insulated world and you lose the common touch and it's good to have the common touch. But federal judges more than anybody in public life sometimes have to hold their nose when they do their job because the law is unfair because it's unwise. That's not grounds for throwing it out only one -- violates our fundamental principles as laid out in our bill of rights and our constitution. Can a judge throw out or court throw out a federal law . Frequently go -- the Supreme Court saying. It's not our job to judge the wisdom of a law that's one way of saying we're holding our nose because we don't like the law. Judges have to do that and judge total might or on the Supreme Court will have to do that and she says she will not do that. I think she's got some very serious -- that's interesting what are we 120 days in this new White House . That he is that your sense will be a lot of talk about this to us whether or not this was a rush -- whether or not the White House had enough time. To do the background work and your experience of nominees is -- enough time. Well it is enough time
High Court Opening

High Court Opening

Supreme Court Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg says there will 'soon' be an opening on the high court

Video|Sun, 15 Mar 2009|More from Law Center
|breast cancerfound at2:23

court. And some with. Various -- practical advice justice O'Connor. She had breast cancer and she was on the bench knowing me and surgery. So she told me first don't try to answer all of America