Get Adobe Flash Player to see this content.

About This Video

Middle East Panel

Title:

Middle East Panel

Published: Thu, 9 Jul 2009

Description: Mike Tobin and guests discuss Israeli settlements

-

Automatically Generated Transcript (may not be 100% accurate)

" is outside and everything that hasn't misguided that's the point is you don't unanswered question is this I have to question the problem in the Palestinian people have a right to controller sovereign territory in Gaza entirely with no questions -- international affairs I want wrapped up in Gaza debate and -- and the reality is it Israel's not gonna open up is not and naval blockade of Gaza. It because the Palestinians will immediately arm themselves. Of course it brings -- the counterargument what's the problem with that too strong army sitting on each other's borders music they're negotiating business. The territorial waters -- these the United States. The US. The -- so that you could argue that didn't we are engaging on Cuba's Socrates because it is okay because America. It'll deter -- is they've argument. You've got guys gone to the strategy yeah this is this. It didn't happen the entire region is burning up because you -- it destabilizing every single country including the West Bank including that we're talking up -- we're talking about little we're talking about -- so. It was -- Yeah that's one issue what is your little hole -- you know the other issue is that the state is president episode is that yes they got. That's always a video other and you prove -- million -- my friend I'm an -- and end -- text as the drag from within. -- my friend al-Qaeda cells. Listen I don't want to -- this. Israel and the Palestinian Authority have -- legitimate. Dispute. About the future is fusion I'll. What is known outside of the last night was known -- that -- well okay that's okay. Is considered the Weber well on channel one that I'll tell. Gjelten intelligent than college days of married okay so it's basically in the parlance of mainstream Israel outside the window -- yeah. It's very -- of watermelon yeah well I'll tell you something like me Israelis are today. More uniting around an -- how concept then they have been since 1983 the -- Acknowledged all of bipartisan study also says. -- Or did you know I didn't have the user out there on the screen yeah they do not include defensible borders and I'm gonna reveal his secret -- strategy room. Okay that I will I will bet you don't decency. Aren't you rock you know who defensible borders means look Israel has there's basically and nine mile. There's nine miles or wins between Arnold and Paris point between the state Jordan has making Jordan ministry NC. So this -- stock and -- 1940 arms weapons that grapevine. Right that it'll be in indefensible borders. Now there is there are very you can count the number of people sensible -- country that has peace agreements with such as Jordan Egypt. And it's working that it is working on -- its own borders means can you can you tell me with confidence. The future of the Hashemite kingdom can you tell me confidence when can you tell let confidence win win Mubarak leaves -- in Egypt. What is gonna happen with a Muslim brother will take over you know."

" It's. -- that getting what kind of reporting yeah well. Which is -- that's -- never -- but does that mean by your definition then peace treaties agreements are no longer binding peace treaties are there isn't one of these -- department and in the one we're introducing that it could if he -- suddenly they -- Egypt collapses at a Muslim -- takes over that he's -- could be null and -- definition cannot quite Israel that it had peace treaty with Egypt but it can also at any point have a right wing government that decides to attack Egypt and making the move toward. Let me just like yeah. Yeah. Yeah get into is a settlement issue and really the tension between the US and Israel because again as we we took this -- Hulu to get around this -- group called girls go back to the -- anybody at this point is this. If Netanyahu. Is talking about a two state solution. Am going to president and making -- speech and when President Obama saying I am in favor of a two state solution he's not sincere disagreement."

" He's completely sincere he's completely sincere I mean. And attacked the outlook and tell you I was the one that pulled out in terms of in terms of press prime minister -- any concessions. And now. Fulfilled. Is that word you want to -- pulled out of him wrong I knew it wasn't done what he's brought in labor party people is editor in terms of sincerity to insert -- what it does here's the strategic point. The strategic insight gets on international television or national television he says look. Israel has right is that Israel Israel Israel. Israel looks that the West Bank Judas and as being in its -- didn't care for an."

" And it has and Google yeah yeah. Four all right it's okay and why -- Obama and Clinton would not could argue that -- two state solution. If you -- is opposed to this idea that Israel claims Judea Samaria -- the visual sense that you get the Palestinians for state. -- you keep building."

" state solution. Is that it will become the solemn. The summary discussion. On both sides bring bring it right and planes and now there -- here you have as you get a federal -- you federal system the United States using the doesn't. But two state solution is a Palestinian state. And tips in the West Bank okay and Judaism are also it to anyone -- Some are okay good okay."

" So what so what let me ask your question why why what was wrong with -- discussion. Before 1967 is okay and analysts think there's no problem now now you've pulled back and how what would be the what was BD. Strategic. Advantage it has been if at some point after. The after the proclamation let's say -- intra Palestinian -- courtroom in undefined borders. That he -- making Jordan which has a 70% Palestinian majority and as well as our partners such as the south in -- a you know we're gonna jump in so."

" It's just saying so of them yeah. Remember. -- looked so it becomes a security problem. We're -- another security mission hearted blue -- have you creating. A situation where it is -- those two states. But he does not threatened by the Protestants and -- So that's a different discussion and different discussions are very good. And ideological discussion with the security discussions that is but -- a professional discussion is that America can --"

" So also community does so well. It's. Assessment that the territory belongs to Israel and in fact UN Security Council resolutions which are binding on member states considers. Clinching at least with who has -- as we've heard several UN resolutions passed resolutions but the point is they consider."

" Only one right -- in Arizona I mean that obviously we're getting we're getting way off the factor people. Only let me just correct your mistake here the only UN Security Council resolution that has any. And it's not finding the closest thing it's not a chapter seven resolution chapter six resolution. That is this is the backbone of Arab Israeli negotiations today UN Security Council resolution to 42 of November 22 1967. We had to govern every single. Arab Israeli peace initiative since then and it basically calls for Israel to withdraw from territory not the territory as we speak. Security Council purposely set so -- could have secure and recognized boundaries that's what was the language of the resolution every single US administration. And the UN Security Council itself on the record in the protocols has said Israel did not at the time that he was attacked by. Four Arab armies and 67 have defensible borders would have to depends."

" Borders settlements and defensible borders are part of the discussion. On Tuesday solution. Now defensible borders means in the in the language of the labor party and you go along who developed the concept that Israel will have to happen. Control. Perhaps annexed in Jordan is the only way it's gonna be different gonna be able to protect its western shoreline we've got senate is it really is on the Charlotte."

" It's fair enough because India and Israelis to consider that this settlement to be the front -- and advanced. And it may be Arnold and don't let them know that -- the settlement no business over that night you know I don't. So then and then yeah. Yeah -- yeah Gaza Strip party reintroducing the guy's argument that rockets would -- it withdrew from the guys though and that's."

" that the only food that prevented them rockets from hitting us too long before that this engagement was the presence. All of these rituals in -- okay and there there's. The of the Israeli troops and there's no work put that due -- settlements right -- and -- plus and data for the let's settlers and there's a lot of this -- themselves. Are not military bases. Where those civilians but yeah. Military bases because it takes more soldiers to protect -- he had settled but but when you when you. Particularly. The wish of a -- for -- states. You create. The need for those folks all these people. Cool. Okay are subject to -- as -- awards or whatever okay if you. Making peace with them. And only bring you -- borders -- another factor. We have an American administration that we really I think that Israel's relation with the with the United States. Is okay faster. And Israel's security. Israel's existence. Right. There's an administration. The demands. -- more settlements constructions confession you know also removed. Dismantling and probably ends at this and they don't yet not yet none of the American administrations. Ever support of the settlement. And -- do much about it if you -- a new administration who's gonna keep."

More Videos From FOX News

Dick Cheney on 'FNS'

Dick Cheney on 'FNS'

Former vice president on CIA investigation, Obama administration's first seven months, relationship with former President Bush

Video|Sun, 30 Aug 2009|More from Politics
|vice president dick cheneyfound at0:14

And hello again from Fox News in Washington. The Obama Justice Department made big news this -- launching a review that could lead to prosecution of CIA officers. Now you'll hear from former Vice President Dick Cheney Barack Obama is leading credit when it comes to the war on terror. On Friday we traveled -- vacation home just outside
After the Show Show: 5/27

After the Show Show: 5/27

'Special Report' panel on GM's future, North Korea

Video|Wed, 27 May 2009|More from Latest Video
|North Koreafound at0:24, 2:37, 4:01, 5:55, 7:05

General Motors. Bankruptcy is currently winning. What should the US do about North Korea is one that just popped up. Isolation 88%. And also we have the issue of -- or will she win confirmation easily be tough. All -- votes that you can weigh in on. And we have comments. I will not buy a new car from any government says bill in Connecticut thanks bill. We start though with North Korea and let's bring in our panel gives them Steve Hayes senior writer for the weekly standard AB Stoddard associate editor of the hill and syndicated columnist Charles Krauthammer. North Korea . Obviously has launched a series of missiles at least five that we know over the past few days at an underground nuclear test. And now we are waiting to see what comes out of the UN Security Council if anything. First let's check in with the Pentagon national security correspondent Jennifer Griffin. Jennifer what do they sent over there at the Pentagon this whole North Korea situation.
have contingency plans for everything. And they obviously have a plan for North Korea but even behind the scenes when you walk through that nineteen and a half miles a quarter were there. Well -- they're
posture or offensive -- those ships have been launched by the navy's South Korea's that move is not moving troops around. So you you're hearing a lot of hot rhetoric but. I would say in the hallways here that they are down -- that being said I did get one piece of information at the end of the day. Would suggesting that the latest Intel is seeing some steam rising from the young beyond nuclear plant it's not clear what that -- is they're analyzing it. But it could suggest you know activities starting and potential re processing starting. At that young dot -- in North Korea .
several days of sort of laughed saying a little bits and treating North Korea like a grumpy child is is while we know they are working. Feverishly behind the scenes to extract more pressure from particularly
Scott says why is the UN doing nothing about North Korea it you know Steve we've seen this this packed full. Many times we've we spend this -- before I mean un the
that -- while. I think you know in some ways hurting North Korea's economic. Standing you haven't strangled. The regime there. And I and I and I agree with -- and that I -- Troubled by the administration's response to this both -- for school respected to Jennifer important what people are -- inside the Pentagon. In -- that the administration was looking at North Korea before this you were call it Stephen Bosworth who was the special envoy. In it to North Korean matters the world to the six party talks. Said that he was relatively relaxed. About this he said that just that with in the past couple of weeks. I'm not relaxed just because North Korea has a crazy man running the country. Doesn't mean that we can afford to treated as a second or third order threat I mean this testing is ongoing but all. Signs are pointing that this was actually nuclear bomb that detonated under the ground here in North Korea and -- it now it's it's a third the size of Hiroshima. That's a serious nuclear explosion yeah it was I'm not last one some people said well -- in October of 2006 and some people said. Well wasn't -- real -- and it wasn't really successful we don't need to be alarmed about it this one I think we do need to be alarmed about it. And you also have if that case since the market -- much the other media coverage this. You -- is a fact. That North Korea is a serial proliferate here and they're not proliferating too in Britain or they're not -- proliferating countries that are friendly -- the United States. Is that north -- was caught red handed sending at least nuclear technology. The know how perhaps the personnel to Syria. A state sponsor of terror I mean this is -- big deal. And you even had -- secretary of state Hillary Clinton raising and hearing that it wasn't confirmed that North Korea was in fact a nuclear power. It's just an interesting dynamic here I have a question for you Charles in Ohio --
in our senior White House correspondent Major Garrett -- we're talking about North Korea and the -- administration's response. What's your sense behind the scenes there of how things are are going with us.
tantrum it's a way to get attention. That's not going to advance North Korea's interest as if the north Koreans have broad interest that it's seeking to achieve with the international community there's no evidence of that hasn't been for more than a decade. North Korea is isolated there's almost no level of economic sanctions that haven't been applied and there's no record or evidence to believe that
on the online show thanks everybody for the comments we finished up North Korea isolation is the best policy 89%. GM bankruptcy and then fell 67%. So my -- winds easily. Don't forget visit our home
'Not Practical'

'Not Practical'

Israel responds to U.N. resolution calling for immediate cease-fire

Video|Fri, 9 Jan 2009|More from World
|Security Councilfound at0:09, 1:04

from overseas now in the Middle East and Israel's vow to press ahead with its military assault on Gaza. The Israeli prime minister's office responding to a UN Security Council resolution. Passed last night calling for an immediate cease fire. Israel says more rocket attacks today from Hamas in the Israel's shows
bottle bottom line we're acting to protect people. How does that UN Security Council holds sway in Jerusalem. Does that have any impact on your decision making. Obviously we've we've been studying it today the cabinet