The Supreme Court has agreed to review President Barack Obama’s executive actions that could allow up to 5 million immigrants to “come out of the shadows,” in his words, and work legally in the United States.
The justices, who have twice rejected challenges to Obama’s health care law, said Tuesday that they will consider undoing lower court rulings that have blocked the plan from taking effect. Whatever their decision, it is likely to dominate a presidential campaign already roiled by immigration issue.
The case probably will be argued in April and decided by late June, about a month before both parties' presidential nominating conventions.
Fourteen months ago, Obama ordered the creation of a program – called Deferred Action for Parents of Americans and Lawful Permanent Residents, or DAPA – intended to allow undocumented immigrants who are the parents of U.S. citizens or lawful permanent residents to be shielded from deportation and providing them with work permits.
Texas is leading 26 states in challenging the immigration executive actions.
Best pix of the week
Best pix of 2015
Latino activists in Chicago will join 'Black Christmas' protest; call for mayor to resign
Divided families the legacy of surge in Cuban immigration to U.S.
GOP candidates got into a heated immigration discussion
Ellis Island Museum to update story of immigration
2015: The year in news for Latinos
So far, the federal courts have sided with the states to keep the administration from issuing work permits and allowing the immigrants to begin receiving some federal benefits.
If the justices eventually side with the administration, that would leave roughly seven months in Obama's presidency to implement his plans.
At issue is DAPA, which Obama said in late 2014 would allow people who have been in the United States more than five years and who have children who are in the country legally to "come out of the shadows and get right with the law."
Texas quickly led a legal challenge to the program and has won every round in court so far. Most recently, in November, the 5th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals ruled in favor of the states, prompting the appeal to the Supreme Court.
Solicitor General Donald Verrilli Jr. said in his court filing that allowing those rulings to stand would force millions of people "to continue to work off the books, without the option of lawful employment to provide for their families."
The administration said Texas and the other states don't even have the right to challenge the plan in federal court. The lower courts decided that Texas does have the right, or standing, to sue because at least 500,000 people living in Texas would qualify for work permits and thus become eligible for driver licenses, the cost of which are subsidized by the state. "Texas would incur millions of dollars in costs," the state said in its brief to the Supreme Court.
The future of the estimated 11 million immigrants living in the country illegally has been much discussed by Republican and Democratic presidential candidates. Democratic front-runner Hillary Rodham Clinton has pledged to go further than Obama to protect large groups of immigrants from deportation.
Republican candidate Donald Trump has proposed deporting all people who are living in the U.S. illegally, an idea embraced by some GOP candidates and dismissed by others.
Obama said he was spurred to act on his own by Congress' failure to pass comprehensive immigration legislation. An earlier program that is not being challenged, Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals, shields immigrants brought to the country illegally as children. More than 720,000 young immigrants have been granted permission under that program to live and work legally in the United States.
The White House also has shifted its enforcement actions to focus on criminals, those who pose a threat to national security or public safety, and recent border-crossers.
The change means that people who are here illegally but who are not otherwise violating the law are less likely to face deportation.
About 235,000 people were deported in the federal fiscal year that ended Sept. 30, according to the Department of Homeland Security.
That was the smallest number since 2006 and a 42 percent drop since a record high of more than 409,000 in 2012.
Still, the administration drew criticism from Democrats and immigration advocates for raids this month that resulted in the arrest of more than 120 immigrants from Central America who came to the country illegally since 2014. Those recent arrivals are not among immigrants who would benefit from Obama's plan.
The Associated Press contributed to this report.