POLITICS

Supreme Court denies Arizona's bid to deny bail to undocumented immigrants

FILE - This Nov. 18, 2014, file photo shows the U.S. Supreme Court in Washington, as seen from the roof of the U.S. Capitol. Anthony Elonis claimed he was just kidding when he posted a series of graphically violent rap lyrics on Facebook about killing his estranged wife, shooting up a kindergarten class and attacking an FBI agent. But his wife didn't see it that way. Neither did a federal jury. In a far-reaching case that probes the limits of free speech over the Internet, the Supreme Court on Monday is considering whether Elonis' Facebook posts, and others like it, deserve protection under the First Amendment. (AP Photo/Carolyn Kaster, File)

FILE - This Nov. 18, 2014, file photo shows the U.S. Supreme Court in Washington, as seen from the roof of the U.S. Capitol. Anthony Elonis claimed he was just kidding when he posted a series of graphically violent rap lyrics on Facebook about killing his estranged wife, shooting up a kindergarten class and attacking an FBI agent. But his wife didn't see it that way. Neither did a federal jury. In a far-reaching case that probes the limits of free speech over the Internet, the Supreme Court on Monday is considering whether Elonis' Facebook posts, and others like it, deserve protection under the First Amendment. (AP Photo/Carolyn Kaster, File)  (The Associated Press)

The Supreme Court on Monday rejected an Arizona county's attempt to reinstate a state law that denies bail to people in the country illegally who are charged with certain crimes.

The justices left in place a lower-court ruling that struck down the law that Arizona voters approved in 2006.

The law denied bail to immigrants who are in the country illegally and have been charged with a range of felonies that include shoplifting, aggravated identity theft, sexual assault and murder.

As a result, immigrants spent months in jail and often simply pleaded guilty and were turned over to federal immigration authorities for deportation.

Justices Samuel Alito, Antonin Scalia and Clarence Thomas said they would have heard the case. It takes the votes of four justices to hear an appeal.

More On This...

Thomas, in an opinion for himself and Scalia, said the court's action could give lower courts "free rein to strike down state laws on the basis of dubious constitutional analysis."

He said it is "disheartening" that another justice wouldn't also want to review the lower court ruling.

In November, the justices refused a request from Maricopa county to keep the law in place while the appeal played out at the Supreme Court. Thomas dissented from that vote, too.

The case is County of Maricopa v. Lopez-Valenzuela, 14-825.

Like us on Facebook
Follow us on Twitter & Instagram