Virtually every poll in the last two weeks — Gallup, Democracy Corps, USA Today, Rasmussen, New York Times/CBS — shows that Barack Obama and Mitt Romney are in a dead heat nationally as well as in the nine battleground states.
For Obama, is this glass half-full or half-empty?
Certainly the economic news and poll ratings related to Obama’s handling of the economy suggest that he is holding his own versus Romney right now. And that's pretty good. After all, unemployment is still over 8 percent and voters rating the economy negatively exceed those who rate it positively by a whopping 35 percent margin, according to the recent Democracy Corps poll.
The key wrong-track-right-track question is now 59 percent to 33 wrong track. I'd like to ask Romney the question: If you are not ahead of Obama given these numbers, how can you expect to defeat him in November?
But there is also a lot of bad news in these polls about Mitt Romney, which paradoxically could mean even worse news for Obama.
For example, on the key issue of likability — which I believe in most elections is more important than all others — Tuesday’s Gallup Poll reported that Obama is more likable than Romney by a 2-to-1 margin, 60 percent to 31. On a “feel warm”/“feel cold” scale in the American Corps poll, Obama was plus-18 percent on Romney.
Romney has shown the ability to fix his problems on issues — he simply changes his positions. But can he change his poor likability numbers?
We have seen months and months of politically tone-deaf gaffes (“I’ll bet you $10,000,” “I like firing people” or — sorry, can’t resist — “Seamus liked it up there on the car roof” — even though the dog’s bowels had turned to water, leading Romney to hose down the car and Seamus and put him back on top for the rest of the 12-hour trip).
Romney's basic personality — he is perceived as being cold and lacking authenticity — might not be fixable.
Moreover, Romney also consistently shows a significant deficit against Obama among women (especially working women) and Hispanic voters (he is running behind Obama in most polls by 2-to-1).
But to state the paradox again: Bad news for Romney can be interpreted as worse news for Obama — if he is not running well ahead of Romney, given all the former Massachusetts governor's personality and perception weaknesses as a presidential candidate, that shows a fundamental problem that seriously threatens Obama’s success in November.
And what is it?
I think it comes down to the core message of Obama's campaign thus far — his liberal populist message appeals to the liberal base (including me) but it doesn’t seem to please the crucial centrist independent bloc, the classic “swing” voters who will ultimately determine the outcome of the presidential election.
This week’s Politico/George Washington University poll shows Romney with a 10 percent lead among independents. According to the Democracy Corps, those voters who define themselves as independents — including independents who say they lean Democratic or lean Republican, is as much as 30 percent of the electorate.
And what will move these voters? According to the Democracy Corps poll, voters favor “a plan to dramatically reduce the deficit over the next five years” by a margin of more than 3 to 1 — 59 percent to 19. We know from past history that these are the Ross Perot/Bill Clinton swing voters who are fiscally conservative and socially moderate. They are up for grabs in 2012.
A midcourse correction in message strategy appears to be in order for Obama and his campaign to consider. The president can pre-empt the center and turn these independent voters in his direction by endorsing the across-the-board approach of the Simpson-Bowles deficit reduction plan. He can do this dramatically in his acceptance speech at the Democratic National Convention, if not before. And he can challenge Romney to do the same.
This is a strategy aimed at persuading the persuadables — and, if the economic news remains as mediocre on Nov. 6 as it is today, it could be Obama’s best and perhaps only chance of pushing that glass above half-full and winning in November.
Lann Davis is a Fox News contributor. He is a Washington D.C. attorney specializing in legal crisis management, served as Special Counsel to President Bill Clinton in 1996-98 and served as a member of President Bush’s Privacy and Civil Liberties Board in 2006-07. He currently serves as Special Counsel to Dilworth Paxson. He is the author of the forthcoming book, “Crisis Tales – Five Rules for Handling Scandal in Business, Politics and Life,” to be published by Simon & Schuster.
Lanny Davis, a Washington attorney and principal in the firm of Lanny J. Davis & Associates, specializing in legal crisis management and dispute resolution, served as President Clinton’s special counsel from 1996-98 and as a member of President Bush’s Privacy and Civil Liberties Oversight Board from 2006-07. He currently serves as special counsel to Dilworth Paxson and is the author of the new book, "Crisis Tales: Five Rules for Coping With Crises in Business, Politics, and Life," (Simon & Schuster March 2013). Follow him on Twitter at @LannyDavis.