Updated September 15, 2009
Will Obama Take 'Responsibility' For the Baucus Bill?
, FOXNews.com
Even without a public option, the Baucus bill will create massive problems for private health insurance.
Senator Max Baucus (D-Mont.) will make one more attempt this week to get Republicans to join the Democrats health care reform plans. Some breathed a sigh of relief that his health care bill does not include a government-run insurance program. Those who listened to President Obama's health care address to Congress last week noted that much. But the proposed regulations will destroy private insurance, guaranteeing another debate in a couple of years to fix the disastrous shape that these regulations will leave health care in.
The most striking part of the plan is that it is partially paid for it with taxes on different health care companies. Health insurance is thus taxed at the same time Democrats are claiming they want to encourage more people getting private insurance. Democrats seem to think that taxes (or "fees" as the bill calls them) won't raise costs and thus prices for insurance. But of course it does. Yet, an anonymous source in the Senate told Politico: "If insurance companies pass this fee along to customers, they run the risk of losing out in a newly competitive environment." Unfortunately, taxes would raise prices no matter how competitive insurance markets are. Furthermore, the proposed regulations will reduce competition by driving insurance companies out of business.
Regulations would eliminate any caps on the benefits insurance companies provide. It sounds wonderful, whether your health care costs total a million or ten million dollars, insurance companies will be required to cover it. Right now people have a choice over how much coverage they want. The more they pay in premiums, the more coverage they receive. But Democrats are promising that we can get these unlimited benefits as well as tax the insurance companies and enjoy lower insurance premiums at the same time.
On CBS's "60 Minutes" this past Sunday, President Obama promised that these reforms will stop insurance premiums from going up. "And if people look and say, 'you know what? This hasn't reduced my costs. My premiums are still going up 25%, insurance companies are still jerkin' me around,' I'm the one who's going to be held responsible," Obama said. His claim that he is going to be "held responsible" seems debatable because the safe guess is that he will continue to blame the insurance companies for any future problems.
There are even worse provisions in the Obama/Baucus plan. One of them prevents insurance companies from charging more to those with pre-existing conditions before they bought insurance. If people are not required to have insurance, this rule would encourage people to wait until they were sick enough to get insurance. Since it would primarily be those who were already sick who would chose to get insurance, premiums would soar. And even if people are required to have insurance, people would initially get the lowest benefit plan. Once they are sick, they would then switch to the best insurance plan available. Pretty soon only the lowest benefit plans would be left.
The Obama/Baucus plan doesn't force people to buy insurance; it requires them to pay a tax if they don't. But the tax is so low that the end result will be the same as not requiring people to buy insurance. The tax for those who don't buy insurance ranges from $750 for the poorest single people to as high as $3,800 a year for families. Even without unlimited insurance benefits, the average insurance cost today is much higher: in 2008, it was on average $4,704 for individuals and $12,682 for families. But with no penalty for having a pre-existing condition, people will pay the tax and wait to buy insurance once they get sick. If people only buy insurance once they are already sick, insurance premiums will soar dramatically. In short order there will be much higher insurance premiums.
Of course, the bill also imposes taxes on pharmaceutical manufacturers, medical device makers and clinical laboratories. Obviously that would simultaneously raise health care costs and lower the return to developing new drugs and medical devices. Yet, we keep on hearing that Democrats want to lower health care costs, not raise them. If Democrats really think that all these other taxes also won't raise prices, we suggest that they try consulting with an economist or two.
Even without a public option, this bill will create massive problems for private health insurance. The regulations will decimate private insurance and make it easier for Democrats to then pass their government-run insurance bill.
John Lott is a FOXNews.com contributor, economist and the author of Freedomnomics. John Lott's past pieces for FOX News can be found here and here.
Fox Nation
-
"SNL" Destroy Obama Over Spending
November 22, 2009 1 comments
-
NYT Op-ed: Conservatives Cause Ft. Hood
November 22, 2009 2 comments
-
Dowd Rips Obama, Says He Could Learn From Palin
November 22, 2009 7 comments
-
Is Obamacare A Ponzi Scheme?
November 22, 2009 7 comments
-
Bishop Bans Rep. Kennedy From Communion
November 22, 2009 64 comments
-
Glenn Beck Reveals "The Plan"
November 22, 2009 119 comments
-
9/11 Suspects Seek Show Trial
November 22, 2009 84 comments
-
Rev. Wright Re-emerges: 'Don't Call Me the Controversial Rev. Wright ...'
November 21, 2009 56 comments
-
McCain Risks Losing Senate Seat
November 20, 2009 364 comments
-
Candidate Enters Race for Fake NH-00 Congressional District
November 20, 2009 35 comments
Most Commented
-
Why is the White House Still Attacking Fox News?
October 19, 2009 2,226 comments
-
Did 'Curb' and HBO Cross the Line?
October 28, 2009 1,430 comments
-
Should Justice Investigate ACORN?
September 10, 2009 1,397 comments
-
Do You Agree With Decision to Release Lockerbie Bomber?
August 20, 2009 1,275 comments
-
Did Carter Cross the Line?
September 16, 2009 1,208 comments
-
Reuel Marc Gerecht: Major Hasan and Holy War
November 22, 2009
-
No Bondholder Left Behind
November 22, 2009
-
O'Grady: The End of Bolivian Democracy
November 22, 2009
-
The Senate's Health-Care Act
November 22, 2009
-
Cyclones and Global Warming
November 22, 2009
-
Alas, it’s the end of the road for petrolheads
November 22, 2009
-
A gross insult to the people of Europe
November 22, 2009
-
Rule the waves? Not any more we don’t
November 22, 2009
-
They’re still wriggling to avoid the flak on Iraq
November 22, 2009
-
Copenhagen will fail – and quite right too
November 22, 2009
-
Religion and Capitalism
November 21, 2009 10 comments
-
New York Times Gets One Right
November 20, 2009 7 comments
-
The True Cost of the Health Care Bills
November 20, 2009 6 comments
-
Legal Theft
November 20, 2009 6 comments
-
Rewarding Incompetence
November 19, 2009 25 comments



recommend

Subscribe to Comments
