Updated March 19, 2009
Better Green Jobs: The One-Word Solution
, FOXNews.com
Thu, 19 Mar 2009 15:16:21 +0000
"Green jobs" are all the rage. Supposedly, we can strengthen the economy by government spending and regulating to advance the development of environmentally friendly, "green" technologies. Green jobs, President Obama and others would have us believe, are the elixir for both our environmental and economic problems.
By J.D. Foster
"Green jobs" are all the rage. Supposedly, we can strengthen the economy by government spending and regulating to advance the development of environmentally friendly, "green" technologies. Green jobs, President Obama and others would have us believe, are the elixir for both our environmental and economic problems.
If they're serious, I have just one word of advice: rickshaws.
Rickshaws are small, lightweight, two-wheeled taxis motored by an enterprising entrepreneur either as a runner or in the more modern version, pulled by a bicyclist. They are popular in many countries around the world, but especially in Asia.
Rickshaws are the way to go for green jobs. There are no rickshaw drivers in the United States today, so every rickshaw job is a new job. Even more new jobs would be created as the auto companies shift, with a little urging from Uncle Sam, to rickshaw production in the United States -- no point importing them from abroad, obviously, if job production is the point.
And what could be greener than a rickshaw? It produces no pollution whatsoever. And the materials it is made from are typically all very natural and simple -- wood, cloth, a few basic metals, nothing fancy. Until, of course, Washington decides to worry about safety and demands that every new rickshaw come with airbags for runner and passenger alike.
The way to start would be to begin forcing taxi drivers in America to drive rickshaws. Perhaps start out with a 1 percent mandate, go to 10 percent after a few years, and then eventually to 50 percent. At the same time, the government could require that every individual and family with more than one car or truck have at least one rickshaw.
Good policy often has beneficial side effects, and widespread rickshaw use certainly qualifies. For example, imagine how much healthier America's taxi drivers would be if they had to drive a rickshaw at least two days out of five. Obesity would drop and cardiovascular health would soar. These and similar health benefits would go a long ways toward bringing down the increase in health care costs, though there may be a slight increase in demand for podiatrists.
Before long, rickshaws would be so popular that companies would be exploring ways to move heavier objects using two, four, or even eight-man rickshaw teams. Unkind observers might note that these new contraptions look a lot like the machines in use before humans learned to domesticate beasts of burden, but the media have a long history of ignoring naysayers.
Sometimes the right solution is the simple solution overlooked. Rather than fabricate science to support renewable energy, rather than pretend that we gain jobs when we destroy two jobs in the economy for every one green job created, we should focus on simple, proven solutions. Mr. President, give rickshaws a chance.
###
J.D. Foster, Ph.D., is the Norman B. Ture Senior Fellow in the Economics of Fiscal Policy at The Heritage Foundation (heritage.org).
Fox Nation
-
Couric Recites Health Care Poem on 'Evening News'
November 24, 2009 81 comments
-
Seinfeld in the Year 2009
November 24, 2009 6 comments
-
JLo Falls During Live Performance
November 24, 2009 21 comments
-
Amateur Hour
November 24, 2009 20 comments
-
Dobbs Mulls Running for President
November 24, 2009 30 comments
-
ACORN Caught Dumping Documents in Dumpster
November 24, 2009 50 comments
-
Woman Loses Health Insurance Over Facebook Photo
November 23, 2009 16 comments
-
Union Leader Quits After Scout Backlash
November 23, 2009 3 comments
-
Man Happy With Simple Life in Utah Cave
November 23, 2009 2 comments
-
U.S. Stalin Memorial Plan Under Fire
November 23, 2009 76 comments
Most Commented
-
Why is the White House Still Attacking Fox News?
October 19, 2009 2,226 comments
-
Did 'Curb' and HBO Cross the Line?
October 28, 2009 1,431 comments
-
Should Justice Investigate ACORN?
September 10, 2009 1,398 comments
-
Do You Agree With Decision to Release Lockerbie Bomber?
August 20, 2009 1,275 comments
-
Did Carter Cross the Line?
September 16, 2009 1,210 comments
-
McGurn: The Other Senate Maverick
November 23, 2009
-
George Melloan: Government Deficits and Private Growth
November 23, 2009
-
Global Warming With the Lid Off
November 24, 2009
-
Obey's Afghan War Surtax
November 24, 2009
-
Liberals and Mammography
November 24, 2009
-
Would a soldier serving on the Chilcot committee be ruthless enough?
November 23, 2009
-
I do not accept that £64,000 a year for politicians is peanuts
November 23, 2009
-
It’s OK, you’re allowed to laugh at Cast Offs
November 23, 2009
-
Dave’n’George: there may be trouble ahead
November 23, 2009
-
Strip away the figleaf and reveal naysayers
November 23, 2009
-
Movement on Prohibition
November 24, 2009
-
Latest Excuse Not to Work
November 24, 2009
-
Then They Came for Our Flat-Screen TVs. And We Were Silent.
November 24, 2009
-
Irresponsible Krugman, Again
November 23, 2009 5 comments
-
Our Entertainer-Monarchs
November 23, 2009 7 comments



recommend

Subscribe to Comments
